Menu
▾
▴
rocketworkbench-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Antoine L. <ant...@po...> - 2005-01-29 15:51:53
|
Hi guys, sorry for the long delay. I have been really busy latetely. Well, I did change the status of Duncan McDonald on the sourceforge web site. He is now admin and have access to all the projects files, etc. If there is any other thing you would like me to do, please ask. Else, good luck in your future projects. -- Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: Hans O. T. <ho...@vi...> - 2005-01-27 22:01:32
|
Somewhat off topic, but I have now uploaded a Linux version of cpropepshell for Intel PC's. It requires gtk. For the moment it is only the excuteable along with cpropep and a couple of examples, but the plan is to publish the source code when (and this is unfortunealty no yet the case) I can compile and run the same source code under both Linux and Win32. Try it out: http://www.dark.dk/download/Cpropepshell.tar.bz2 Hans Olaf Toft |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2005-01-08 05:14:09
|
Hi, I'm happy to take it on, but whatever. FYI, there are only 7 members on the whole list today (http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?group_id=2296). Arocket is really the main area for discussion, conjecture, and gab fests and the Rocketworkbench list is ancillary to Arocket for more focused discussions. That is what I have seen over the course of Rocketworkbench anyway. Rocketworkbench is primarily a storage repostory for project info. It is a little different than the typical SF project with respect to the mailing list because it really grew out of Arocket. Thanks to Antoine for his hard work on Rocketworkbench and completion of CPropep, Grain Design, and Rockflight. I hope many more projects are completed! Duncan > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li... > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > Behalf Of Geoff O'Callaghan > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:11 PM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: Re: [Rocketworkbench] project administrator > > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:13 -0500, Antoine Lefebvre wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > [snip] > > I have no problem with Duncan taking on the main project > admin role... It seems that 3 of us have discussed it... I'm > not sure how many are actually subscribed to the list - > perhaps we have a quorum already :-) > > Cheers > Geoff > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from > ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, > almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > |
|
From: Ray R. <ar0...@ya...> - 2005-01-08 03:48:07
|
--- Geoff O'Callaghan <ge...@st...> wrote: > I have no problem with Duncan taking on the main > project admin role... > It seems that 3 of us have discussed it... I'm not > sure how many are > actually subscribed to the list - perhaps we have a > quorum already :-) Add my vote to the collection. In general about the admin job, all candidates sound well qualified and enthusiastic. Many thanks to Antoine for setting the RWB project in the first place. Ad Astra, Ray __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Hans O. T. <ho...@vi...> - 2005-01-07 18:35:10
|
Happy New Year all! I think that we have a couple of nicely qualified candidates, and having to choose between them is not easy. In general I am not worried about the comming leadership of this project, but rather about how many active contributors will there be... and beyond that, how many people are still subscribed to this until recently dormant list. Assuming that there is still a few people interested in Rocketworkbench, I will note that leading the entire Rocketworkbench is one thing, but each subproject needs a leading person who is familiar with all the details of the sub project in question, and this need not to be the Rocket workbench admin. My own interests lies primarely within software tools for design and post burn/flight analysis and I would like to see solutions that are portable between different software platforms - so the short message is that I vote for Geoff. BTW: A big thanks to Antoine for starting Rocketworkbench - and congratulations on the wedding project ;-) Hans Olaf Toft >Hi everybody, >first of all i wish all of you a happy new years. Well, sorry, i miss= > my own >christmas deadline myself and did not get lots of time as i am actual= >ly >traveling and organising my wedding.... well, both Geoff and Duncan a= >re >seriously interested in the project and wish that one of them take th= >e >administration of the rocketworkbench web site. I would prefer if the >decision come from you. Once done, i=B4ll update the status of your s= >ourceforge >account. > >Have a nice year. > >--=20 >Antoine Lefebvre >ant...@po... > > > > >--__--__-- > >_______________________________________________ >Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list >Roc...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > >End of Rocketworkbench-devel Digest > >. > > > |
|
From: <Ji...@ao...> - 2005-01-07 09:51:50
|
