Re: [Repast-developer] protection levels in ScheduleBase, BasicAction

[Andy C. <ac...@ll...>]

p.s. I resolved my problem with BasicAction and it shouldn't have been on 
the subject line...

Andy

At 04:53 PM 4/7/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Dear Repast developers,
>
>For my own project, I am trying to extend Repast's ScheduleBase and 
>Schedule via inheritance, but have run into a problem with protections... 
>Namely, in ScheduleBase, the member function fillGroup is private.
>
>I don't have a tremendous amount of experience with protection levels in 
>Java; I tend to use public or protected when I think of it, and package 
>level when I forget. ;-) So, I suppose question number one is whether or 
>not there are compelling reasons for this particular choice. Question 2 is 
>what would you recommend I do about it? For the time being, I'm going to 
>munge my copy of Repast to make this protected, but I don't want to do 
>that longterm. Is this the forum by which I should ask if that protection 
>can be revisited for the next release?
>
>If there are more elegant solutions, by all means let me know what they 
>are... I'm trying to override the preexecute function to incorporate some 
>(very basic) parallel synchronization. If I'm correct, I don't have to 
>override fillgroup, just call it as is currently being done...
>
>Best,
>Andy
>
>============================================
>Andrew J. Cleary, Software Engineer/Computational Scientist
>Lawrence Livermore National Labs, 925-424-5890.
>============================================
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just 
>$79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or 
>power for your dedicated server
>http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
>_______________________________________________
>Repast-developer mailing list
>Rep...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/repast-developer