From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2002-08-12 14:20:16
|
On Monday 12 August 2002 13:30, Richard Bown wrote: > Actually the existing matrix mechanism is pretty half cocked but > I was going to just push off the old matrix elements pointers and > a copy off their Events so we can rematch and reconnect after the > command has been executed. I think that what you and Chris did on the matrix and notation selectors=20 feedback proves that computing a selection is quite fast, at least fast=20 enough to keep up with basic user interaction. So don't you think that=20 keeping the selection rectangle around and recomputing the whole selectio= n=20 after each input would work ? And while we're at it, we could make the selection rectangle resizable (e= =2Eg.=20 click, drag, release, click on edge, drag edge to adjust selection). --=20 =09=09=09=09Guillaume =09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org |