Hello, all, one more here. Jim Swenson, still listening. No opinion on administration, but I do have half an opinion on the HW testing. I suspect the people at SF understand that abstract ideas and formats aren't quite a complete world in themselves. One important purpose of software is to be applied to reality. So it's only reasonable to have a modest number of experimental datasets posted, of relevance distinct from one another, predominantly for the purpose of checking against the software's predictions. When it becomes a gab-fest about 10 kinds of igniter and alternative construction proceedures for them, that's diffferent. When it becomes more about exotic chemicals that don't obey the known mathematical models, than about making math models work in software, that might be different. Or perhaps new models are within workable range, and SW-able math models of chemistry could be considered good open-source discourse, more power to the people, and all. So most discussions of experimental scheduling and methods should be offline email, or posted at another site, which I imagine you could reference from the SF project page. My suggestion is that you establish some such distinction, then go ahead and carry it out and dare someone to object. for that advice, I probably owe you $0.02... Jim S. |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2005-01-07 07:12:29
|
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:13 -0500, Antoine Lefebvre wrote: > Hi everybody, [snip] I have no problem with Duncan taking on the main project admin role... It seems that 3 of us have discussed it... I'm not sure how many are actually subscribed to the list - perhaps we have a quorum already :-) Cheers Geoff |
|
From: Antoine L. <ant...@po...> - 2005-01-06 20:13:06
|
Hi everybody, first of all i wish all of you a happy new years. Well, sorry, i miss= my own christmas deadline myself and did not get lots of time as i am actual= ly traveling and organising my wedding.... well, both Geoff and Duncan a= re seriously interested in the project and wish that one of them take th= e administration of the rocketworkbench web site. I would prefer if the decision come from you. Once done, i=B4ll update the status of your s= ourceforge account. Have a nice year. --=20 Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2005-01-03 07:14:56
|
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 17:40 -0800, Duncan McDonald wrote: > Hi Geoff and Everyone, > [snip] > > What do you folks think? Geoff, from your email you seem to be of the mind > to keep Rocketworkbench SW only as far as I can see. > No, not at all. I'm happy for the combo if a) SF doesn't care or a precedence has already been set and b) it's within the stated goals of the project. I was simply putting forward the documented project goals and the stated purpose of SF.net. If the goal needs to be extended then the community can decide. > Happy New Year to all, and may you complete all of the projects you start > this year! > That'd be nice :-) -goc- |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2005-01-03 01:40:39
|
Hi Geoff and Everyone, Good point on the HW versus SW angle and it is worth discussing. First, although SF is strictly speaking a SW development forum, there are lots = of combined hardware/software projects (autopilot, robotics, R/C, etc). The ignitor will have (in the not too distant future!) a microcontroller = with code stored in flash and other avionic assemblies will undoubtedly have = both HW and SW so that fits reasonably well with SF. On the other hand there = is lots of rocket stuff that is purely mechanical but would still be open source. Furthermore, even purely mechanical designs need to be = documented and revision controlled, and CSV is very handy for that. Sourceforge = seems kind of convenient for all types of designs in my mind, but the most important point is that I would vastly prefer to keep all of Arockets community efforts in one place whether it be pure software for rocket development (simulation, propulsion, CFD, etc), HW/SW for avionic or electromechanical, or pure hardware. I guess the alternative to SF is to create a project area on Arocket that has CSV for version control.=20 What do you folks think? Geoff, from your email you seem to be of the = mind to keep Rocketworkbench SW only as far as I can see. Happy New Year to all, and may you complete all of the projects you = start this year! Duncan > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li...=20 > [mailto:roc...@li...] On=20 > Behalf Of Geoff O'Callaghan > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 4:47 PM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: Re: [Rocketworkbench] project administrator >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:12 -0500, Antoine Lefebvre wrote: > > Hi rocket developpers and reserchers! > > I have receive email from three persons that would like to=20 > be project=20 > > administrator of the rocketworkbench project. > >=20 >=20 > Hi, =20 >=20 > It looks like the xmas rush caught me as well. >=20 > Like Duncan, my goal is to keep rocketworkbench going as an=20 > open source > resource for all. =20 >=20 > However, initially, I didn't see how the entire Biprop=20 > igniter project fits into the ideals of the rocketworkbench=20 > project as it is supposed to be for the development of rocket=20 > design software - some aspects of it > does. See http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net/goal.phtml >=20 > What I would like to see is the development of a design tools that > integrate