Re: [ros-kernel] Fwd: Reorganizing the cvs repositorybeforestarting reactos.org

[Robert K. <ro...@ko...>]

>
> It is the opposite way around. If the low-level user-mode modules are
> shared between subsystem, then there will be less redundancy. E.g. One
> winsock stack (with a thin subsystem specific wrapper) vs. x (=
> #subsystems) winsock stacks communicating with network protocols using a
> TDI (Transport Driver Interface) which is very generic and hard to work
> with. One user-mode graphics library for all subsystems. Etc.
>

This is an argument. Reimplementing a socket lib is not trivial and a windowing system
requires a
common lib (and window space ). Up to now my plans for allowing PM-os2-apps are to use
a win32 server program, which wouldn't be required with user32 as native dll. In that
far I'd prefer
Casper's suggestion

>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
> Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> reactos-kernel mailing list
> rea...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel