Re: [ros-kernel] edit.exe

[Casper H. <ch...@us...>]

s=F8n, 2002-05-19 kl. 17:10 skrev David Welch:
> On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> > Fixed, please try again.
> >=20
> I do not think this fix is correct; we can certainly try to lock an=20
> fast mutex when the current thread doesn't already own it but if the
> current thread does already own it then we will deadlock since fast=20
> mutexes aren't recursive. The real problem is locking the address space
> when we already own it so I had have reverted your changes and modified=20
> section.c not to do this.

Yes, you are right, I wasn't thinking there.