quickfix-users — QuickFIX user support

Re: [Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Can you give some more information.  Were you sending or receiving=20
messages, or both.  Did the messages contain repeating groups?

--oren

Kimpton, C (Chris) wrote:

>QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/=
index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>Hi,
>
>I am getting occasional errors too - when using quickfix 1.11.0 on XP,
>with java 1.4.2_08.  There was not a lot of session reconnecting - just
>lots of messages.  I did have 2 separate FIX connections going though.
>
>Thanks for any thoughts,
>Chris
>
>
>An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.=

>Unexpected Signal : EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) occurred at
>PC=3D0x7C910F2B
>Function=3Dwcsncpy+0x49C
>Library=3DC:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>
>Current Java thread:
>	at quickfix.Message.destroy(Native Method)
>	at quickfix.Message.finalize(Unknown Source)
>	at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.invokeFinalizeMethod(Native Method)
>	at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:83)
>	at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:14)
>	at
>java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:160)
>
>Dynamic libraries:
>0x00400000 - 0x0040B000 	C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\bin\java.exe
>0x7C900000 - 0x7C9B0000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>0x7C800000 - 0x7C8F4000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll
>0x77DD0000 - 0x77E6B000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.dll
>0x77E70000 - 0x77F01000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll
>0x77C10000 - 0x77C68000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSVCRT.dll
>0x08000000 - 0x08138000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\client\jvm.dll
>0x77D40000 - 0x77DD0000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\USER32.dll
>0x77F10000 - 0x77F57000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\GDI32.dll
>0x76B40000 - 0x76B6D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINMM.dll
>0x6BD00000 - 0x6BD0D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\SYNCOR11.DLL
>0x10000000 - 0x10007000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\hpi.dll
>0x00390000 - 0x0039E000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\verify.dll
>0x003B0000 - 0x003C9000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\java.dll
>0x003D0000 - 0x003DE000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\zip.dll
>0x02B70000 - 0x02B8C000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\jdwp.dll
>0x00970000 - 0x00975000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\dt_socket.dll
>0x71AB0000 - 0x71AC7000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll
>0x71AA0000 - 0x71AA8000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WS2HELP.dll
>0x55600000 - 0x5561D000 	C:\Program Files\Microsoft Firewall
>Client\wspwsp.dll
>0x76D60000 - 0x76D79000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\iphlpapi.dll
>0x71A50000 - 0x71A8F000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
>0x662B0000 - 0x66308000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\hnetcfg.dll
>0x71A90000 - 0x71A98000 	C:\WINDOWS\System32\wshtcpip.dll
>0x073A0000 - 0x07447000
>T:\arbtrader\ArbTraderServer\bin\quickfix_jni.dll
>0x774E0000 - 0x7761D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ole32.dll
>0x77120000 - 0x771AC000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\OLEAUT32.dll
>0x76080000 - 0x760E5000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSVCP60.dll
>0x07450000 - 0x0745F000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\net.dll
>0x76F20000 - 0x76F47000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\DNSAPI.dll
>0x76FB0000 - 0x76FB8000 	C:\WINDOWS\System32\winrnr.dll
>0x76F60000 - 0x76F8C000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WLDAP32.dll
>0x76FC0000 - 0x76FC6000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\rasadhlp.dll
>0x76FD0000 - 0x7704F000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\CLBCATQ.DLL
>0x77050000 - 0x77115000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\COMRes.dll
>0x77C00000 - 0x77C08000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\VERSION.dll
>0x77F60000 - 0x77FD6000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\SHLWAPI.dll
>0x4D4F0000 - 0x4D548000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINHTTP.dll
>0x079C0000 - 0x079C5000
>C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\rmi.dll
>0x76C90000 - 0x76CB8000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\imagehlp.dll
>0x59A60000 - 0x59B01000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\DBGHELP.dll
>0x76BF0000 - 0x76BFB000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\PSAPI.DLL
>
>Heap at VM Abort:
>Heap
> def new generation   total 576K, used 196K [0x10010000, 0x100b0000,
>0x104f0000)
>  eden space 512K,  36% used [0x10010000, 0x1003f040, 0x10090000)
>  from space 64K,  13% used [0x10090000, 0x10092320, 0x100a0000)
>  to   space 64K,   0% used [0x100a0000, 0x100a0000, 0x100b0000)
> tenured generation   total 4400K, used 2616K [0x104f0000, 0x1093c000,
>0x14010000)
>   the space 4400K,  59% used [0x104f0000, 0x1077e178, 0x1077e200,
>0x1093c000)
> compacting perm gen  total 11520K, used 11287K [0x14010000, 0x14b50000,=

>0x18010000)
>   the space 11520K,  97% used [0x14010000, 0x14b15ff8, 0x14b16000,
>0x14b50000)
>
>Local Time =3D Tue Feb 14 13:08:14 2006
>Elapsed Time =3D 3079
>#
># The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
>#
># Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_08-b03 mixed mode)
>#
># An error report file has been saved as hs_err_pid4048.log.
># Please refer to the file for further information.
>#
><20060214-13:08:13,=20
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: qui...@li...
>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Oren
>Miller
>Sent: 26 January 2006 16:50
>To: lar...@su...
>Cc: qui...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation
>
>This may be a bug in the JVM or JDK actually. With some of the 1.5
>JVM's, it has been reported that exception violations occur, while in
>others it does not. Can you try a different JVM and JDK?
>
>--oren
>
>lar...@su... wrote:
>
> =20
>
>>Hello, I been running some test with multiple sessions for the=20
>>Quickfix jni. Or rather been trying to but I get an error while=20
>>running it. There seems to be some small bugs left in the=20
>>quickfix_jni.dll yet. Anyone knows what's the course?
>>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual
>>   =20
>>
>Machine:
> =20
>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=3D0x10002e89,=20
>>pid=3D390
>>
>>d=3D2044
>>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_06-b05 mixed mode,
>>   =20
>>
>
> =20
>
>>shar
>>
>>[java] # Problematic frame:
>>
>>[java] # C [quickfix_jni.dll+0x2e89]
>>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] # An error report file with more information is saved as
>>hs_err_pid3
>>
>>og
>>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>>
>>[java] # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
>>
>>[java] #
>>
>>[java] Java Result: 1
>>
>>[echo] second task end
>>
>>Lars
>>
>>   =20
>>
>
>_____________________________________________________________
>
>This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pr=
ivileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of =
the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, pl=
ease advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosin=
g, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents=
 of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reaso=
nable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cann=
ot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses =
in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of=
 this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of=
 the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that i=
nformation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains a=
n offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat.
>_____________________________________________________________
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log f=
iles
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Quickfix-users mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>
> =20
>

