You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(28) |
2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(33) |
2005 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(11) |
2006 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(54) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(11) |
2007 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(8) |
2008 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(10) |
2009 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(13) |
2010 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(17) |
2011 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(8) |
2013 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-03-02 01:38:30
|
Steve, No, startDay and endDay were both zero not -1. The SessionSchedule constructor doesn't set them because I'm not putting the StartDay and EndDay properties in SessionSettings. The constructor leaves weeklySession=false causing the assignment of startDay and endDay to be ignored. Thanks, Matthew Steve Bate wrote: > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > Hi Matt, > > First, I'm assuming the startDay and endDay are -1 (the default > if no day is set) and not 0. Is that right? > > I've committed John's patches for SessionSchedule into the CVS > HEAD. I also found another bug in the schedule which may have > been causing your problem. There were unit tests for that code > but, alas, the unit tests were wrong. ;-) I've corrected both > in the HEAD. Hopefully, these changes will solve your problem. > > Regards, > > Steve > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: qui...@li... >> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf >> Of Matthew Stone >> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:07 PM >> To: qui...@li... >> Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re: Are sequences automatically reset >> >> QuickFIX Documentation: >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >> Looking at the code it appears the sequences should be reset, however >> mine are not. Here's the problem senerio: My app shuts down before >> FixEndTime then starts up the next day after FixStartTime. When the >> quickfix.SessionSchedule checks to see if isSameSession it >> returns true >> because only the time fields are compared and not the date >> fields. It >> doesn't check the date fields because the following condition >> is false: >> >> startDay < 0 && endDay < 0 >> >> startDay and endDay are 0 for me since I'm using daily >> sessions and not >> weekly. >> >> If I left my app running outside the session time boundary everything >> seems to be ok. So, my option as a workaround seems to be reseting >> manually once a day. >> >> Matthew >> >> Matthew Stone wrote: >> >>> Does quickfix automatically reset sequences when a session >>> >> changes? >> >>> Yesterday I started up a session from FixStartTime=07:00:00 to >>> FixEndTime=19:00:00 and my app finished the day with >>> >> MsgSeqNum=190. >> >>> Today, my app tried to log on with MsgSeqNum=191. I was expecting >>> quickfix to start with a new seq. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Matthew >>> >>> qfj beta 3 >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking >> scripting language >> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend >> the live webcast >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new >> coding territory! >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720& >> dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Quickfix-users mailing list >> Qui...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > |
From: Steve B. <sb...@sm...> - 2006-03-01 21:35:36
|
Hi Matt, First, I'm assuming the startDay and endDay are -1 (the default if no day is set) and not 0. Is that right? I've committed John's patches for SessionSchedule into the CVS=20 HEAD. I also found another bug in the schedule which may have=20 been causing your problem. There were unit tests for that code but, alas, the unit tests were wrong. ;-) I've corrected both in the HEAD. Hopefully, these changes will solve your problem. Regards, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li...=20 > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Matthew Stone > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:07 PM > To: qui...@li... > Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re: Are sequences automatically reset >=20 > QuickFIX Documentation:=20 > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >=20 > Looking at the code it appears the sequences should be reset, however=20 > mine are not. Here's the problem senerio: My app shuts down before=20 > FixEndTime then starts up the next day after FixStartTime. When the=20 > quickfix.SessionSchedule checks to see if isSameSession it=20 > returns true=20 > because only the time fields are compared and not the date=20 > fields. It=20 > doesn't check the date fields because the following condition=20 > is false: >=20 > startDay < 0 && endDay < 0 >=20 > startDay and endDay are 0 for me since I'm using daily=20 > sessions and not=20 > weekly.