Re: [Rosegarden-devel] progress dialog troubles

[Guillaume L. <gla...@te...>]

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 10:18, Chris Cannam wrote:

> Qt's method sounds better for cases where we're carrying out a
> very regular series of steps.  But I think it could be hard to
> get it to work right in this particular case.

Then perhaps the idea of a progress dialog in those cases is simply not w=
orth=20
it, and we should just have a "busy" cursor (possibly something with a ni=
ce=20
anim) instead... Or, it also doesn't really matter if the dialog's bar=20
"jumps" rather than growing at a steady pace.

--=20
=09=09=09=09Guillaume
=09=09=09=09http://www.telegraph-road.org