Re: [Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Jerome W. <jwa...@bx...>]

Sebastien Chaumat wrote:

>Le mer 30/10/2002 =E0 19:54, Jerome Warnier a =E9crit :
> =20
>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>>>>>>4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>>>>>>      =20
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           =20
>>>>>>
>>>I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
>>>woody package.
>>>=20
>>>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>You don't have to: I already did it.
>>I have working Woody packages since june, working fine, but much tweake=
d.
>>
>>   =20
>>
>
>Send it :)
> =20
>

Arrrrgh!! I just realized my copy is on a laptop running far away from=20
any Internet connection till next Monday!
What I've got corrected was the automatic generation of documentation=20
(or help), which didn't work at all. It was a mix between fixing and=20
disabling components.
Other small fixes were in update_rules.defaults.
I also updated the pci.lst to the last version in discover-data.

I don't remember the other things, but if you wait until Monday, I'd=20
make a cvs diff.
During this time, I suggest to document the items Bernd asked for.

Sorry