=20 >=20 > If I left my app running outside the session time boundary everything=20 > seems to be ok. So, my option as a workaround seems to be reseting=20 > manually once a day. >=20 > Matthew >=20 > Matthew Stone wrote: > > Does quickfix automatically reset sequences when a session=20 > changes? =20 > > Yesterday I started up a session from FixStartTime=3D07:00:00 to=20 > > FixEndTime=3D19:00:00 and my app finished the day with=20 > MsgSeqNum=3D190. =20 > > Today, my app tried to log on with MsgSeqNum=3D191. I was = expecting=20 > > quickfix to start with a new seq. > > > > Thanks, > > Matthew > > > > qfj beta 3 > > >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking=20 > scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend=20 > the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new=20 > coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720& > dat=3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >=20 |
From: John H. <jhe...@bo...> - 2006-03-01 21:15:50
|
Hi Matthew, This is my bug. I've submitted a patch for it, which I'll send to you off the list. John -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Matthew Stone Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 3:07 PM To: qui...@li... Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re: Are sequences automatically reset QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Looking at the code it appears the sequences should be reset, however mine are not. Here's the problem senerio: My app shuts down before FixEndTime then starts up the next day after FixStartTime. When the quickfix.SessionSchedule checks to see if isSameSession it returns true=20 because only the time fields are compared and not the date fields. It=20 doesn't check the date fields because the following condition is false: startDay < 0 && endDay < 0 startDay and endDay are 0 for me since I'm using daily sessions and not weekly.=20 If I left my app running outside the session time boundary everything=20 seems to be ok. So, my option as a workaround seems to be reseting=20 manually once a day. Matthew Matthew Stone wrote: > Does quickfix automatically reset sequences when a session changes? =20 > Yesterday I started up a session from FixStartTime=3D07:00:00 to=20 > FixEndTime=3D19:00:00 and my app finished the day with = MsgSeqNum=3D190. > Today, my app tried to log on with MsgSeqNum=3D191. I was expecting=20 > quickfix to start with a new seq. > > Thanks, > Matthew > > qfj beta 3 > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users |
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-03-01 20:07:48
|
Looking at the code it appears the sequences should be reset, however mine are not. Here's the problem senerio: My app shuts down before FixEndTime then starts up the next day after FixStartTime. When the quickfix.SessionSchedule checks to see if isSameSession it returns true because only the time fields are compared and not the date fields. It doesn't check the date fields because the following condition is false: startDay < 0 && endDay < 0 startDay and endDay are 0 for me since I'm using daily sessions and not weekly. If I left my app running outside the session time boundary everything seems to be ok. So, my option as a workaround seems to be reseting manually once a day. Matthew Matthew Stone wrote: > Does quickfix automatically reset sequences when a session changes? > Yesterday I started up a session from FixStartTime=07:00:00 to > FixEndTime=19:00:00 and my app finished the day with MsgSeqNum=190. > Today, my app tried to log on with MsgSeqNum=191. I was expecting > quickfix to start with a new seq. > > Thanks, > Matthew > > qfj beta 3 > |
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-02-28 18:01:12
|
Does quickfix automatically reset sequences when a session changes? Yesterday I started up a session from FixStartTime=07:00:00 to FixEndTime=19:00:00 and my app finished the day with MsgSeqNum=190. Today, my app tried to log on with MsgSeqNum=191. I was expecting quickfix to start with a new seq. Thanks, Matthew qfj beta 3 |
From: rohan j. p. <roh...@re...> - 2006-02-28 13:57:41
|
=A0=0AHi sir,=0A Thanks a lot for the telling me the exact reason, i spent= more than a day to solve the problem, but couldnot find the reason.=0Athan= ks again.=0A=0Awith regards=0Arohan pais=0A=0AOn Tue, 28 Feb 2006 Dave Lina= ker wrote :=0A>I notice:=0A>=0A>- Incoming message has a SendingTime of 11:= 10:06=0A>- Timestamp of reject attempt is at 11:13:00=0A>=0A>Is CheckLatenc= y/MaxLatency set to the default 2 mins?=0A>(http://www.quickfixengine.org/q= uickfix/doc/html/configuration.html#Vali=0A>dation)=0A>=0A>If so, is there = more than a 2 min time difference between the machines?=0A>=0A>cheers=0A>Da= ve=0A>=0A> > -----Original Message-----=0A> > From: quickfix-developers-adm= in...@li...=0A> > [mailto:qui...@li...ur= ceforge.net] On=0A> > Behalf Of Joerg Thoennes=0A> > Sent: 28 February 2006= 11:41=0A> > To: rohan joel pais=0A> > Cc: qui...@li...urce= forge.net;=0A> > qui...@li...