well to allow for rapid software based=20 > design/prototyping. =20 >=20 > Software based prototyping is worthless unless the results=20 > can be validated by actual testing - so rocketworkbench will=20 > need hardware testing.... Perhaps that's where the goals of=20 > projects like the Biprop igniter fits into things. ie. =20 > Hardware developed to provide unit testing for the software=20 > :-) Don't get me wrong - the Biprop igniter project is good=20 > stuff, I'm just conscious of the goals of the SF website -=20 > An open source software development website - and of the > stated goals of the rocketworkbench project. =20 >=20 > I like the idea of a community based rocketry site, but I=20 > don't think SF.net is the place. =20 >=20 > I hope everyone had a great xmas/new year >=20 > Cheers > Geoff >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues=20 > Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from=20 > ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well,=20 > almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list=20 > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel >=20 |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2005-01-03 00:47:31
|
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:12 -0500, Antoine Lefebvre wrote: > Hi rocket developpers and reserchers! > I have receive email from three persons that would like to be project > administrator of the rocketworkbench project. > Hi, It looks like the xmas rush caught me as well. Like Duncan, my goal is to keep rocketworkbench going as an open source resource for all. However, initially, I didn't see how the entire Biprop igniter project fits into the ideals of the rocketworkbench project as it is supposed to be for the development of rocket design software - some aspects of it does. See http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net/goal.phtml What I would like to see is the development of a design tools that integrate well to allow for rapid software based design/prototyping. Software based prototyping is worthless unless the results can be validated by actual testing - so rocketworkbench will need hardware testing.... Perhaps that's where the goals of projects like the Biprop igniter fits into things. ie. Hardware developed to provide unit testing for the software :-) Don't get me wrong - the Biprop igniter project is good stuff, I'm just conscious of the goals of the SF website - An open source software development website - and of the stated goals of the rocketworkbench project. I like the idea of a community based rocketry site, but I don't think SF.net is the place. I hope everyone had a great xmas/new year Cheers Geoff |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2004-12-30 03:54:59
|
Well I guess I missed the Christmas deadline! However, my interest in Rocketworkbench is to keep it going as an open source resource for both software and hardware for amateur rocketry. I have been working on (and blogging at Rocketworkbench) my biprop ignitor for the last year or so. = In 2005 I hope to add an open source altimeter project for rocket amateurs = at the site. This last year I have pretty much been maintaining the site, including a partial rebuild when about half of the files mysteriously disappeared. Fortunately I had back everything up! I really like the = idea of having a single web resource as opposed to eveeryone using their own web sites, so I am happy to contribute to Rocketworkbench. Duncan > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li...=20 > [mailto:roc...@li...] On=20 > Behalf Of Antoine Lefebvre > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:12 PM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] project administrator >=20 >=20 > Hi rocket developpers and reserchers! > I have receive email from three persons that would like to be=20 > project administrator of the rocketworkbench project. >=20 > Ben Wheeler - be...@go... > Geoff O'Callaghan - ge...@st... > Duncan McDonald - du...@fa... >=20 > If there aren't any other propositions, I propose that each=20 > of them expose shortly their interest in the project and that=20 > we make a choice together. I am here until christmas and then=20 > leave for a month. I would like to clear this issue before=20 > but can do it after if it is too quick.=20 >=20 > Chow >=20 > --=20 > Antoine Lefebvre > ant...@po... >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from=20 > real users. Discover which products truly live up to the=20 > hype. Start reading now.=20 > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list=20 > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel >=20 |
|
From: Antoine L. <ant...@po...> - 2004-12-21 20:11:35
|
Hi rocket developpers and reserchers! I have receive email from three persons that would like to be project administrator of the rocketworkbench project. Ben Wheeler - be...@go... Geoff O'Callaghan - ge...@st... Duncan McDonald - du...@fa... If there aren't any other propositions, I propose that each of them expose shortly their interest in the project and that we make a choice together. I am here until christmas and then leave for a month. I would like to clear this issue before but can do it after if it is too quick. Chow -- Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2004-12-09 05:43:30
|