RE: [Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation

[Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...>]

Hi,

I am getting occasional errors too - when using quickfix 1.11.0 on XP,
with java 1.4.2_08.  There was not a lot of session reconnecting - just
lots of messages.  I did have 2 separate FIX connections going though.

Thanks for any thoughts,
Chris


An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) occurred at
PC=3D0x7C910F2B
Function=3Dwcsncpy+0x49C
Library=3DC:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll

Current Java thread:
=09at quickfix.Message.destroy(Native Method)
=09at quickfix.Message.finalize(Unknown Source)
=09at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.invokeFinalizeMethod(Native Method)
=09at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.runFinalizer(Finalizer.java:83)
=09at java.lang.ref.Finalizer.access$100(Finalizer.java:14)
=09at
java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:160)

Dynamic libraries:
0x00400000 - 0x0040B000 	C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\bin\java.exe
0x7C900000 - 0x7C9B0000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
0x7C800000 - 0x7C8F4000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll
0x77DD0000 - 0x77E6B000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.dll
0x77E70000 - 0x77F01000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll
0x77C10000 - 0x77C68000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSVCRT.dll
0x08000000 - 0x08138000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\client\jvm.dll
0x77D40000 - 0x77DD0000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\USER32.dll
0x77F10000 - 0x77F57000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\GDI32.dll
0x76B40000 - 0x76B6D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINMM.dll
0x6BD00000 - 0x6BD0D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\SYNCOR11.DLL
0x10000000 - 0x10007000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\hpi.dll
0x00390000 - 0x0039E000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\verify.dll
0x003B0000 - 0x003C9000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\java.dll
0x003D0000 - 0x003DE000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\zip.dll
0x02B70000 - 0x02B8C000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\jdwp.dll
0x00970000 - 0x00975000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\dt_socket.dll
0x71AB0000 - 0x71AC7000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll
0x71AA0000 - 0x71AA8000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WS2HELP.dll
0x55600000 - 0x5561D000 	C:\Program Files\Microsoft Firewall
Client\wspwsp.dll
0x76D60000 - 0x76D79000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\iphlpapi.dll
0x71A50000 - 0x71A8F000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
0x662B0000 - 0x66308000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\hnetcfg.dll
0x71A90000 - 0x71A98000 	C:\WINDOWS\System32\wshtcpip.dll
0x073A0000 - 0x07447000
T:\arbtrader\ArbTraderServer\bin\quickfix_jni.dll
0x774E0000 - 0x7761D000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\ole32.dll
0x77120000 - 0x771AC000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\OLEAUT32.dll
0x76080000 - 0x760E5000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSVCP60.dll
0x07450000 - 0x0745F000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\net.dll
0x76F20000 - 0x76F47000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\DNSAPI.dll
0x76FB0000 - 0x76FB8000 	C:\WINDOWS\System32\winrnr.dll
0x76F60000 - 0x76F8C000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WLDAP32.dll
0x76FC0000 - 0x76FC6000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\rasadhlp.dll
0x76FD0000 - 0x7704F000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\CLBCATQ.DLL
0x77050000 - 0x77115000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\COMRes.dll
0x77C00000 - 0x77C08000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\VERSION.dll
0x77F60000 - 0x77FD6000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\SHLWAPI.dll
0x4D4F0000 - 0x4D548000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINHTTP.dll
0x079C0000 - 0x079C5000
C:\installed\j2sdk1.4.2_08\jre\bin\rmi.dll
0x76C90000 - 0x76CB8000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\imagehlp.dll
0x59A60000 - 0x59B01000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\DBGHELP.dll
0x76BF0000 - 0x76BFB000 	C:\WINDOWS\system32\PSAPI.DLL

Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
=20def new generation   total 576K, used 196K [0x10010000, 0x100b0000,
0x104f0000)
=20 eden space 512K,  36% used [0x10010000, 0x1003f040, 0x10090000)
=20 from space 64K,  13% used [0x10090000, 0x10092320, 0x100a0000)
=20 to   space 64K,   0% used [0x100a0000, 0x100a0000, 0x100b0000)
=20tenured generation   total 4400K, used 2616K [0x104f0000, 0x1093c000,
0x14010000)
=20  the space 4400K,  59% used [0x104f0000, 0x1077e178, 0x1077e200,
0x1093c000)
=20compacting perm gen  total 11520K, used 11287K [0x14010000, 0x14b50000=
,
0x18010000)
=20  the space 11520K,  97% used [0x14010000, 0x14b15ff8, 0x14b16000,
0x14b50000)

Local Time =3D Tue Feb 14 13:08:14 2006
Elapsed Time =3D 3079
#
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
#
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_08-b03 mixed mode)
#
# An error report file has been saved as hs_err_pid4048.log.
# Please refer to the file for further information.
#
<20060214-13:08:13,=20


-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Oren
Miller
Sent: 26 January 2006 16:50
To: lar...@su...
Cc: qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation

This may be a bug in the JVM or JDK actually. With some of the 1.5
JVM's, it has been reported that exception violations occur, while in
others it does not. Can you try a different JVM and JDK?