=0A> > Subject: Re: [Q= uickfix-developers] problem while connecting=0A> > to engine running on lin= ux=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > QuickFIX Documentation:=0A> > http://www.quickfixengin= e.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html=0A> > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quick= fixengine.org/services.html=0A> >=0A> > Hi Rohan,=0A> >=0A> > for the momen= t, I am assuming your are using QF 1.10...=0A> >=0A> > > - The content of= the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.event is=0A> > > ----------------------------= ---------------------=0A> > > 20060228-11:11:33 : Created session=0A> > > 2= 0060228-11:12:52 : Created session=0A> > > 20060228-11:13:00 : Tried to sen= d a reject while not logged on=0A> > > 20060228-11:13:00 : Dropped Connecti= on=0A> > > -------------------------------------------------=0A> >=0A> > Yo= ur counterparty sent a Logon message, which is invalid and=0A> > would have= been rejected. But=0A> > the other side did not even manage to log on, so = the Reject=0A> > cannot be sent. Sadly, the log=0A> > does not tell the exa= ct reason for rejection.=0A> >=0A> > > -the content of the file FIX.4.2-AAA= AA-BBBBB.incoming=0A> > > -------------------------------------------------= =0A> > >=0A> > 8=3DFIX.4.2^A9=3D71^A35=3DA^A49=3DBBBBB^A56=3DAAAAA^A34=3D1^= A57=3DN0077^A52=3D20060228=0A> > > -11:10:06^A98=3D0^A108=3D30^A10=3D032^A= =0A> > > -------------------------------------------------=0A> >=0A> > I di= d not check the message length and checksum, since QF=0A> > could parse it = (otherwise it=0A> > would simply ignore it instead of rejecting).=0A> >=0A>= > IMHO, all required fields are present and the format of the=0A> > field = values seems to be OK,=0A> > so I wondering whether the message is being re= jected.=0A> >=0A> > Maybe someone else has an idea?=0A> >=0A> > Cheers, J= =F6rg=0A> >=0A> > --=0A> > Joerg Thoennes=0A> > = http://macd.com=0A> > Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associa= tes GmbH=0A> > Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 A= achen=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > ---------------------------------------------------= ----=0A> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking=0A> > s= cripting language that extends applications into web and=0A> > mobile media= . Attend the live webcast and join the prime=0A> > developer group breaking= into this new coding territory!=0A>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd____= _________________________________=0A>__________=0A>Quickfix-developers mail= ing list=0A>Qui...@li...=0A>https://lists.sour= ceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers=0A>=0A |
From: Dave L. <dav...@ma...> - 2006-02-28 12:35:15
|
I notice: - Incoming message has a SendingTime of 11:10:06 - Timestamp of reject attempt is at 11:13:00 Is CheckLatency/MaxLatency set to the default 2 mins? (http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/configuration.html#Vali dation) If so, is there more than a 2 min time difference between the machines? cheers Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li...=20 > [mailto:qui...@li...] On=20 > Behalf Of Joerg Thoennes > Sent: 28 February 2006 11:41 > To: rohan joel pais > Cc: qui...@li...;=20 > qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] problem while connecting=20 > to engine running on linux >=20 >=20 > QuickFIX Documentation:=20 > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >=20 > Hi Rohan, >=20 > for the moment, I am assuming your are using QF 1.10... >=20 > > - The content of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.event is > > ------------------------------------------------- > > 20060228-11:11:33 : Created session > > 20060228-11:12:52 : Created session > > 20060228-11:13:00 : Tried to send a reject while not logged on=20 > > 20060228-11:13:00 : Dropped Connection > > ------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Your counterparty sent a Logon message, which is invalid and=20 > would have been rejected. But=20 > the other side did not even manage to log on, so the Reject=20 > cannot be sent. Sadly, the log=20 > does not tell the exact reason for rejection. >=20 > > -the content of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.incoming > > ------------------------------------------------- > >=20 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2^A9=3D71^A35=3DA^A49=3DBBBBB^A56=3DAAAAA^A34=3D1^A57=3DN0077^A= 52=3D20060228 > > -11:10:06^A98=3D0^A108=3D30^A10=3D032^A > > ------------------------------------------------- >=20 > I did not check the message length and checksum, since QF=20 > could parse it (otherwise it=20 > would simply ignore it instead of rejecting). >=20 > IMHO, all required fields are present and the format of the=20 > field values seems to be OK,=20 > so I wondering whether the message is being rejected. >=20 > Maybe someone else has an idea? >=20 > Cheers, J=F6rg >=20 > --=20 > Joerg Thoennes > http://macd.com > Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associates GmbH > Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking=20 > scripting language that extends applications into web and=20 > mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime=20 > developer group breaking into this new coding territory!=20 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_____________________________________ __________ Quickfix-developers mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers |
From: Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...> - 2006-02-28 11:40:44
|
Hi Rohan, for the moment, I am assuming your are using QF 1.10... > - The content of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.event is > ------------------------------------------------- > 20060228-11:11:33 : Created session > 20060228-11:12:52 : Created session > 20060228-11:13:00 : Tried to send a reject while not logged on > 20060228-11:13:00 : Dropped Connection > ------------------------------------------------- Your counterparty sent a Logon message, which is invalid and would have b= een rejected. But=20 the other side did not even manage to log on, so the Reject cannot be sen= t. Sadly, the log=20 does not tell the exact reason for rejection. > -the content of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.incoming > ------------------------------------------------- > 8=3DFIX.4.2^A9=3D71^A35=3DA^A49=3DBBBBB^A56=3DAAAAA^A34=3D1^A57=3DN0077= ^A52=3D20060228-11:10:06^A98=3D0^A108=3D30^A10=3D032^A > ------------------------------------------------- I did not check the message length and checksum, since QF could parse it = (otherwise it=20 would simply ignore it instead of rejecting). IMHO, all required fields are present and the format of the field values = seems to be OK,=20 so I wondering whether the message is being rejected. Maybe someone else has an idea? Cheers, J=F6rg --=20 Joerg Thoennes http://macd.com Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associates GmbH Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen |
From: rohan j. p. <roh...@re...> - 2006-02-28 11:23:38
|
=A0=0Ahi,=0A - The content of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.event is=0A---= ----------------------------------------------=0A20060228-11:11:33 : Create= d session=0A20060228-11:12:52 : Created session=0A20060228-11:13:00 : Tried= to send a reject while not logged on=0A20060228-11:13:00 : Dropped Connect= ion=0A-------------------------------------------------=0A =0A-the content = of the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.incoming=0A--------------------------------= -----------------=0A8=3DFIX.4.2^A9=3D71^A35=3DA^A49=3DBBBBB^A56=3DAAAAA^A34= =3D1^A57=3DN0077^A52=3D20060228-11:10:06^A98=3D0^A108=3D30^A10=3D032^A=0A--= -----------------------------------------------=0A=0A- the file FIX.4.2-AAA= AA-BBBBB.outgoing is empty=0A- the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.body is empty= =0A- the file FIX.4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.session as content 1 : 1=0A- the file FIX= .4.2-AAAAA-BBBBB.header is empty=0A=0Awith regards=0Arohan=0A=0AOn Tue, 28 = Feb 2006 Joerg Thoennes wrote :=0A>Hi Rohan,=0A>=0A>> i am unable to conn= ect to the acceptor application running in linux machine from a initiator a= pplication running in windows machine.=0A>>however from some windows machin= e it will establish a connection.=0A>>Can anybody help me regarding this pr= oblem.=0A>=0A>Please, could you provide the usual details (versions, logs, = etc. etc.).=0A>=0A>Cheers, J=F6rg=0A>=0A>-- Joerg Thoennes=0A> = http://macd.com=0A>Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdon= ald Associates GmbH=0A>Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D= -52070 Aachen=0A |
From: Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...> - 2006-02-28 09:15:47
|
Hi Rohan, > i am unable to connect to the acceptor application running in linux m= achine from a initiator application running in windows machine. > however from some windows machine it will establish a connection. > Can anybody help me regarding this problem. Please, could you provide the usual details (versions, logs, etc. etc.). Cheers, J=F6rg --=20 Joerg Thoennes http://macd.com Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associates GmbH Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen |
From: John H. <jhe...@bo...> - 2006-02-24 16:48:15
|
I think you are too, and there's your problem. ;^) QF/J uses the stock Java SimpleDateFormat to parse the session start and end times. Strings with no date, just times, end up in 1970 -- when GMT was an hour later than UTC. So until you added the time zone, your session would have been set up to end at 22:50 local time (21:50 UTC).=20 I'll submit a patch for this, but in the meantime, setting TimeZone does obviously fix it. More info at = http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D4644278. John -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Kimpton, C (Chris) Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:31 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) Hi, I think I am in English/GMT time zone (it's a locked down production box, so I can't see the window for it... Here is the config file: [...] TimeZone=3DEurope/London StartTime=3D00:01:00 EndTime=3D21:50:00 |
