From: Sahananda (J. W. <sah...@wi...> - 2011-04-14 17:54:06
|
The ooRexx charter allows for an Architect and a Test Manager as well as the two roles I included. I think a tester is an excellent idea, but didn't imagine anyone would want to take it on, particularly at this point, so left room for the roles to grow as apropriate. Are you saying you would be interested in such a role if it was there? Jon On 14 April 2011 15:31, Robert Hamilton <bob...@gm...> wrote: > For what it's worth, I see nothing wrong with the Charter -- but should > there be a Tester Function in the Membership Section? > > Robert L Hamilton > Richardson, Texas USA > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Mark Miesfeld <mie...@gm...> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ven & Carolyn Ilagan < >> vi...@bi...> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the link, Mark. I've downloaded the pdf already and my main >>> comment is that the "charter" makes the presumption that all the >>> "Committers" have extensive knowledge of the CPL v1.0 (which I am not), >>> >> >> Sort of true, but I wouldn't say extensive knowledge. >> >> >> >>> in which case, any contribution of mine will have to be screened by the >>> rest of the group first to see if the code is compliant with that CPL. >>> >> >> If the contribution is your own code, or your own writing in the case of >> the docs, then you can just contribute it. As long as you agree that it is >> going to be open source, i.e. possibly distributed to others and you can not >> bring a copyright infringement lawsuit against them >> >> In other words, as long as its you own code and you are willing to >> contribute it, there is no problem. >> >> In the case that you are copying code from some one else, well you >> probably shouldn't do that. However, if they have given others the >> permission to use it, then you could get help from the group on whether it >> is acceptable. For example, I don't think you can contribute code that you >> copied from a GPL code, because I believe GPL is more restrictive than CPL. >> >> >> >>> >>> Ven >>> PS: Any shortcut links to brief rules of CPL? >>> >> >> >> Here's a link to the file with the full version of the CPL: >> >> >> http://rexxtill.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rexxtill/RexxTill/trunk/CPLv1.0.txt?view=log >> >> here's a link to file that contains an abbreviation of the license in its >> header, as will be used by our source files: >> >> >> http://rexxtill.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rexxtill/RexxTill/trunk/keypad.cls?view=log >> >> view revision 12 or later. >> >> -- >> Mark Miesfeld >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload >> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top >> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve >> application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about >> boosting >> the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Rexxtill-devel mailing list >> Rex...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rexxtill-devel >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Rexxtill-devel mailing list > Rex...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rexxtill-devel > > |