Re: [ros-kernel] Fwd: Reorganizing the cvs repository beforestarting reactos.org

[Robert K. <ro...@ko...>]

I would prefer to use NTdll to implement the OS/2 API.
But maybe I get lazy some day. However I dont like more and even more redundancy,
that will come with flipping these bits

Casper Hornstrup schrieb:

> fre, 2002-05-17 kl. 18:57 skrev KJK::Hyperion:
> > At 14.15 17/05/2002, you wrote:
> > > > About Win32: let's leave it to the Wine guys. They've done an impressive
> > > > job, and they're undoubtably way ahead of us on this. I'm talking not only
> > > > of code, but also experience: the extensive research on undocumented
> > > > features and bugs they've done
> > >You earlier said that you were not trying to turn ReactOS into a *nix like
> > >OS. Well I still get the feeling that you are.
> >
> > Sorry, but I think you don't get the difference between "ReactOS not having
> > Win32" and "ReactOS not needing Win32"
>
> Maybe I did not explain it correctly before. I said we could turn the
> low-level Win32 DLLs into native DLLs so that subsystem programmers had
> the *option* of using their services and thus make it easier to
> implement new subsystems. I never said that every subsystem should use
> these DLLs. They are optional because you can always reimplement the
> functionality in kernel32, user32, etc. in your own subsystem libraries
> and thus not need these modules.
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
> Now that’s a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
> _______________________________________________
> reactos-kernel mailing list
> rea...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/reactos-kernel