--oren

lar...@su... wrote:

> Hello, I been running some test with multiple sessions for the=20
> Quickfix jni. Or rather been trying to but I get an error while=20
> running it. There seems to be some small bugs left in the=20
> quickfix_jni.dll yet. Anyone knows what's the course?
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual
Machine:
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=3D0x10002e89,=20
> pid=3D390
>
> d=3D2044
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_06-b05 mixed mode,

> shar
>
> [java] # Problematic frame:
>
> [java] # C [quickfix_jni.dll+0x2e89]
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # An error report file with more information is saved as
> hs_err_pid3
>
> og
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>
> [java] # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] Java Result: 1
>
> [echo] second task end
>
> Lars
>

_____________________________________________________________

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri=
vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t=
he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple=
ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing=
, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents =
of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason=
able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno=
t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i=
n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of =
this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of =
the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in=
formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an=
=20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat.
_____________________________________________________________

RE: [Quickfix-users] How to reset sequence numbers from java/pro

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

> I need to reset the sequence numbers programmatically and=20
> I see a set sequence number method on a session.  Any tips=20
> for accessing the session - I guess its via the=20
> initiator.getSessions ?

Hi Chris,

That's one way. There is also a Session.lookupSession(SessionID)=20
static method.

> Is there a difference between the Threaded and non Threaded=20
> versions of acceptor/initiator?=20

Yes, the "threaded" version creates a message processing
thread per session. The other version uses a single thread
for all sessions.
=20
> I've added a quick javadoc builder to the src/build.xml - if=20
> anyone is interested.=20

There's also a javadoc target in the QuickFIX/J build file. As
a side note, most of the public classes and methods in QFJ have=20
additional Javadoc comments as compared to the JNI code although
many of the comments apply to both implementations.

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/

[Quickfix-users] How to reset sequence numbers from java/pro

[Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...>]

Hi,

I need to reset the sequence numbers programmatically and I see a set
sequence number method on a session.  Any tips for accessing the session
- I guess its via the initiator.getSessions ?


Is there a difference between the Threaded and non Threaded versions of
acceptor/initiator?

I've added a quick javadoc builder to the src/build.xml - if anyone is
interested.

=20   <target name=3D"javadoc">
=20       <javadoc sourcepath=3D"java/src" destdir=3D"javadoc"
packagenames=3D"*" maxmemory=3D"512m">
=20          =20
=20       </javadoc>
=20   </target>

Thanks in advance,

> ____________________________________________
Chris Kimpton


_____________________________________________________________

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri=
vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t=
he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple=
ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing=
, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents =
of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason=
able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno=
t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i=
n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of =
this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of =
the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in=
formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an=
=20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat.
_____________________________________________________________

[Quickfix-users] Re: Problem running QuickFix 1.9.3 managed wrapper (System.IO.FileNotFoundException) in VB/.NET

[John H. <jo...@al...>]

Paul Petraitis <paulp@...> writes:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, It seems I have same issue as posting 2004-11-18 10:20, except my
application is in VB/.NET
>  When I try to run the application I get the following exception. An unhandled
exception of type "System.IO.FileNotFoundException" occurred in UnknownModule.
>  Additional information: File or assembly name quickfix_net, or one of its
dependencies, wasnot found.
>  
> 

Paul,

By any chance did you ever resolve this?  I'm trying to get a small sample app
running here and have hit the exact same error message.  QuickFix, VS2005, VB,
etc.

Many thanks,

    John Haldi
    (jo...@al...)

[Quickfix-users] Required tag missing error

[<lar...@su...>]

Hi, when I'm using quickfix with the java wrapper(native) and more then
on session I get two kinds of error. One is that the engine crash and
the other is that it says that a required field is missing when it's the
same message that was sent just a second ago and the log files show that
the incoming message x and x+1 is the same (with different timestamps
and message sequence number)=20

=20

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D12435=3DD34=3D3449=3DBenchmark_Acceptor_152=3D20060207-10:=
38:2056=3DBen
chmark_Initiator_111=3DClOrderId21=3D138=3D100040=3D154=3D155=3DIBM10=3D1=
77

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D12435=3DD34=3D3549=3DBenchmark_Acceptor_152=3D20060207-10:=
38:2056=3DBen
chmark_Initiator_111=3DClOrderId21=3D138=3D100040=3D154=3D155=3DIBM10=3D1=
78

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D12435=3DD34=3D3649=3DBenchmark_Acceptor_152=3D20060207-10:=
38:2056=3DBen
chmark_Initiator_111=3DClOrderId21=3D138=3D100040=3D154=3D155=3DIBM10=3D1=
79

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D12435=3DD34=3D3749=3DBenchmark_Acceptor_152=3D20060207-10:=
38:2056=3DBen
chmark_Initiator_111=3DClOrderId21=3D138=3D100040=3D154=3D155=3DIBM10=3D1=
80

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D12435=3DD34=3D3849=3DBenchmark_Acceptor_152=3D20060207-10:=
38:2056=3DBen
chmark_Initiator_111=3DClOrderId21=3D138=3D100040=3D154=3D155=3DIBM10=3D1=
81

=20

=20

8=3DFIX.4.09=3D11135=3D334=3D8649=3DBenchmark_Initiator_152=3D20060207-10=
:38:2056=3DBe
nchmark_Acceptor_145=3D3658=3DRequired tag missing10=3D182

=20

Lars

Re: [Quickfix-users] Heartbeats - can we see them?

