Re: [Repast-interest] running in batch model without repast's parameter processing

[Nick C. <nic...@ve...>]

On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 09:24, Rick Riolo wrote:

> I may not understand how it all interacts, but just from
> my quick glance at loadModel() it seems to me
> that if you allowed the 2 parameters
>    "parfile", batchModeFlag
> to fully use the 4 possible combinations, i could get what I want:
>                                   "parfile"
>     batchModeFlag            null               filename
>                      -----------------    ----------------------------
>         true              no-gui               no-gui
>                        user must               process pars as it does now
>                        deal with pars
>                      -----------------------------------------------------
>         false           gui, start as usual    gui, read parameters
>                                                   using repast par tools
> 

I'll look into this. At the moment, the sticking point here is "user
must deal with pars". In the meantime, I'd look into what I suggested.
Also, Mark Diggory at Harvard has done something like what you want
using Ant. I think he as posted what he's done on the list. 

Nick

-- 
Nick Collier 
Social Science Research Computing 
University of Chicago 
http://repast.sourceforge.net