OK, sounds good. Duncan > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li... > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > Behalf Of Antoine Lefebvre > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 11:10 PM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: Re: [Rocketworkbench] project leader > > > I am happy that you are interested to do so. I think we > should wait for a week or so in case there are other persons > that wish to take on this responsability. > > One the decision have been taken i'll set the administrator > as Project Manager > on the sourceforge web site. > > Antoine > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:19:43PM -0800, Duncan McDonald wrote: > > Although I am more of a hardware person, I certainly want > to see the > > Rocketworkbench continue as a repository of open source rocket > > projects, with eithr software or hardware content or both. > > > > I would be happy to take over as Project Administrator. > > > > Duncan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: roc...@li... > > > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > > > Behalf Of Antoine Lefebvre > > > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:59 AM > > > To: roc...@li... > > > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] project leader > > > > > > > > > The Rocketworkbench Project need a new owner to maintain the > > > web site and organise the evolution of the softwares. My > > > research interest changes over time and I am actully > > > investing most of my time in musical acoustic. > > > > > > I wish somebody could take the task of continuing the effort > > > of free software in the field of rocketry. I have some > > > software in development and reserah documents I can provide. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > -- > > > Antoine Lefebvre > > > ant...@po... > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from > > > real users. Discover which products truly live up to the > > > hype. Start reading now. > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > > > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > > > Roc...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > > users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start > > reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > > Roc...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > -- > Antoine Lefebvre > ant...@po... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from > real users. Discover which products truly live up to the > hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > |
|
From: Antoine L. <ant...@po...> - 2004-12-08 07:07:53
|
I am happy that you are interested to do so. I think we should wait for a week or so in case there are other persons that wish to take on this responsability. One the decision have been taken i'll set the administrator as Project Manager on the sourceforge web site. Antoine On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:19:43PM -0800, Duncan McDonald wrote: > Although I am more of a hardware person, I certainly want to see the > Rocketworkbench continue as a repository of open source rocket projects, > with eithr software or hardware content or both. > > I would be happy to take over as Project Administrator. > > Duncan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: roc...@li... > > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > > Behalf Of Antoine Lefebvre > > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:59 AM > > To: roc...@li... > > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] project leader > > > > > > The Rocketworkbench Project need a new owner to maintain the > > web site and organise the evolution of the softwares. My > > research interest changes over time and I am actully > > investing most of my time in musical acoustic. > > > > I wish somebody could take the task of continuing the effort > > of free software in the field of rocketry. I have some > > software in development and reserah documents I can provide. > > > > Thank you. > > > > -- > > Antoine Lefebvre > > ant...@po... > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from > > real users. Discover which products truly live up to the > > hype. Start reading now. > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > > Roc...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel -- Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2004-12-07 03:19:38
|
Although I am more of a hardware person, I certainly want to see the Rocketworkbench continue as a repository of open source rocket projects, with eithr software or hardware content or both. I would be happy to take over as Project Administrator. Duncan > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li... > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > Behalf Of Antoine Lefebvre > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:59 AM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] project leader > > > The Rocketworkbench Project need a new owner to maintain the > web site and organise the evolution of the softwares. My > research interest changes over time and I am actully > investing most of my time in musical acoustic. > > I wish somebody could take the task of continuing the effort > of free software in the field of rocketry. I have some > software in development and reserah documents I can provide. > > Thank you. > > -- > Antoine Lefebvre > ant...@po... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from > real users. Discover which products truly live up to the > hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > |
|
From: Antoine L. <ant...@po...> - 2004-12-06 08:56:07
|
The Rocketworkbench Project need a new owner to maintain the web site and organise the evolution of the softwares. My research interest changes over time and I am actully investing most of my time in musical acoustic. I wish somebody could take the task of continuing the effort of free software in the field of rocketry. I have some software in development and reserah documents I can provide. Thank you. -- Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: 2ndstage <2nd...@co...> - 2003-06-25 23:25:21
|
I'm here as well again mainly because of the igniter project on AR Kind of interesting to see some people following the same lines together Michael Williams Potrocs, Amarillo TX -----Original Message----- From: roc...@li... [mailto:roc...@li...]On Behalf Of Duncan McDonald Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 11:32 AM To: 'Hans Olaf Toft'; roc...@li... Subject: RE: [Rocketworkbench] Re: New List Member I'm here too! Mainly because of the igniter project on arocket. However, I have had to use propep quite a bit this year and see several areas for improvement so maybe there is some group work on cpropep in the future. I tried using cpropep but immediatley ran into a hard limit (200?) of reactants that can be listed in the .daf file. My .daf is bigger than that. I could go on and on about propep and it's shortcomings. My big hope is that Rocketworkbench will host lots more open source hardware as well as software projects for experimental rocketry. Duncan McDonald > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li... > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > Behalf Of Hans Olaf Toft > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:00 AM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] Re: New List Member > > > Hi Thom > > Welcome to the Rocket Workbench. > > This list has been so quiet, that I have been wondering if I was the > only subscriber - now I know that we are at least 2 :-)) > > Are there any other subscribers ....? > -If so, are anybody working on cpropep or other softwares? I am > currently looking at making cpropepshell run on Linux (for PC's only). > > Hans Olaf Toft > > >Today's Topics: > > > > 1. New List Member (Thomas M. Mcgaffey) > > > >--__--__-- > > > >Message: 1 > >Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:21:18 -0700 > >From: "Thomas M. Mcgaffey" <th...@en...> > >To: roc...@li... > >Subject: [Rocketworkbench] New List Member > > > >Hi Group, > > > >I am new to this list, have been with Arocket for years. > > > >Respectfully > > > >Thom > > > >Thomas M. McGaffey > >Energy Release Systems > >San Jose, California > >th...@en... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU > Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You > Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting > http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list Roc...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel |
|
From: Duncan M. <du...@fa...> - 2003-06-21 16:32:02
|
I'm here too! Mainly because of the igniter project on arocket. However, I have had to use propep quite a bit this year and see several areas for improvement so maybe there is some group work on cpropep in the future. I tried using cpropep but immediatley ran into a hard limit (200?) of reactants that can be listed in the .daf file. My .daf is bigger than that. I could go on and on about propep and it's shortcomings. My big hope is that Rocketworkbench will host lots more open source hardware as well as software projects for experimental rocketry. Duncan McDonald > -----Original Message----- > From: roc...@li... > [mailto:roc...@li...] On > Behalf Of Hans Olaf Toft > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:00 AM > To: roc...@li... > Subject: [Rocketworkbench] Re: New List Member > > > Hi Thom > > Welcome to the Rocket Workbench. > > This list has been so quiet, that I have been wondering if I was the > only subscriber - now I know that we are at least 2 :-)) > > Are there any other subscribers ....? > -If so, are anybody working on cpropep or other softwares? I am > currently looking at making cpropepshell run on Linux (for PC's only). > > Hans Olaf Toft > > >Today's Topics: > > > > 1. New List Member (Thomas M. Mcgaffey) > > > >--__--__-- > > > >Message: 1 > >Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:21:18 -0700 > >From: "Thomas M. Mcgaffey" <th...@en...> > >To: roc...@li... > >Subject: [Rocketworkbench] New List Member > > > >Hi Group, > > > >I am new to this list, have been with Arocket for years. > > > >Respectfully > > > >Thom > > > >Thomas M. McGaffey > >Energy Release Systems > >San Jose, California > >th...@en... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU > Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU > Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You > Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting > http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php > > _______________________________________________ > http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net > Rocketworkbench-devel mailing list > Roc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rocketworkbench-devel > > |