[Dale W. <wil...@oc...>]

Hi Chris,

Kimpton, C (Chris) wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using quickfix 1.11.0 via the Java interface.
>
> Is it possible to get callbacks about the heartbeat messages?  We have 
> some internal heartbeats that I want to link with the FIX ones.
>
You can see the heartbeat messages in the toAdmin (outgoing) and 
fromAdmin (incoming) callback.  Pick up MsgType out of the header and 
compare to heartbeat. If you modify the message in toAdmin at one end, 
you should see the modifications in fromAdmin at the other.

HTH,


Dale

> Thanks,
>
> *____________________________________________*
> Chris Kimpton
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally 
> privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal 
> attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this 
> email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are 
> notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
> in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
> prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no 
> viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for 
> any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or 
> attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, 
> or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the 
> information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that 
> information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email 
> contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. /
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
  Dale Wilson, Senior Software Engineer
  Object Computing, Inc. (OCI)
  http://www.ociweb.com/  http://www.theaceorb.com/
----------------------------------------------------

[Quickfix-users] Heartbeats - can we see them?

[Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...>]

Hi,

I am using quickfix 1.11.0 via the Java interface.

Is it possible to get callbacks about the heartbeat messages?  We have
some internal heartbeats that I want to link with the FIX ones.

Thanks,

> ____________________________________________
Chris Kimpton


_____________________________________________________________

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri=
vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t=
he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple=
ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing=
, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents =
of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason=
able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno=
t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i=
n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of =
this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of =
the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in=
formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an=
=20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat.
_____________________________________________________________

[Quickfix-users] MFC and QuickFix

[Sam C. <sa...@ho...>]

Hello all,

Can someone please point me to some information on how to use QuickFix with MFC?
I did not find anything in the documentation. I am looking for info on how to
integrate QF into a UI and what project settings I might need to use. I am using
VC++ 6.0.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Sam

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.11.0 is now available

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

ON QUICKFIX
-----------------
QuickFIX 1.11.0 is now available at http://www.quickfixengine.org

You can get the release notes for all versions here: 
http://www.quickfixengine.org/NEWS

We did a lot of work to make it easier to build the project.  For 
windows users, everything is now under one solution file.  This includes 
the C++, .NET, jni, and example programs.  So it should be much more 
obvious to new users what is available.  The documentation has also been 
slightly restructured into categories which I hope will make it easier 
to find things.  Feedback is appreciated.

Ok, so first of all the project has been updated to be compatible with 
the latest compilers.  This means gcc 4.x and Visual Studio 8/2005/.NET 
2.0.  I know many of you have begun to use these, so you will no longer 
have to use hacked up versions of the source.  JNI should also work on 
64 bit systems.

The FileLog is no longer separated into .incoming and .outgoing files.  
It all goes into one .messages file.  This is so the exact message 
sequence that occured in a session can be accurately reconstructed.  
This should make it a lot easier to figure out exactly what happened 
when analyzing the logs.  Likewise, the databases will place all 
messages into a single table where they can share a auto-incrementing id.

There is native support for a couple of databases.  PostgreSQL and MSSQL 
(windows only currently).  And MySQL and PostgreSQL store and log 
implementation now support connection pools.

The sequence reset functionality should be useable now.  The previous 
version had problems, which I believe have all been resolved in this 
release.  Please continue to give feedback.

Much more, so read the release notes for a full account.

ON QUICKFIX/J
-------------------
You will notice on the download page that QuickFIX/J, clearly marked 
with a bright red *beta* disclaimer is available.  We will begin placing 
the latest QuickFIX/J beta releases here (which will turn into real 
releases at some point).  We are putting these here to make them easier 
to find so we can expand the beta user base and get more feedback.  The 
QuickFIX/J documentation is available online as well.  Remember to 
report anything you find in the bugtracker: 
http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker.  Steve Bate is leading the 
development of this port, so he is the guy to contact if you want to 
become involved.

ON OTHER STUFF
---------------------
There are several companies that provide services surrounding QuickFIX 
which range from training to support to project work.  If you are in 
need of any of these check out this page for information about these 
companies:  http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html

Does your company provide any such services?  Send me information and 
we'll add you to the site if appropriate.

Re: [Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

This may be a bug in the JVM or JDK actually. With some of the 1.5 
JVM's, it has been reported that exception violations occur, while in 
others it does not. Can you try a different JVM and JDK?

--oren

lar...@su... wrote:

> Hello, I been running some test with multiple sessions for the 
> Quickfix jni. Or rather been trying to but I get an error while 
> running it. There seems to be some small bugs left in the 
> quickfix_jni.dll yet. Anyone knows what’s the course?
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine:
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x10002e89, pid=390
>
> d=2044
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_06-b05 mixed mode, 
> shar
>
> [java] # Problematic frame:
>
> [java] # C [quickfix_jni.dll+0x2e89]
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # An error report file with more information is saved as 
> hs_err_pid3
>
> og
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>
> [java] # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
>
> [java] #
>
> [java] Java Result: 1
>
> [echo] second task end
>
> Lars
>

[Quickfix-users] RE: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX/J HEAD has been converted to MINA

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

I forgot to mention. There are several new settings for
QFJ socket configuration in acceptors and initiators. The
acceptor options must be set in the default section of
the settings. The initiator settings can be put in the
default section or specified per-session.

