|
From: Graham M. <gr...@gm...> - 2003-02-27 09:10:32
|
"Paul Oehler" <po...@ne...> writes: > As far as I can tell, there is no perfect answer. The Spam problem is a very hard one. All Spam identification systems have > problems, and some legitimate mail will be always be marked as spam. That is why I like the Spamassassin method of only > tagging messages as likely-to-be-spam, which can later be reviewed by the recipient. In what way is the Razor method any different? Like Spamassassin (which I also use and which uses Razor2 as one of the indications of spam) it just marks spam which the user can review. |