Re: [Rosegarden-user] Performance concern....

[Chris C. <ca...@al...>]

On Thursday 26 Aug 2004 13:39, Wayne Veilleux wrote:
> I will try to
> look deeper about the realtime-lsm module in 2.6 kernel that is suppose
> to offert the same level of latency as 2.4

All the realtime-lsm module does is provide a way for processes to run with 
particular scheduling priorities without having to run as root.  It doesn't 
make the kernel any better at meeting low-latency scheduling requirements.

I'm not sure exactly which setup is considered best for 2.6 these days.  
Probably the thing you want is Ingo Molnar's voluntary preemption patch:

   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/voluntary-preempt/

but I've never tried it (or 2.6 at all).


Chris