See the documentation for the following options:

SocketKeepAlive
SocketOobInline
SocketReceiveBufferSize
SocketReuseAddress
SocketSendBufferSize
SocketLinger
SocketTcpNoDelay
SocketTrafficClass

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX/J HEAD has been converted to MINA

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hello all,

The default acceptors and initiators are now using MINA. For now,
I have left the Netty-based code in the repository and moved the
previous acceptors and initiators into the quickfix.netty package.
I'm planning to remove the Netty-related code before the Beta 3
release but I've left it there in case there are any serious
problems with MINA.

However, I'm not expecting problems. All acceptance and unit
tests are passing. Please use the bug tracker if you have
problems.

Thanks,

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/

RE: [Quickfix-users] Quickfix/j performance

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hello Lars,
=20
Can you send me a copy of your test program? I've done performance tests =
on
message marshalling and the protocol engine itself (the Session) and it =
was faster=20
than JNI. I'm guessing the performance difference you're seeing is the =
networking code=20
but I'd like to verify that guess.
=20
Thanks,
=20
Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/


________________________________

	From: qui...@li... =
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of =
lar...@su...
	Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:27 AM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-users] Quickfix/j performance
=09
=09

	Since I received the error from running with the JNI version of =
quickfix and java I thought it might be nice to test my program with =
quickfix/J. It was almost only to change the libraries. As someone =
mention the quikcfix/j from the initator.getSessions() returns an array =
with the Session(s) objects instead of the SessionID(s). That required a =
small change on just .getSessionID(). Then it worked almost as intended. =
When running the test over one session I get like 1000messages/second =
and with the JNI version I got like 3000messages/second.=20

	=20

	Anyone got any id=E9e why I get lower messages per second using the =
quickfix/J instead of quickfix with JNI?=20

	=20

	The test is very simple it just tries to send x new singe order =
messages as fast as possible over a single session.=20

	I'm using the Session.sendToTarget(message, SessionID); to send =
messages.=20

	=20

	Lars

[Quickfix-users] Quickfix/j performance

[<lar...@su...>]

Since I received the error from running with the JNI version of quickfix =
and java I thought it might be nice to test my program with quickfix/J. =
It was almost only to change the libraries. As someone mention the =
quikcfix/j from the initator.getSessions() returns an array with the =
Session(s) objects instead of the SessionID(s). That required a small =
change on just .getSessionID(). Then it worked almost as intended. When =
running the test over one session I get like 1000messages/second and =
with the JNI version I got like 3000messages/second.=20

=20

Anyone got any id=E9e why I get lower messages per second using the =
quickfix/J instead of quickfix with JNI?=20

=20

The test is very simple it just tries to send x new singe order messages =
as fast as possible over a single session.=20

I'm using the Session.sendToTarget(message, SessionID); to send =
messages.=20

=20

Lars

[Quickfix-users] Exectpiton violation

[<lar...@su...>]

Hello, I been running some test with multiple sessions for the Quickfix
jni. Or rather been trying to but I get an error while running it. There
seems to be some small bugs left in the quickfix_jni.dll yet.  Anyone
knows what's the course?=20

=20

=20

[java] #

[java] # An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual
Machine:

[java] #

[java] #  EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=3D0x10002e89,
pid=3D390

d=3D2044

[java] #

[java] # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_06-b05 mixed mode,
shar

=20

[java] # Problematic frame:

[java] # C  [quickfix_jni.dll+0x2e89]

[java] #

[java] # An error report file with more information is saved as
hs_err_pid3

og

[java] #

[java] # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:

[java] #   http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp

[java] #

[java] Java Result: 1

[echo] second task end

=20

Lars

Re: [Quickfix-users] Setting SenderSubID

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

order.getHeader().set( sendersubid )

--oren

Marat Molyboga wrote:

> How can I set SenderSubID (tag 50).  I tried:
>  
> NewOrderSingle order;
> SenderSubID sendersubid = new SenderSubID("SenderSubID");
> order.set(sendersubid);
>  
> but I get the following error message at compilation time. It says: 
> "The best overloaded method match for 
> "QuickFix42.NewOrderSingle.set(QuickFix.ClOrdID)' has some invalid 
> arguments"  and "Argument '1': cannot convert from 
> 'QuickFix.SenderSubID' to 'QuickFix.ClOrdID'  
>  
> Thanks,
> Marat Molyboga
>  
> NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for 
> use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally 
> privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any 
> attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this 
> email in error, please immediately notify us by replying to this 
> message. You must permanently delete the original e-mail and any 
> copies and printouts made thereof. Delivery of this e-mail and any 
> attachments to any person other than the intended  recipient(s) is not 
> intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a privilege. All 
> personal messages express views only of the sender and may not be 
> copied or distributed.

[Quickfix-users] Setting SenderSubID

[Marat M. <mol...@pe...>]

How can I set SenderSubID (tag 50).  I tried:=20
=20
NewOrderSingle order;
SenderSubID sendersubid =3D new SenderSubID("SenderSubID");
order.set(sendersubid);
=20
but I get the following error message at compilation time. It says: "The
best overloaded method match for
"QuickFix42.NewOrderSingle.set(QuickFix.ClOrdID)' has some invalid
arguments"  and "Argument '1': cannot convert from
'QuickFix.SenderSubID' to 'QuickFix.ClOrdID'=20
=20
Thanks,
Marat Molyboga
=20
NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use
by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.  If you receive this email in error, please immediately
notify us by replying to this message. You must permanently delete the
original e-mail and any copies and printouts made thereof. Delivery of
this e-mail and any attachments to any person other than the intended
recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or a
privilege. All personal messages express views only of the sender and
may not be copied or distributed.=20

RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

[<lar...@su...>]

Ok, thank you

It was something like the Sessions.lookupSession(SessionID) I was
searching for but couldn't find it in the documents. I could be wrong
but it might be interesting to add a section on supporting multiple
sessions in the documents and what commands to use when dealing with
multiple sessions, not only in the java versions but every version.=20

=20

Lars

=20

  _____ =20

From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Steve
Bate
Sent: den 20 januari 2006 16:26
To: qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

=20

Hi Lars,

=20

Yes, I didn't realize that was an extra method in QFJ. By concrete
class, I mean the method is

not defined in the Initiator interface, but only in the Initiator
implementations.

