|
From: KJK::Hyperion <no...@li...> - 2001-10-16 16:44:22
|
At 12.27 15/10/2001 +0200, you wrote: >Btw, I guess the M$ developers still have to use VC 1.52 (16 bit) to build >the WinXP boot code. ;) Yes, but they're pushing Intel to drop 16 bit support eventually. Have you seen Windows 2000? it doesn't identify partitions by ordinal, but by GUID: it's a preview of what we'll see with the Itanium architecture, and with Microsoft's Windows XP 64bit (on the current architecture, however, it's just a royal pain in the a**: even resizing a partition makes Win2k beleive it's been deleted, thus changing its GUID and reassigning its mount points). All the partitioning scheme will be cleaned up from ugly inheritances as the Extended partition and 16-bit code in boot-loaders Anyway, I'm pretty sure they continued to update their 16 bit compilers, internally. For example, I recall reading in Matt Pietrek's Windows 95 System Programming about Win95's kernel having been compiled with something like a compiler generating 16bit executables with 32bit addressing... ==================================================== = To remove yourself from this mailing list, go to = = http://www.reactos.com/home/mailing.html = ==================================================== |