|
From: Hans O. T. <ho...@vi...> - 2003-06-21 07:43:44
|
Hi Thom Welcome to the Rocket Workbench. This list has been so quiet, that I have been wondering if I was the only subscriber - now I know that we are at least 2 :-)) Are there any other subscribers ....? -If so, are anybody working on cpropep or other softwares? I am currently looking at making cpropepshell run on Linux (for PC's only). Hans Olaf Toft >Today's Topics: > > 1. New List Member (Thomas M. Mcgaffey) > >--__--__-- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:21:18 -0700 >From: "Thomas M. Mcgaffey" <th...@en...> >To: roc...@li... >Subject: [Rocketworkbench] New List Member > >Hi Group, > >I am new to this list, have been with Arocket for years. > >Respectfully > >Thom > >Thomas M. McGaffey >Energy Release Systems >San Jose, California >th...@en... > > > > |
|
From: Thomas M. M. <th...@en...> - 2003-05-21 06:21:10
|
Hi Group, I am new to this list, have been with Arocket for years. Respectfully Thom Thomas M. McGaffey Energy Release Systems San Jose, California th...@en... |
|
From: Antoine L. <an...@st...> - 2001-10-16 18:07:13
|
Hi everybody, a bug in the frozen performance calculation of Cpropep have recently been found by Gunterio German Heineken. The bug have been fixed. The new version of the executable for windows can be download at http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/rocketworkbench/cpropep-win-1.1.zip The web interface have also been fixed (http://rocketworkbench.sourceforge.net/equil.phtml) Thank you for using Cpropep. -- Antoine Lefebvre ant...@po... |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2001-10-15 22:55:21
|
The word is getting out! ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [jo...@fi...: Debian Weekly News - October 15th, 2001] Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:18:32 +1000 From: Hamish Moffatt <ha...@cl...> To: ge...@st... Hi Geoff, Just in case you haven't seen it, rocketworkbench got a mention in the 'notable new packages' in this week's Debian Weekly news... it's quite amusing. cheers, Hamish ----- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <jo...@fi...> ----- X-Envelope-Sender: jo...@fi... Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:34:30 +0200 From: Martin Schulze <jo...@fi...> To: Debian News Channel <deb...@li...> Subject: Debian Weekly News - October 15th, 2001 Reply-To: Martin Schulze <jo...@in...> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Weekly News http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/26/ Debian Weekly News - October 15th, 2001 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Misdirected German Translation. We are awfully sorry, but due to a mistake made by Joey the To: address was mistyped when he wanted to post the German translation of the last issue of Debian Weekly News to the German list. Unfortunately it has been distributed to the international list instead, causing some people to wonder what they're reading. Again, sorry for that. Problems with Automake. A new version of automake has been entered the unstable archive. Unfortunately this version causes the build system to behave like one could expect from the name - it's [1]unstable. Version 1.5 of automake is not backwards compatible to version 1.4, even though that was a [2]goal. As a result of this a lot of packages cannot be compiled anymore, like all of KDE. A solution is due soon. Additionally, Neil Spring posted some [3]statistics about building packages with automake 1.4 and 1.5. Long Perl Module Naming. The current policy with regard to the naming scheme for Perl modules is quite clear: Foo::Bar becomes libfoo-bar-perl. This is fine for normal modules, however, there are also modules awailable that contain [4]Business::OnlinePayment::BankOfAmerica, which in turn becomes libbusiness-onlinepayment-bankofamerica-perl as package name. This name is so long that it's a pain to type and dpkg -l wouldn't display it entirely. Joey Hess made a [5]proposal to remove foolish consistency in Perl module names. Debian Conference 2 in Bordeaux? The organisation of the [6]Libre Software Meeting 2002 has [7]begun, which will take place from July 9th to 13th, 2002. As in past years, it is possible to organise a Debian Conference at the same time but someone needs to lead the organisation of it. Last year Thierry Laronde was kind enough to work on it, but he can't organise another one this year. If you are interested please get in touch with or...