=20

QFJ is intended to be backwards compatible with the QuickFIX JNI
wrapper. The two APIs

are not identical since QFJ is a superset of QuickFIX JNI. You can more
forward by changing

a JAR file, but you may or may not be able to move backwards that way
(depending on the

QFJ features you use).=20

=20

This is why I'm concerned about QFJ returning sessions from
getSessions() while JNI is returning=20

session IDs. That breaks the backwards compatibility.

=20

To do what you want using the JNI wrapper, you can get the session IDs
from the initiator

and then get the sessions using Session.lookupSession(SessionID). You
can then check

the sessions individually for connections status.

=20

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/

	=20

=09
  _____ =20


	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
	Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 4:12 PM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

	Hmm, is that only in the Quickfix\j Version or how do I find
that function since eclipse can't seem to find that function.

	=20

	When I looked at the source files this is the code of the
initiator in the dll version of the java:

	=20

	    void start() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    void block() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    boolean poll() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    void stop();

	      void stop( boolean force );

	      boolean isLoggedOn();

	    ArrayList getSessions();

	=20

	=20

	Looking at the API for quickfix\j I see that it has both
functions=20

	 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28%29> ()=20
	          Checks the logged on status of the initiator's
sessions.=20

	 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28quickfix.SessionID%29> (SessionID
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\SessionID.html>  session)=20
	          Checks the logged on status of the specified session.

	=20

	=20

	So how do I use this if I'm not using the quickfix\J but still
have to use java? What do you mean by concrete class btw?

	=20

	=20

	 I think I read somewhere that there shouldn't be any difference
between the interface API you used for quickfix dll java version and
quickfix\J, other then you didn't have to load the DLL.=20

	=20

	Lars

	=20

=09
  _____ =20


	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Steve
Bate
	Sent: den 20 januari 2006 12:35
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

	=20

	Hello Lars,

	=20

	From looking at the JNI code it does appear that the initiators
in the JNI wrapper return an

	array of SessionIDs. QFJ returns the actual sessions. This is an
unintentional difference in

	the API.

	=20

	Oren, do you have a preference about whether to return
SessionIDs or Sessions from the

	JNI API? If we want to leave it the way it is in the JNI layer,
I'll need to modify the initiators

	(and acceptors?) in QFJ to return the same data types.=20

	=20

	The initiator concrete classes also have an
isLoggedOn(SessionID) method that is not

	present in the Initiator interface. That might be useful for
your purposes.

	=20

	Steve Bate
	Smart Trade Technologies
	Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
	http://www.smart-trade.net/

		=20

	=09
  _____ =20


		From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
		Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
		To: qui...@li...
		Subject: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

		I'm using java and both quickfix\J and the regular
native interface. I'm using multiple sessions and are looking on a way
to get info on a specific session in the java environment.=20

		=20

		In the c/c++ environment the initiator/acceptor classes
have both the function getSessions() and getSession(arguments). But the
Java versions only have the getSessions() that returns the SessionID not
the actually session. =20

		=20

		Then my problem is that if I want to know if every
session is connected I for example want to use initiator.isConnected()
to check that every connection is connected or check every connection
separately.=20

		The problem is that the isConnected() return true if any
of the connections is connected and that I havn't found a way to check
that a single connection is connected.

		=20

		Do I have to keep track of logon/logoff myself in java
but not in C/C++

		=20

		Lars

Re: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Sure, if you think it's ready.  We can put that stuff up.

--oren

On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Steve Bate wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/=20
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for responding to this question.
>
> Oren,
>
> Can we add the QuickFIX/J download links on the
> quickfixengine.org site. Should we also place the QFJ docs
> online since there are additional configuration options
> beyond those supported by the JNI wrapper?
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Bate
> Smart Trade Technologies
> Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
> http://www.smart-trade.net/
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: qui...@li...
>> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf
>> Of Michael Whealy
>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:02 PM
>> To: qui...@li...
>> Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file
>>
>> QuickFIX Documentation:
>> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>
>> Lars and John,
>>
>> You can actually download both the source and binary files of
>> QuickFIX/J
>> 1.0.0-beta2 from
>> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D37535&pa
>> ckage_id=3D1
>> 58434
>>
>> Stephen Bates sent an email on the 17th Jan about this.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: qui...@li...
>> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf
>> Of John Hensley
>> Sent: Friday, 20 January 2006 8:47 AM
>> To: qui...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file
>>
>> QuickFIX Documentation:
>> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>
>> Lars, right now you have to get QuickFIX/J from CVS. =46rom the =
command
>> line:
>>
>> $ cvs -d
>> :pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/quickfix login
>>
>> Just hit return when prompted for the password. Then check it
>> out with:
>>
>> $ cvs -d
>> :pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/quickfix co quickfixj
>>
>> Build it with:
>>
>> $ ant jar
>>
>> And you should find the result in output/ant/jars/quickfixj.jar.
>>
>> John
>>
>> lar...@su... wrote:
>>> I'm using the java native interface but I would like to use the
>>> Quickfix\j engine but haven't found a download link or any
>>> documentation of it other then it exists.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep
>> through log files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX
>> search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as
>> surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&
>> dat=3D121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfix-users mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>>
>>
>> NOTICE
>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may
>> contain copyright material of Macquarie Bank or third
>> parties. If you are not the intended recipient of this email
>> you should not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in
>> reliance on this e-mail or any attachments, and should
>> destroy all copies of them. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee
>> the integrity of any emails or any attached files. The views
>> or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not
>> reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie Bank.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep
>> through log files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX
>> search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as
>> surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfix-users mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through =20
> log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD =20
> SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642=

> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>

RE: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Michael,

Thanks for responding to this question.

