Re: [ros-kernel] edit.exe

[David W. <we...@cw...>]

On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> Fixed, please try again.
> 
I do not think this fix is correct; we can certainly try to lock an 
fast mutex when the current thread doesn't already own it but if the
current thread does already own it then we will deadlock since fast 
mutexes aren't recursive. The real problem is locking the address space
when we already own it so I had have reverted your changes and modified 
section.c not to do this.