Menu
▾
▴
reqsman-general — General reqsman discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Geelbe <ge...@en...> - 2011-09-12 20:03:45
|
Azucena Garcia te hace esta invitación exclusiva a Geelbe, el Club Privado de Compras por Internet ¡Para que compres Marcas Reconocidas con grandes Descuentos! Azucena, te invita a participar en Geelbe, el Club Privado de Compras por Internet que te permite acceder a ventas de Marcas Reconocidas con hasta el 70% de descuento con respecto a los precios del mercado tradicional, y ¡además te regala $50 para que utilices en tu primera compra! Haz clic en el siguiente enlace para aceptar la invitación de Azucena Garcia: http://www.geelbe.com/mx/registro/member-get-member/mgm_index.html?ema...@li...&cod...@gm... |
|
From: <sas...@gm...> - 2006-06-26 22:02:48
|
Can you to provide some manual of users for the tool of requirements (DRES)? Thank you, Susy Garc=EDa |
|
From: Matthew E. <men...@me...> - 2003-06-21 01:53:06
|
<html> <body> <font size=3>Hi Nayar-<br><br> No work is currently being done on this project. Do you have any thoughts to move it forward?<br><br> Sorry for the late response. :(<br><br> -Matt<br><br> <br> At 4/23/2003 11:20 AM, Nayar Srikumar-ESN005 wrote:<br> </font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Hi all,</font><font size=3><br> </font><font face="arial" size=2>My name is Sri Nayar, I work for Motorola.</font><font size=3><br> </font><font face="arial" size=2>I found your project listed in sourceforge. I am very interested in this and would like to know the current status.</font><font size=3><br> </font><font face="arial" size=2>Thanks..sri</font><font size=3></font></blockquote></body> </html> |
|
From: Nayar Srikumar-E. <Sri...@mo...> - 2003-04-23 16:20:53
|
Hi all, My name is Sri Nayar, I work for Motorola. I found your project listed in sourceforge. I am very interested in this and would like to know the current status. Thanks..sri |
|
From: Jan M. <jm...@im...> - 2002-07-21 16:06:35
|
I am interested in software tools for managing requirements, like you planned. Are you still working on the project? Jan Meijer |
|
From: Mark A. <ma...@au...> - 2002-02-20 04:42:54
|
Just thought I would throw my 2 cents worth in. I have started (although I am admittedly not very far yet) on an actual technical design and requirements doc to address some of the thought that Matt and I have discussed. I doubt for this project it will ever get too detailed but what it to be enough that when someone joins they have something to serve as a bit of a technical and functional roadmap. I hope to have something to share in about 2 weeks. I am currently being 'beaten down by the software gods' as you put it. Although it really does appear that there is a reasonable end in sight, but that is another story. As for platform, I am probably in the minority on source forge in saying this but I actually like windows compared with the various unix flavors. Although that is probably just due to familiarity with Windows vs. *nix environments. That lack of familiarity however, along with the desire to get something to help me in my own projects, is part of the 'itch I would like to scratch' in taking on this project. Even though I don't feel trapped by windows, I am a huge java fan and that is the direction I am taking my design. I have seen the code that I have developed (on a windows box) be deployed and run flawlessly on everything from another NT server to a Linux box to an IBM OS/390 mainframe. With that said it really shouldn't matter what platform you want to run the final product on so long as it has a reasonable jdk / jre. If anyone wants to post some ideas to the mailing list on what you would like to see this beast do I will get them included in the first draft of the requirements doc. In the next couple of days I will start posting individual requirements to the mailing list to see if we can generate some discussion. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Matthew England [mailto:men...@me...] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:00 PM To: Geoff Glasson Cc: req...@li...; ma...@us...; men...