From: Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...> - 2006-02-24 14:35:32
|
Hi, I think I am in English/GMT time zone (it's a locked down production box, so I can't see the window for it... Here is the config file: [DEFAULT] ConnectionType=3Dinitiator HeartBtInt=3D20 FileStorePath=3Dstore TimeZone=3DEurope/London StartTime=3D00:01:00 EndTime=3D21:50:00 UseDataDictionary=3DY DataDictionary=3D../config/FIX42.xml SocketConnectHost=3Dxxx SocketConnectPort=3Dyyy #failover SocketConnectHost1=3Dlocalhost SocketConnectPort1=3D5420 ReconnectInterval=3D10 ResetOnDisconnect=3DY ResetOnLogout=3DY SendResetSeqNumFlag=3DY ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=3DN CheckLatency=3DN FileLogPath=3Dfixlogs SocketNodelay=3DY [SESSION] BeginString=3DFIX.4.2 SenderCompID=3Drabo TargetCompID=3DFIX Thanks, Chris=20 -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of John Hensley Sent: 23 February 2006 23:04 To: qui...@li... Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Chris, could you please send the schedule-related snippets of the config files used to produce these logs? And what is your local system time zone? Thanks, John -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Kimpton, C (Chris) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:16 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Hi, Here is the log from the jni run: <20060215-21:54:53, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D0=0134=3D5128=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :54:53.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 228=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D5=0134=3D5129=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :55:00.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 227=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Disconnecting) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Socket Error) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Connecting to localhost on port 542) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Connecting to localhost on port 543)=20 I didn't notice the log times being different from GMT but I have always ducked the question of what is UTC... Note this was running on the same Windows (?) PC as I ran the QFJ version - so I guess UTC should have been in sync. With the QFJ version, I get this message at startup: <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Session FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX schedule is daily, 23:01:00 UTC - 20:50:00 UTC (00:01:00 GMT - 21:50:00 GMT)) <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Created session: FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX) I did not test the QFJ version prior to Beta3 on this matter. Thanks, Chris _____________________________________________________________ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri= vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t= he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple= ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing= , copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents = of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason= able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno= t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i= n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of = this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of = the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in= formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an= =20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _____________________________________________________________ |
From: John H. <jhe...@bo...> - 2006-02-23 23:03:54
|
Chris, could you please send the schedule-related snippets of the config files used to produce these logs? And what is your local system time zone? Thanks, John -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Kimpton, C (Chris) Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:16 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Hi, Here is the log from the jni run: <20060215-21:54:53, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D0=0134=3D5128=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :54:53.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 228=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D5=0134=3D5129=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :55:00.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 227=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Disconnecting) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Socket Error) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Connecting to localhost on port 542) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Connecting to localhost on port 543)=20 I didn't notice the log times being different from GMT but I have always ducked the question of what is UTC... Note this was running on the same Windows (?) PC as I ran the QFJ version - so I guess UTC should have been in sync. With the QFJ version, I get this message at startup: <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Session FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX schedule is daily, 23:01:00 UTC - 20:50:00 UTC (00:01:00 GMT - 21:50:00 GMT)) <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Created session: FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX) I did not test the QFJ version prior to Beta3 on this matter. Thanks, Chris -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Oren Miller Sent: 22 February 2006 17:03 To: Steve Bate Cc: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Not just default, it currently only support UTC. --oren Steve Bate wrote: >QuickFIX Documentation:=20 >http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > >Hi John, > >I have the same question. I thought the C++/JNI code used UTC as a=20 >default. Oren, can you clarify which is used? > >Steve Bate >Smart Trade Technologies >Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97 >http://www.smart-trade.net/ > > > =20 > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: qui...@li... >>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of John=20 >>Hensley >>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:37 PM >>To: qui...@li... >>Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J=20 >>1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >> >>QuickFIX Documentation:=20 >>http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >>Then I broke backward compatibility with the addition of time zones -- >>you shouldn't need to change your config. My understanding was that=20 >>previously the session times were always assumed to be UTC; that was=20 >>my experience with QF/J, and the impetus for adding time zones. You=20 >>said the JNI version would log out at 21:55 local time? By chance, did >>you ever try a QuickFIX/J version prior to Beta 3 that also logged out >>then? >> >>John >> _____________________________________________________________ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _____________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users |
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-02-23 22:44:41
|
Steve, Waiting for the onLogon callback fixed the problem. Thanks, Matthew Steve Bate wrote: > QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > Hi Matthew, > > Is it only the first order after logon that has the problem? > > Do you send the order immediately after the session create or > after you receive the onLogon callback? > > Have you tried getting a thread dump during that first three minutes > to see if any threads are blocked in suspicious places (e.g., deadlock)? > I'm guessing there's no deadlock because the heartbeat would not be > sent if the session was locked. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: qui...@li... >> [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf >> Of Matthew Stone >> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:34 PM >> To: Oren Miller >> Cc: qui...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] qfj First order after startup >> is not sent >> >> QuickFIX Documentation: >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >> The first order will get sent after 3 minutes if I dont send >> a second order any earlier. Basically, the receiver will >> notice a missing sequence number between the login and first >> heartbeat. So, after quickfix gets the ResendRequest then >> it sends off the first order. >> >> >> Events: >> 20060223-20:00:31: Session FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID >> schedule is daily, 00:00:00 UTC - 00:00:00 UTC >> 20060223-20:00:31: Created session: FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID >> 20060223-20:00:32: Initiated logon request >> 20060223-20:00:32: Received logon response >> 20060223-20:03:32: Received ResendRequest FROM: 579 TO: 0 >> 20060223-20:03:32: Resending Message: 579 >> 20060223-20:03:32: Sent SequenceReset TO: 581 >> >> >> Messages: >> 8=FIX.4.29=6635=A34=57849=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:00:31.94 >> 956=OTHRCOMPID98=0108=18010=002 >> 8=FIX.4.29=006235=A49=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :00:3034=70498=0108=18010=128 >> 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :02:5434=70510=046 >> 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58049=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:32.85 >> 656=OTHRCOMPID10=152 >> 8=FIX.4.29=006035=249=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :03:3034=7067=57916=010=020 >> 8=FIX.4.29=14735=D34=57943=Y49=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03 >> :32.97056=OTHRCOMPID122=20060223-20:00:32128=APP11=100203 >> 21=138=2040=154=155=LU60=20060223-20:00:3110=147 >> 8=FIX.4.29=9335=434=58043=Y49=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03: >> 32.97456=OTHRCOMPID122=20060223-20:03:3236=581123=Y10=062 >> 8=FIX.4.29=020435=8115=APP143=TargetHostIP49=OTHRCOMPID5 >> 