|
From: Laszlo G. <gu...@la...> - 2001-12-01 02:51:07
|
Hi Again, Please find my comments below. At 05:38 PM 11/29/01 -0800, Skye Bender-deMoll wrote: >[...] > >I'm not at all familiar with the gis architecture, but one thing to >consider is how the space framework works with the network framework. for >ex, if each spaces is keeping track of its adjacent neighbors, or you have >matrix for looking up neighbors, this is conceptualy identical to a >network, with all associated benifits and problems. (i.e. if you are using >an adjacency matrix, mem requriments go up as the SQUARE of the number of >cells!) Sure. This is a very important point. In the long run, everything should be integrate with the networking framework smoothly. What I would expect is that at the top of the hierarchy we have some core functionality that applies to all spaces. And then, at one point, there is a forking in the tree and the grid-like stuff goes one way, the more general, networking stuff the other. >also, I wonder if it is worth trying to do a bit of look ahead for how the >repast libraries are structred. Will the the concepts under the 2d spaces >still make sense when extened to 3d? In my work, I try to make this sure. My real problem is the parameters. Wherever you need to identify a location, you need to pass the coordinates. And the number of arguments define the signature of the method... But since, I don't have any solution to this and cannot foresee any easy way around it either, I decided to live with it... :-) >webstart stuff sounds damn cool. unfortunatly I've got a bit of a >bandwidth problem havn't looked at it. be cool to bundle up the jinGirNew >demo and tell the authors.. Yeah! I forgot in my last mail. That's really cool! How much work did it take? Gulya >xo, > -skye |