@me... Subject: Re: Requirements Manager (reqsman.sf.net) update Hi Geoff- (i hope you don't mind my lack-of-capitalization for informal letters...i find in can write faster this way.) Geoff writes: > I am currently working on a project that is > suffering from poor requirements management, and since I am having to lead > the way out of the s**t, I am very keen to develop something that will assist > me in future. you're not alone. i have received several inquiries from people, and most of them have been "beaten down" by the software-project gods. i take that you have, too. if so, i share the pain. i don't want to mislead you though; i doubt that our work will lead to anything usable within the next 6 months...and this number is just a guess. (i define "usable" as providing a project/product manager with reasonably confidence to use the tool on an actual, money-making project.) so i simply warn you in advance that if you're looking for short-term help with your existing stuff, this project (reqsman) probably will not be your best bet. please let me know if you are looking for this kind of help, and i can give you some pointers ('cause i'm already in this sort of position). you might also want to look at other projects like NEORMS, ReqMaster, and The Project Architect, although there doesn't appear to be any more activity going on for these than there are for reqsman. i suspect that the reqsman approach may have a broader perspective and be less tied to software technologies than these other projects...but i'm only speculating. > I have some ideas about what is required and how to implement it but they > haven't progressed all that far yet. i feel implementation fundamentals are important, like avoiding dependence on technologies (like Windows) unless high-level reasons call for it. (for what it's worth, i'm a Unix-lover, too, and disdain Windows...but use Windows because i'm in many cases artificially constrained to do so.) i also feel that it's quite feasible to provide multiple user perspectives (ie, interfaces and modes) to the same services and data served by software. my main concern at this stage is to identify (and have development parties agree upon) what type of user(s) we want to serve now, and possibly discuss what users/needs we might want to serve in the future (i believe the targeted user-type set may grow over time--and i speak in terms of years). i then want to discover our users' goals, and direct our efforts to best serving those user goals. i also find that rarely does a user goal have much to do with underlying implementation technology. fyi: i've found Alan Cooper's "The Inmates are Running the Asylum" (as well as his associated site at http://cooper.com) provides interesting guidance for this kind of thought. throughout development of this kind of stuff, i suspect that user goals may stay stable while the tools and tasks used and executed to reach these goals may change dramatically over time. to this end i expect that, if this becomes a bona fide project and actually takes off with users, the internal guts and implementation may change quite a bit over time. the key for me is to make sure to track these user goals and high-level "business" requirements. > I'm quite interested in taking this somewhere, but would like to see a few > more details before I commit. more things to come. i recommend joining the reqsman mailing list (req...@li...; see the reqsman email lists page for more info). i copy the list with this email. -Matt At 2/19/2002 06:16 AM, Geoff Glasson wrote: Matt, I'm quite interested in taking this somewhere, but would like to see a few more details before I commit. I am currently working on a project that is suffering from poor requirements management, and since I am having to lead the way out of the s**t, I am very keen to develop something that will assist me in future. I have some ideas about what is required and how to implement it but they haven't progressed all that far yet. For instance, I am a UNIX devotee and don't want to develop something specific to Windows, nor do I want to limit the user interface to a specific window manager / toolkit ( I'm a KDE fan ). So if I were to build something like this myself, it would be Java based, perhaps even applet based running off an SQL database. I think that this would give the project the most flexibilty and means that it could be used across multiple platforms. I am quite willing to discuss options with you or anyone else for that matter, and help put together the requirements for this project. Regards...Geoff On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:55, Matthew England wrote: > To: gla...@ii..., nh...@us... > > Per your inquiries about Requirements Manager (reqsman.sf.net), I've posted > a the following note: > > <http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=1489284> > > Hopefully more to come soon. > > -Matt -- Geoff Glasson gla...@ii... |
|
From: Matthew E. <men...@me...> - 2002-02-19 18:58:18
|
<html>
<br><br>
Hi Geoff-<br><br>
(i hope you don't mind my lack-of-capitalization for informal letters...i
find in can write faster this way.)<br><br>
Geoff writes:<br>
> I am currently working on a project that is <br>
> suffering from poor requirements management, and since I am having
to lead <br>
> the way out of the s**t, I am very keen to develop something that
will assist <br>
