RE: [ros-kernel] Some thoughts on the source tree and build system

[Robert C. <rob...@it...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Kohl [mailto:ek...@rz...]=20
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 4:24 AM

> >   - no separation of Win32 and native applications, libraries and
> services.
> > And they cannot be moved because of, again, CVS limitations=20
> (AFAIK).=20
> > What was the name of that other, better version system again?
>=20
> Agreed! I guess you mean 'arch'. Since you are complaining=20
> about CVS, would you volunteer as an arch-tester and try to=20
> find out whether it suits our needs?

Arch is quite neat... however here are some hints :}.

1) Use Jonathan Geislers parch, not larch. parch is perl based and for
win32 based systems will be... so much faster... it's not funny.
2) I'm working on a C++ port of arch, but that's still some distance
from being usable. When that's usable theres another volunteer who will
be making a WIN32 native port of arch.=20

Rob