|
From: Phillip S. <ps...@cf...> - 2001-10-13 17:22:54
|
If there is a reason to break binary compatibility, then sure, I'm all for it, but if the NT way is good enough, we might as well be compatible with it not so that both OSes can share the same working hives, but so one can create and manipulate hives for the other to use. For instance, it might be nice to have a ReactOS boot disk that could be used to repair registry hives on an NT system. Of course, this is not of primary importance, so if there is a way to improve on the file layout that breaks compatibility, then so be it. At 03:43 PM 10/12/2001 -0700, you wrote: >At 02:43 PM 10/12/01 -0400, you wrote: >>Is it just in memory, or does it save them to an on disk hive? And if >>so, is this hive binary compatible with NT? > >It should not be binary compatible with NT hives. I cannot think of a >situation where >the same hive files could be used in two different OS installations, and >making >it binary compatible just for the sake of compatibility may mean sacrificing >performance or reliability. I think we sometimes lose focus of our primary >mission >and get carried away with making an exact copy of NT. Lets make it better and >not just a copy. > > >Rex Jolliff >re...@lv... ==================================================== = To remove yourself from this mailing list, go to = = http://www.reactos.com/home/mailing.html = ==================================================== |