> me in future.<br><br>
you're not alone. i have received several inquiries from people,
and most of them have been "beaten down" by the
software-project gods. i take that you have, too. if so, i
share the pain.<br><br>
i don't want to mislead you though; i doubt that our work will lead to
anything usable within the next 6 months...and this number is just a
guess. (i define "usable" as providing a project/product
manager with reasonably confidence to use the tool on an actual,
money-making project.) so i simply warn you in advance that if
you're looking for short-term help with your existing stuff, this project
(reqsman) probably will not be your best bet. please let me know if
you are looking for this kind of help, and i can give you some pointers
('cause i'm already in this sort of position).<br><br>
you might also want to look at other projects like
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/neorms/">NEORMS</a>,
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/reqmaster/">ReqMaster</a>,
and<br>
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/projectarchit/">The Project
Architect</a>, although there doesn't appear to be any more activity
going on for these than there are for reqsman. i suspect that the
reqsman approach may have a broader perspective and be less tied to
software technologies than these other projects...but i'm only
speculating.<br><br>
<br>
> I have some ideas about what is required and how to implement it but
they <br>
> haven't progressed all that far yet.<br><br>
i feel implementation fundamentals are important, like avoiding
dependence on technologies (like Windows) unless high-level reasons call
for it. (for what it's worth, i'm a Unix-lover, too, and disdain
Windows...but use Windows because i'm in many cases artificially
constrained to do so.) i also feel that it's quite feasible to
provide multiple user perspectives (ie, interfaces and modes) to the same
services and data served by software.<br><br>
my main concern at this stage is to identify (and have development
parties agree upon) what type of user(s) we want to serve now, and
possibly discuss what users/needs we might want to serve in the future (i
believe the targeted user-type set may grow over time--and i speak in
terms of years). i then want to discover our users' goals, and
direct our efforts to best serving those user goals. i also find
that rarely does a user goal have much to do with underlying
implementation technology. fyi: i've found Alan Cooper's
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0672316498/qid=1014135470/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-3058708-6447012">"The
Inmates are Running the Asylum"</a> (as well as his associated site
at <a href="http://cooper.com/">http://cooper.com</a>) provides
interesting guidance for this kind of thought.<br><br>
throughout development of this kind of stuff, i suspect that user goals
may stay stable while the tools and tasks used and executed to reach
these goals may change dramatically over time. to this end i expect
that, if this becomes a bona fide project and actually takes off with
users, the internal guts and implementation may change quite a bit over
time. the key for me is to make sure to track these user goals and
high-level "business" requirements.<br><br>
> I'm quite interested in taking this somewhere, but would like to see
a few <br>
> more details before I commit. <br><br>
more things to come. i recommend joining the reqsman mailing
list<br>
(req...@li...; see the
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=10327">reqsman email lists
page</a> for more info). i copy the list with this email.<br><br>
-Matt<br><br>
<br><br>
At 2/19/2002 06:16 AM, Geoff Glasson wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Matt,<br><br>
I'm quite interested in taking this somewhere, but would like to see a
few <br>
more details before I commit. I am currently working on a project
that is <br>
suffering from poor requirements management, and since I am having to
lead <br>
the way out of the s**t, I am very keen to develop something that will
assist <br>
me in future.<br><br>
I have some ideas about what is required and how to implement it but they
<br>
haven't progressed all that far yet. For instance, I am a UNIX
devotee and <br>
don't want to develop something specific to Windows, nor do I want to
limit <br>
the user interface to a specific window manager / toolkit ( I'm a KDE fan
). <br>
So if I were to build something like this myself, it would be Java based,
<br>
perhaps even applet based running off an SQL database. I think that
this <br>
would give the project the most flexibilty and means that it could be
used <br>
across multiple platforms.<br><br>
I am quite willing to discuss options with you or anyone else for that