Oren,=20

Can we add the QuickFIX/J download links on the
quickfixengine.org site. Should we also place the QFJ docs
online since there are additional configuration options
beyond those supported by the JNI wrapper?

Regards,

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: qui...@li...=20
> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Michael Whealy
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:02 PM
> To: qui...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file
>=20
> QuickFIX Documentation:=20
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>=20
> Lars and John,
>=20
> You can actually download both the source and binary files of=20
> QuickFIX/J
> 1.0.0-beta2 from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D37535&pa
> ckage_id=3D1
> 58434
>=20
> Stephen Bates sent an email on the 17th Jan about this.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Michael.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: qui...@li...
> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of John Hensley
> Sent: Friday, 20 January 2006 8:47 AM
> To: qui...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file
>=20
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>=20
> Lars, right now you have to get QuickFIX/J from CVS. From the command
> line:
>=20
> $ cvs -d=20
> :pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/quickfix login
>=20
> Just hit return when prompted for the password. Then check it=20
> out with:
>=20
> $ cvs -d=20
> :pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/quickfix co quickfixj
>=20
> Build it with:
>=20
> $ ant jar
>=20
> And you should find the result in output/ant/jars/quickfixj.jar.
>=20
> John
>=20
> lar...@su... wrote:
> > I'm using the java native interface but I would like to use the=20
> > Quickfix\j engine but haven't found a download link or any=20
> > documentation of it other then it exists.
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep=20
> through log files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX=20
> search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as=20
> surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&
> dat=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>=20
>=20
> NOTICE
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may=20
> contain copyright material of Macquarie Bank or third=20
> parties. If you are not the intended recipient of this email=20
> you should not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in=20
> reliance on this e-mail or any attachments, and should=20
> destroy all copies of them. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee=20
> the integrity of any emails or any attached files. The views=20
> or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not=20
> reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie Bank.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep=20
> through log files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX=20
> search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as=20
> surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>=20

Re: [Quickfix-users] Could not open messages file

[Dale W. <wil...@oc...>]

Hi Lars,

To add to what Steve said (at the risk of stating the obvious)  Even 
though QuickFIX acceptor can listen on only one port, it can support 
many sessions.  You just need to configure all the initiators to connect 
to the same port on the acceptor.  The details get sorted out during the 
login process.

Dale


Steve Bate wrote:

>QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>Hello Lars,
>
>The acceptor port must be specified in the default section
>of the configuration file. Therefore there can only be one
>port defined for an acceptor. This is the same for the C++
>and QF/J implementations.
>
>http://quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/configuration.html
>
>Steve Bate
>Smart Trade Technologies
>Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
>http://www.smart-trade.net/
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Thank you for the information about where to download 
>>quickfix/J, and for pointing out that the log-file-path was 
>>incorrect. Now instead I have a different question. 
>>
>>Can you different ports for the acceptor running the same 
>>"engine". For example session 1 uses port 7000 and session 2 
>>uses port 7001. I know I can connect to different ports if I 
>>use an Initiator but I don't seem to be able to create an 
>>Acceptor with different ports. 
>>
>>Lars
>>    
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
>_______________________________________________
>Quickfix-users mailing list
>Qui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>  
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
  Dale Wilson, Senior Software Engineer
  Object Computing, Inc. (OCI)
  http://www.ociweb.com/  http://www.theaceorb.com/
----------------------------------------------------

RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hi Lars,
=20
Yes, I didn't realize that was an extra method in QFJ. By concrete
class, I mean the method is
not defined in the Initiator interface, but only in the Initiator
implementations.
=20
QFJ is intended to be backwards compatible with the QuickFIX JNI
wrapper. The two APIs
are not identical since QFJ is a superset of QuickFIX JNI. You can more
forward by changing
a JAR file, but you may or may not be able to move backwards that way
(depending on the
QFJ features you use).=20
=20
This is why I'm concerned about QFJ returning sessions from
getSessions() while JNI is returning=20
session IDs. That breaks the backwards compatibility.
=20
To do what you want using the JNI wrapper, you can get the session IDs
from the initiator
and then get the sessions using Session.lookupSession(SessionID). You
can then check
the sessions individually for connections status.
=20
Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/


________________________________

	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
	Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 4:12 PM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected
=09
=09

	Hmm, is that only in the Quickfix\j Version or how do I find
that function since eclipse can't seem to find that function.

	=20

	When I looked at the source files this is the code of the
initiator in the dll version of the java:

	=20

	    void start() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    void block() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    boolean poll() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

	    void stop();

	      void stop( boolean force );

	      boolean isLoggedOn();

	    ArrayList getSessions();

	=20

	=20

	Looking at the API for quickfix\j I see that it has both
functions=20

	 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28%29> ()=20
	          Checks the logged on status of the initiator's
sessions.=20

	 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28quickfix.SessionID%29> (SessionID
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\SessionID.html>  session)=20
	          Checks the logged on status of the specified session.

	=20

	=20

	So how do I use this if I'm not using the quickfix\J but still
have to use java? What do you mean by concrete class btw?

	=20

	=20

	 I think I read somewhere that there shouldn't be any difference
between the interface API you used for quickfix dll java version and
quickfix\J, other then you didn't have to load the DLL.=20

	=20

	Lars

	=20

=09
________________________________


	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Steve
Bate
	Sent: den 20 januari 2006 12:35
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

	=20

	Hello Lars,

	=20

	From looking at the JNI code it does appear that the initiators
in the JNI wrapper return an

	array of SessionIDs. QFJ returns the actual sessions. This is an
unintentional difference in

	the API.

	=20

	Oren, do you have a preference about whether to return
SessionIDs or Sessions from the

	JNI API? If we want to leave it the way it is in the JNI layer,
I'll need to modify the initiators

	(and acceptors?) in QFJ to return the same data types.=20

	=20

	The initiator concrete classes also have an
isLoggedOn(SessionID) method that is not

	present in the Initiator interface. That might be useful for
your purposes.

	=20

	Steve Bate
	Smart Trade Technologies
	Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
	http://www.smart-trade.net/

		=20

	=09
________________________________


		From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
		Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
		To: qui...@li...
		Subject: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

		I'm using java and both quickfix\J and the regular
native interface. I'm using multiple sessions and are looking on a way
to get info on a specific session in the java environment.=20

		=20

		In the c/c++ environment the initiator/acceptor classes
have both the function getSessions() and getSession(arguments). But the
Java versions only have the getSessions() that returns the SessionID not
the actually session. =20

		=20

		Then my problem is that if I want to know if every
session is connected I for example want to use initiator.isConnected()
to check that every connection is connected or check every connection
separately.=20

		The problem is that the isConnected() return true if any
of the connections is connected and that I havn't found a way to check
that a single connection is connected.

		=20

		Do I have to keep track of logon/logoff myself in java
but not in C/C++

		=20

		Lars

RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

[<lar...@su...>]

Hmm, is that only in the Quickfix\j Version or how do I find that
function since eclipse can't seem to find that function.

=20

When I looked at the source files this is the code of the initiator in
the dll version of the java:

=20

    void start() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

    void block() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

    boolean poll() throws ConfigError, RuntimeError;

    void stop();

      void stop( boolean force );

      boolean isLoggedOn();

    ArrayList getSessions();

=20

=20

Looking at the API for quickfix\j I see that it has both functions=20

 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28%29> ()=20
          Checks the logged on status of the initiator's sessions.=20

 boolean isLoggedOn
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\Initiator.html#isLoggedOn%28quickfix.SessionID%29> (SessionID
<file:///D:\stuff\sharestuff\quickfix-1.0.0-beta2-bin\quickfixj\doc\api\
quickfix\SessionID.html>  session)=20
          Checks the logged on status of the specified session.

=20

=20

So how do I use this if I'm not using the quickfix\J but still have to
use java? What do you mean by concrete class btw?

=20

=20

 I think I read somewhere that there shouldn't be any difference between
the interface API you used for quickfix dll java version and quickfix\J,
other then you didn't have to load the DLL.=20

=20

Lars

=20

  _____ =20

From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Steve
Bate
Sent: den 20 januari 2006 12:35
To: qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

=20

Hello Lars,

=20

From looking at the JNI code it does appear that the initiators in the
JNI wrapper return an

array of SessionIDs. QFJ returns the actual sessions. This is an
unintentional difference in

the API.

=20

Oren, do you have a preference about whether to return SessionIDs or
Sessions from the

JNI API? If we want to leave it the way it is in the JNI layer, I'll
need to modify the initiators

(and acceptors?) in QFJ to return the same data types.=20

=20

The initiator concrete classes also have an isLoggedOn(SessionID) method
that is not

present in the Initiator interface. That might be useful for your
purposes.

=20

Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/

	=20

=09
  _____ =20


	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
	Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected

	I'm using java and both quickfix\J and the regular native
interface. I'm using multiple sessions and are looking on a way to get
info on a specific session in the java environment.=20

	=20

	In the c/c++ environment the initiator/acceptor classes have
both the function getSessions() and getSession(arguments). But the Java
versions only have the getSessions() that returns the SessionID not the
actually session. =20

	=20

	Then my problem is that if I want to know if every session is
connected I for example want to use initiator.isConnected() to check
that every connection is connected or check every connection separately.


	The problem is that the isConnected() return true if any of the
connections is connected and that I havn't found a way to check that a
single connection is connected.

	=20

	Do I have to keep track of logon/logoff myself in java but not
in C/C++

	=20

	Lars

RE: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is connected

[Steve B. <sb...@sm...>]

Hello Lars,
=20
From looking at the JNI code it does appear that the initiators in the
JNI wrapper return an
array of SessionIDs. QFJ returns the actual sessions. This is an
unintentional difference in
the API.
=20
Oren, do you have a preference about whether to return SessionIDs or
Sessions from the
JNI API? If we want to leave it the way it is in the JNI layer, I'll
need to modify the initiators
(and acceptors?) in QFJ to return the same data types.=20
=20
The initiator concrete classes also have an isLoggedOn(SessionID) method
that is not
present in the Initiator interface. That might be useful for your
purposes.
=20
Steve Bate
Smart Trade Technologies
Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97
http://www.smart-trade.net/


________________________________

	From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of
lar...@su...
	Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:40 AM
	To: qui...@li...
	Subject: [Quickfix-users] Checking that all sessions is
connected
=09
=09

	I'm using java and both quickfix\J and the regular native
interface. I'm using multiple sessions and are looking on a way to get
info on a specific session in the java environment.=20

	=20

	In the c/c++ environment the initiator/acceptor classes have
both the function getSessions() and getSession(arguments). But the Java
versions only have the getSessions() that returns the SessionID not the
actually session. =20

	=20

	Then my problem is that if I want to know if every session is
connected I for example want to use initiator.isConnected() to check
that every connection is connected or check every connection separately.


	The problem is that the isConnected() return true if any of the
connections is connected and that I havn't found a way to check that a
single connection is connected.

	=20

	Do I have to keep track of logon/logoff myself in java but not
in C/C++

	=20

	Lars