From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-09-29 11:29:31
|
On Sunday 29 September 2002 13:14, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Does that mean we'd have yet another dependency ? > > Probably not. IIRC these sorts of things are ideally supposed > to go in-process with the JACK server, not in with our application. Oh, ok then. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |