|
From: Casper H. <ch...@us...> - 2002-05-18 12:34:39
|
l=F8r, 2002-05-18 kl. 14:19 skrev Robert K.: > I would prefer to use NTdll to implement the OS/2 API. > But maybe I get lazy some day. However I dont like more and even more red= undancy, > that will come with flipping these bits It is the opposite way around. If the low-level user-mode modules are shared between subsystem, then there will be less redundancy. E.g. One winsock stack (with a thin subsystem specific wrapper) vs. x (=3D #subsystems) winsock stacks communicating with network protocols using a TDI (Transport Driver Interface) which is very generic and hard to work with. One user-mode graphics library for all subsystems. Etc. |