Re: [Rapidqnet-develop] New GUI?

[Taj M. <tm...@li...>]

Hi Brian,

> Yes, I'm still trying to figure that out. I haven't found a good solution,
>
>but I do think that having all the backends in the compiler is good so the
>user can download one compiler (with only one runtime).
>
>What we could try to cobble up byte code with the RapidQ DLL. But still, I
>can't see exactly how that would work.
>
Me neither. We could write the backends in another language (eg, C++, 
C#,  Pascal, or KoolB) and then call them in RQ.NET--although this would 
be hard and be a pain.

Need to go,
Taj

-- 
"My software never has bugs, it just develops random features."