Re: [RomaFramework-dev] Proposal to separate the distribution in ZIP modules

[Valerio S. <val...@gm...>]

Me and Alessio we'll branch it in our spare-time.

anyone else?

On 7/4/06, Luca Garulli <l.g...@pr...> wrote:
>
> Yes, it could be the best approach to follow in. But now I'm very busy for
> the release of 1.0 alpha. Who want to create the branch and follow
> evolution/build/etc?
>
> If we reach a stable-full-working maven2 version of the build system we
> can release it in place of current ANT version for the 1.0.
>
> How many volounteers? Not more than 10 please... :-D
>
> On Tue, July 4, 2006 17:34, Valerio Schiavoni said:
> > a possible 'parallel' development of the maven2ization could be carried
> on
> > branching for a while the main romaframework svn trunk repository. so
> that
> > we can discuss about possible modularizaton, and related stuff.
> >
> > a possible approach could be 'ala cocoon-2.2' : it was recently ported
> to
> > maven2, and the same code organization  can be  used as possible
> > guideline.
> >
> > what do you think?
> >
> > cheers,
> > valerio
> >
> > On 7/4/06, Luca Garulli <l.g...@pr...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> yes, maven2ization is too much important for Roma...
> >>
> >> Release 1.0 alpha should be appears at the begin of September ;-)
>


-- 
http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com
http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni