Re: [Rapideuphoria-develop] Calling functions, warning or error? -- Please vote again

[Jeremy C. <je...@co...>]

Lewis, Matthew W. wrote:
> 
> I guess that my way of thinking is that the qualification happens when
> it's used, not when it's included.  This warning implies that putting a
> namespace makes everything in there qualified, even though we could
> still access it's globals/exports without using a qualifier (unless it
> has the same name as a built in).
> 
> I think it's a reasonable warning.  Warnings are things that you need to
> consider, but that aren't necessarily incorrect.  It's easy to turn them
> off once you release.  I don't understand all the angst about warnings
> (though I admit some of them aren't as interesting as others).
> 

Ok... The good thing about just a warning is it's the easiest to
implement! :-D

Jeremy