@ls.... Compiling OpenOffice. Peter Novodvorsky posted a [8]mini HOWTO describing how to get OpenOffice 638C compiled. You'll need a newer JDK from Blackdown.org and older STLPort packages. Peter added a couple of helpful links and patches to the document. Webalizer stopped Working? If you noticed that webalizer from stable does not create website statistics anymore, you may be trapped into [9]this. Older versions of the Webalizer (version 1.30 through 2.00-12) generated timestamps in a fashion that, on most platforms, would overflow on October 5, 2001. The result is that statistics are generated up until midnight of October 4th, but not after. The current release of webalizer doesn't contain this bug. A patch against the version from stable is available, linked from the mail above, as well as a [10]backport of the current version. The maintainer also [11]prepares an upload of corrected packages for into stable. Branden got Heartburn. In our last issue we reported about problems with SDL packages and Branden Robinsons attempt to fix them. This was suddenly interrupted by problems introduced by a new version of automake (see above). Finally Branden was able to fix the problems with help of two collegues from [12]Progeny Linux Systems and [13]uploaded NMU packages. Java 2 Standard Edition for Debian? Blackdown Java 2 was recently uploaded targeted for non-free. James Troup, our fearless ftp-master would like some second opinions on the [14]license. An interesting term reads "do not distribute additional software intended to replace any component(s) of the Software". Presumably things like kaffe, jikes and gcj constitute software intended to replace j2sdk, j2se, which makes it difficult not to breach the above rule. Stephen Zander [15]pointed out that Blackdown has been given permission by Sun to alter the terms of the licence to allow the redistribution of Blackdown released binaries by Blackdown mirrors and Linux distributions, not just Debian, regardless of whatever else they may distribute. Finally, these packages may end up in non-free at least. New Apache2 Packages Delayed. Daniel Stone [16]announced that new Apache2 packages will hit the archive soon. However, apache2 is packaged in a different manner and uses a completely different directory layout (for details, check the link above). Too many people have raised concerns about these changes resulting in a [17]delay uploading packages. Free Truetype Fonts? Erich Schubert [18]contacted an author of some freeware and asked him, if he could licence them under an open source licence. His reply didn't exactly show that he read the provided [19]DSFG. While not being sure if the license would allow the inclusion in Debian/main a discussion started on licensing artwork contrary to software. When Do Packages Get into Testing? A couple of [20]requests showed us that many people still aren't sure when a package is intended to enter the testing distribution. Anthony Towns posted an [21]explanation about packages and testing. The basic rule is that a package has to be tested for two weeks (without critical bugs and new uploads) and that all of its binary packages have been recompiled for all architectures that are scheduled for testing. Splitting non-US in "crypto" And "patents"? Sunnanvind Briling Fenderson came up with an [22]idea to split the non-US archive up into a "crypto" and a "patents" piece. Different countries have different laws. This could terminate all the "put crypto in main" talk because US based entities could distribute "crypto" and "main", while French (for example) could distribute "main" and "patents". Amicus Brief for Matt Pavlovich's Court Case. Branden Robinson spoke with Allonn Levy on the phone a couple of weeks ago, and he asked us to draft an [23]Amicus Brief ("friend of the court") document for submission to the California Supreme Court, who are currently deciding whether to hear Matt's appeal on jurisdictional grounds. [24]Levy is Matt's attorny in the DVD CCA v. Bunner, et al. suit. The [25]Electronic Frontier Foundation has [26]details. Directions to Using Autoconf and Friends. Henrique de Moraes Holschuh released a [27]document in which he describes how autoconf/automake is best used in Debian. The whole GNU autotools stuff is a hairy topic, but if we don't document how to best use them somewhere, it will only get worse. Debian is very Popular! Several readers wrote in to say that Debian came in second in [28]Linux Journal's Reader's Choice Awards. Debian is moving up, having placed fourth in the Awards last year. Good News... The W3C received enough 11th-hour negative feedback to keep the odious proposed Patent Policy from sailing through. Daniel J. Weitzner [29]announced how the Policy Working Group will proceed. The most notable change is the representation of the Free Software/Open Source community on the Working Group. Bruce Perens (who should need no introduction) and Eben Moglen (General Counsel for the Free Software Foundation) will be joining as "invited experts." Turnabout is Fair Play. The folks at [30]Linux Weekly News are always kind enough to post links to the latest DWN, and do a really fine job of reporting news from and about the Linux Community so we thought we'd give them a mention this week. Given recent cutbacks by Tucows, it looks like LWN might be in a bit of a pickle [31]financially. They've set up a [32]discussion list to help think up ways that LWN might continue. If you're just joining the discussion, please read the archives before throwing in your suggestions. Not only is LWN consistently excellent, the crew that puts it together are good people. We wish them luck. New or noteworthy packages: * [33]ipac-ng -- Inserts iptables rules to classify network traffic and monitors these rules for kernels >= 2.4.0. * [34]kvdr, [35]dvb-mpegtools, [36]dvb-zapping, [37]vdr, [38]vdr-daemon, [39]vdr-lirc, [40]vdr-kbd and [41]vdr-rcu -- Viewers and video disk recorders for DVB and DVB-S cards. * [42]kmerlin -- If you must use the MSN Messenger network, you can use the KMerlin client for Linux. * [43]ntaim -- A curses-based AIM client. * [44]rocketworkbench -- Utilities to -- and we're not making this up -- help design experimental rockets. Please use responsibly. That's all folks! That's all we have for this week. Drop us a line at [45]dw...