|
From: Robert C. <rob...@it...> - 2001-10-08 12:35:30
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Casper Hornstrup" <ch...@us...> > > how would extra applications bloat the kernel? > > Have you ever looked at a Windows NT distribution? They are all quite large. > Not because the core Windows NT OS is large, but because there are many > extensions to the OS. Extensions like drivers and other software. Also, the > extensions included in a distribution are specific to certain targetted > end-users. Agreed. > > although, i do agree with the fact that a user should be able to customize > > his system. a package system (a la rpm/deb) might be in line later down the > > road. > > There is no need to design a new package system. Newer Windows systems has MS > Installer, which is sufficient. I beg to differ on the need for a packaging system - the Installer service, although a wonderful thing - is immature in some respects to the capability of the tools that drive installation of deb and rpm packages. Some relevant points are: * open source creation and editing tools for the file format. (Yes these can be created if someone wants to reverse engineer ORCA.) * inter-package dependencies. A msi package can _only_ install shortcuts for components it is installing. Thus to make use of this every install will include _every_ dependent package. Compare with apt, which can automatically retrieve a compatible dependency and install it automatically. However, that said, I don't believe that the reactos development should cover packaging systems at all - this is something best left to those who are distributing the OS. If the original development ends up doing that, then it is of course appropriate. Rob ==================================================== = To remove yourself from this mailing list, go to = = http://www.reactos.com/home/mailing.html = ==================================================== |