6=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:3034=70737=302253311=10020320 >> =0150=039=038=2014=0151=2055=LU54=16=0.000000001=MYCO >> MPID40=159=0109=MYCOMPID17=032=031=0.0000000010=227 >> 8=FIX.4.29=023035=8115=APP143=TargetHostIP49=OTHRCOMPID5 >> 6=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:3334=70837=302253311=10020320 >> =0150=239=25034=F38=2014=20151=055=LU54=16=3.2730=NY >> SE17=302056832=2031=3.2760=20060223-20:03:33113=N5037=N >> 19=110810=223 >> 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :05:5434=70910=053 >> 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58149=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:06:33.86 >> 156=OTHRCOMPID10=153 >> 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :08:1834=71010=048 >> 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58249=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:09:34.85 >> 456=OTHRCOMPID10=160 >> 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20 >> :10:4234=71110=039 >> >> >> Oren Miller wrote: >> >>> Do you have any logs? >>> >>> --oren >>> >>> Matthew Stone wrote: >>> >>> >>>> QuickFIX Documentation: >>>> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >>>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >>>> >>>> After startup the first order is not sent until a second order is >>>> submitted. How can I get the first order to be sent normally? >>>> This is basically what I'm doing: >>>> >>>> initiator = new SocketInitiator (this, >>>> >> messageStoreFactory, settings, >> >>>> logFactory, messageFactory); >>>> initiator.start(); >>>> ... >>>> public void onCreate (SessionID sessionId) { >>>> this.sessionID = sessionId >>>> } >>>> ... >>>> Session.sendToTarget (buildSingleOrder (order), sessionID); >>>> >>>> version: quickfixj-1.0.0b3 >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >>>> language >>>> that extends applications into web and mobile media. >>>> >> Attend the live >> >>>> webcast >>>> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >>>> territory! >>>> >>>> >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720& >> dat=121642 >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Quickfix-users mailing list >>>> Qui...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking >> scripting language >> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend >> the live webcast >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new >> coding territory! >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720& >> dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Quickfix-users mailing list >> Qui...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > |
From: Steve B. <sb...@sm...> - 2006-02-23 22:10:32
|
Hi Matthew, Is it only the first order after logon that has the problem? Do you send the order immediately after the session create or after you receive the onLogon callback? Have you tried getting a thread dump during that first three minutes to see if any threads are blocked in suspicious places (e.g., deadlock)? I'm guessing there's no deadlock because the heartbeat would not be sent if the session was locked. > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li...=20 > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Matthew Stone > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 9:34 PM > To: Oren Miller > Cc: qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] qfj First order after startup=20 > is not sent >=20 > QuickFIX Documentation:=20 > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >=20 > The first order will get sent after 3 minutes if I dont send=20 > a second order any earlier. Basically, the receiver will=20 > notice a missing sequence number between the login and first=20 > heartbeat. So, after quickfix gets the ResendRequest then=20 > it sends off the first order. >=20 >=20 > Events: > 20060223-20:00:31: Session FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID=20 > schedule is daily, 00:00:00 UTC - 00:00:00 UTC > 20060223-20:00:31: Created session: FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID > 20060223-20:00:32: Initiated logon request > 20060223-20:00:32: Received logon response > 20060223-20:03:32: Received ResendRequest FROM: 579 TO: 0 > 20060223-20:03:32: Resending Message: 579 > 20060223-20:03:32: Sent SequenceReset TO: 581 >=20 >=20 > Messages: > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D66=0135=3DA=0134=3D578=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-= 20:00:31.94 > 9=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=0198=3D0=01108=3D180=0110=3D002=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0062=0135=3DA=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :00:30=0134=3D704=0198=3D0=01108=3D180=0110=3D128=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0049=0135=3D0=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :02:54=0134=3D705=0110=3D046=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D53=0135=3D0=0134=3D580=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-= 20:03:32.85 > 