|
From: Eric K. <ek...@rz...> - 2002-05-21 11:18:56
|
"David Welch" <we...@cw...> wrote: > Yes of course, I hadn't considered the possibly that the stack could be > mapped by a lazily allocated page table. I don't think this fixes all the > problems however since, in principle, a thread could be switched to while > it is attached to a different process. Would it be possible to try the > attached patch instead? I saw the same crash yesterday when I came home and tried the latest CVS. Your patch fixes the crash! Thanks, Eric |