|
From: Shawn M. <smc...@ei...> - 2003-02-27 12:30:00
|
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:32:11PM -0800, Bill Sobel said: >=20 > Some people expect Razor to block 'spam' using a reasonable definition > of what spam is (which, btw, the EFF newsletter would NOT fall under), I think you'll find a rather large number of people who accept the definition "unsolicited email sent via an opt-out, unconfirmed list to people with whom the sender does not have an existing relationship" as being a completely reasonable one. You seem to be defining "reasonable" as "anything I agree with". The fact that the sender has good intentions doesn't figure into whether or not something is spam; it only figures into the punishment. --=20 Shawn McMahon | Imagine people who are just subscribing coming=20 Episode IV Consulting | onto this thread and deciding that the entire=20 System Administrator | OpenBSD community is full of hostile elitists. and all-around nice guy | - David Riley |