|
From: Phillip S. <ps...@cf...> - 2001-09-30 14:51:46
|
I'm not sure, but I think that sometimes the directory data is cached, such as when opening files or changing directories, it does not seem to read the disk, but when doing a simple dir command, there is intense disk IO and each file in the directory is printed one at a time, very slowly, as if it were still reading in a sector from the disk for each file found in the directory. At 11:52 AM 9/30/2001 +0100, you wrote: >On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:54:15PM -0700, Rex Jolliff wrote: > > > > I thought I was done with this. Perhaps I missed something, or subsequent > > changes > > altered the behaviour of the caching code. I am not currently working on > > this. I seem > > to remember that someone else picked up the vfat driver. Perhaps this > > person will > > look into this. If not, I can take a look. > > >The vfat directory read code uses the interfaces for reading file data so >it does go through the cache but it doesn't operate directly on the cached >data so it is less efficent. ==================================================== = To remove yourself from this mailing list, go to = = http://www.reactos.com/home/mailing.html = ==================================================== |