[ros-kernel] RE: Re: mingw was RE: windres help

[Steven E. <Ste...@kn...>]

When I submited a bug report it took about a month and a half to get it
addressed. At this rate getting mingw updated would take a long time. Eric
had suggested submitting everything back to mingw.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Susi
To: ros...@re...
Sent: 11/10/01 7:01 PM
Subject: [ros-kernel] Re: mingw was RE: windres help

Yes... there now seems to be 3 sets of win32 api headers: mingw's, ours,

and wine's.  It would be nice to get them all consolidated into one set 
that is up to date.  I'm still trying to get this open source spy++
clone 
to compile in mingw, but mingw's headers are missing a lot of things
that 
I'm slowing adding, but then what should I do?  Submit a patch to the
mingw 
win32api maintainers?  Patch our headers?  Both?

At 06:35 PM 11/10/2001 -0500, you wrote:

>This brings back a old question I was going to ask going to ask you
guys a 
>while back. Its a major clusterfuck when it comes to headers and
exports 
>form the def/spec files with wine/reactos/mingw. I've submitted a few
bug 
>reports to mingw where some stuff was out of date but I dont want to
waste 
>my time if someone has a better idea.
>
>What needs to be added/fixed with wine/reactos/mingw to make things a 
>little cleaner? This has been discussed before but now that the wine
DLLs 
>can be built on mingw its makes it even a more mess. I'll play janitor 
>where I can if it needs to be done.
>
>Steven
>
>
> > Shouldn't IDC_STATIC be defined in defines.h or somewhere?
>
> >I found out that IDC_STATIC is defined in winres.h which is not part
of
> >mingw yet.

====================================================
= To remove yourself from this mailing list, go to =
= http://www.reactos.com/home/mailing.html         =
====================================================
###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/