<br>
matter, and help put together the requirements for this
project.<br><br>
Regards...Geoff<br><br>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:55, Matthew England wrote:<br>
> To: gla...@ii..., nh...@us...<br>
><br>
> Per your inquiries about Requirements Manager (reqsman.sf.net), I've
posted<br>
> a the following note:<br>
><br>
>
<<a href="http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=1489284" eudora="autourl">http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=1489284</a>><br>
><br>
> Hopefully more to come soon.<br>
><br>
> -Matt<br><br>
-- <br>
Geoff Glasson<br>
gla...@ii...</blockquote></html>
|
|
From: Matthew E. <mat...@ya...> - 2002-01-16 03:03:03
|
Charles and Kris- I just now noticed your posts from over a year ago (you may or may not remember) to the sf.net "Requirements Manager" project that I created (<http://sourceforge.net/projects/reqsman/>). Your notes provide some of the more-interesting feedback I've seen yet. I'm extremely disappointed that I didn't notice them until now. Do either of you have an interest in continuing the discussion in the Open Forum? I'd be interested in hearing more and also contributing my thoughts. I must apologize that I wasn't actively reading the forums. You may or may not be interested to read the response I sent to another person inquiring about the project. I include it below. It provides a few more details on my perspective for the project. I copy this msg to the general mailing list (req...@li...). Regards, -Matt >Reply-To: "Matthew England" <men...@me...> >X-Sender: mat...@po... >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 >Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:24:39 -0600 >To: Mark Ault <ma...@us...> >From: Matthew England <mat...@ya...> >Subject: Re: Requirements Manager on SourceForge >Cc: men...@me... > >Hi Mark- > > >At 1/14/2002 10:07 PM, Mark Ault wrote: >>I noticed the project you set up on SourceForge. >>I have been thinking about doing something similar >>to what you describe in this project. It appears >>that not much has happened on this project or has >>it just not been done on SF? Would you be willing >>to share whatever thoughts you had if this project >>is not currently active? >> >>Thanks -- Mark > > >Many things for me to say here, so little time. :) > >No, I haven't done anything with this, but I have many thoughts about it, >thoughts which I've formed over some time. You're also not the first >person to ask about this. I appreciate your inquiry! > >If you're comfortable doing so, I invite you to call me if you're >interested in pursuing further. Best number to reach me: >312-543-9916. There's so many thoughts and perspectives to acquire from >both me to you and vice versa that I find an interactive conversation much >easier than email. > >I share a small sampling of thoughts here: > >I believe there is at least one other requirements-manager project on >sourceforge.net (aka sf.net) that I know of >(<http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=127385&forum_id=100371>), >possibly others, you might want to check it out. I also started an email >thread at a popular RM/RE mailing list >(<http://www-staff.it.uts.edu.au/~didar/RE-online.html>) proposing an >open-sourced requirements management tool that generated a lot of >discussion but ultimately didn't spark any real work (check out the email >archives if you like, they are all available, let me know if you would >like help with this). I created the sourceforge.net project around the >time of this discussion. I've also received a few inquiries from others >who have seen the sf.net RM project. I'm considering gathering the email >addresses of those who have inquired and putting them on the sf.net >project emailing list and then starting a real discussion. > >For what it's worth, I'm a DOORS user >(<http://www.telelogic.com/products/doors/>) and am working on >market-requirements-intensive projects for computing technology at my >current company. While I think Telelogic's tool is useful, I think the >technology can be taken to places and used in ways that seem to be far >beyond the work scope and understanding of Telelogic. I've talked with >several Telelogic people about this, most of them seem to agree when I >give them the $.05 summary. > >I find that my vision is usually much broader than those that inquire >about making an open-sourced RM tool, and has in the past detered me from >trying to lead an effort towards said vision. I invite you to call if >you'd like to discuss! > >-Matt >312-543-9916 > > > >_________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Matthew E. <mat...@ya...> - 2002-01-16 02:59:58
|
-matt _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