@de... if you have any comments, questions or news tips. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- References 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00492.html 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00495.html 3. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00646.html 4. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/libbusiness-onlinepayment-b ankofamerica-perl.html 5. http://bugs.debian.org/114920 6. http://lsm.abul.org/ 7. http://lists.debian.org/debian-events-eu-0110/msg00053.html 8. http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice-0110/msg00014.html 9. http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp-0110/msg00123.html 10. http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp-0110/msg00109.html 11. http://lists.debian.org/debian-isp-0110/msg00180.html 12. http://www.progeny.com/ 13. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00675.html 14. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0110/msg00024.html 15. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0110/msg00055.html 16. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00686.html 17. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00759.html 18. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0110/msg00059.html 19. http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines 20. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00652.html 21. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0008/msg00906.html 22. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0110/msg00047.html 23. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0110/msg00040.html 24. http://www.hsapc.com/ 25. http://www.eff.org/ 26. http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DVDCCA_case/20010808_eff_pavlovich_pr.html 27. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0110/msg00773.html 28. http://www2.linuxjournal.com/lj-issues/issue91/5441.html 29. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/1559.ht ml 30. http://www.lwn.net/ 31. http://lwn.net/2001/1011/ 32. http://vena.lwn.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion 33. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/ipac-ng.html 34. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/kvdr.html 35. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/dvb-mpegtools.html 36. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/dvb-zapping.html 37. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/vdr.html 38. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/vdr-daemon.html 39. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/vdr-lirc.html 40. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/vdr-kbd.html 41. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/vdr-rcu.html 42. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/kmerlin.html 43. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/ntaim.html 44. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/rocketworkbench.html 45. mailto:dw...@de... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb...@li... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis...@li... ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> ------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2001-10-15 22:51:39
|
Greetings, I wrote the following BUILD instructions for rocketworkbench. ie. Briefly what you need to do to build rocketworkbench from the source. I suggest it go into rocketworkbench/BUILD Anyway... here it is for comment. It is missing the download location for GPCP. Cheers Geoff ps.. Here's a patch to adjust the sources/libraries/Makefile to build gpcp when you've downloaded it. diff --exclude=CVS/* -rc --new-file rocketworkbench/rocketworkbench/source/libraries/Makefile rocketworkbench-new/rocketworkbench/source/libraries/Makefile *** rocketworkbench/rocketworkbench/source/libraries/Makefile Fri Jul 20 13:19:00 2001 --- rocketworkbench-new/rocketworkbench/source/libraries/Makefile Tue Oct 16 08:48:39 2001 *************** *** 9,14 **** --- 9,19 ---- all: @echo " --------------------" + @echo " Compiling gpcp ..." + @echo " --------------------" + @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C gpcp all + + @echo " --------------------" @echo " Compiling libnum ..." @echo " --------------------" @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libnum all *************** *** 50,55 **** --- 55,62 ---- clean: + @echo " Cleaning gpcp ..." + @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C gpcp clean @echo " Cleaning libnum..." @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libnum clean @echo " Cleaning libcpropep..." |
|
From: Geoff O'C. <ge...@st...> - 2001-10-15 12:06:00
|
Hi, Here's a minor patch to the top-level makefile to allow it to build in a 'fresh' download. It just adds mkdirs to the lib and bin directories as they must exist. Cheers Geoff *** Makefile Mon Oct 15 20:26:32 2001 --- Makefile.new Mon Oct 15 20:26:51 2001 *************** *** 19,24 **** --- 19,26 ---- profile: all all: + @mkdir -p lib + @mkdir -p bin @echo "Building sources in" $(TYPE) "mode." @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C source all |