6=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=0110=3D152=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0060=0135=3D2=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :03:30=0134=3D706=017=3D579=0116=3D0=0110=3D020=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D147=0135=3DD=0134=3D579=0143=3DY=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20:03 > = :32.970=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=01122=3D20060223-20:00:32=01128=3DAPP=0111=3D10= 0203=01 > = 21=3D1=0138=3D20=0140=3D1=0154=3D1=0155=3DLU=0160=3D20060223-20:00:31=011= 0=3D147=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D93=0135=3D4=0134=3D580=0143=3DY=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20:03: > = 32.974=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=01122=3D20060223-20:03:32=0136=3D581=01123=3DY=01= 10=3D062=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0204=0135=3D8=01115=3DAPP=01143=3DTargetHostIP=0149=3DO= THRCOMPID=015 > = 6=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-20:03:30=0134=3D707=0137=3D3022533=0111=3D10= 0203=0120 > = =3D0=01150=3D0=0139=3D0=0138=3D20=0114=3D0=01151=3D20=0155=3DLU=0154=3D1=01= 6=3D0.00000000=011=3DMYCO > = MPID=0140=3D1=0159=3D0=01109=3DMYCOMPID=0117=3D0=0132=3D0=0131=3D0.000000= 00=0110=3D227=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0230=0135=3D8=01115=3DAPP=01143=3DTargetHostIP=0149=3DO= THRCOMPID=015 > = 6=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-20:03:33=0134=3D708=0137=3D3022533=0111=3D10= 0203=0120 > = =3D0=01150=3D2=0139=3D2=015034=3DF=0138=3D20=0114=3D20=01151=3D0=0155=3DL= U=0154=3D1=016=3D3.27=0130=3DNY > = SE=0117=3D3020568=0132=3D20=0131=3D3.27=0160=3D20060223-20:03:33=01113=3D= N=015037=3DN=01 > 19=3D1108=0110=3D223=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0049=0135=3D0=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :05:54=0134=3D709=0110=3D053=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D53=0135=3D0=0134=3D581=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-= 20:06:33.86 > 1=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=0110=3D153=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0049=0135=3D0=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :08:18=0134=3D710=0110=3D048=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D53=0135=3D0=0134=3D582=0149=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D20060223-= 20:09:34.85 > 4=0156=3DOTHRCOMPID=0110=3D160=01 > = 8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D0049=0135=3D0=0149=3DOTHRCOMPID=0156=3DMYCOMPID=0152=3D= 20060223-20 > :10:42=0134=3D711=0110=3D039=01 >=20 >=20 > Oren Miller wrote: > > Do you have any logs? > > > > --oren > > > > Matthew Stone wrote: > > > >> QuickFIX Documentation:=20 > >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > >> > >> After startup the first order is not sent until a second order is=20 > >> submitted. How can I get the first order to be sent normally? > >> This is basically what I'm doing: > >> > >> initiator =3D new SocketInitiator (this,=20 > messageStoreFactory, settings,=20 > >> logFactory, messageFactory); > >> initiator.start(); > >> ... > >> public void onCreate (SessionID sessionId) { > >> this.sessionID =3D sessionId > >> } > >> ... > >> Session.sendToTarget (buildSingleOrder (order), sessionID); > >> > >> version: quickfixj-1.0.0b3 > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting=20 > >> language > >> that extends applications into web and mobile media.=20 > Attend the live=20 > >> webcast > >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding=20 > >> territory! > >>=20 > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720& > dat=3D121642 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Quickfix-users mailing list > >> Qui...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > >> > >> >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking=20 > scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend=20 > the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new=20 > coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720& > dat=3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >=20 |
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-02-23 20:33:53
|
The first order will get sent after 3 minutes if I dont send a second order any earlier. Basically, the receiver will notice a missing sequence number between the login and first heartbeat. So, after quickfix gets the ResendRequest then it sends off the first order. Events: 20060223-20:00:31: Session FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID schedule is daily, 00:00:00 UTC - 00:00:00 UTC 20060223-20:00:31: Created session: FIX.4.2:MYCOMPID->OTHRCOMPID 20060223-20:00:32: Initiated logon request 20060223-20:00:32: Received logon response 20060223-20:03:32: Received ResendRequest FROM: 579 TO: 0 20060223-20:03:32: Resending Message: 579 20060223-20:03:32: Sent SequenceReset TO: 581 Messages: 8=FIX.4.29=6635=A34=57849=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:00:31.94956=OTHRCOMPID98=0108=18010=002 8=FIX.4.29=006235=A49=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:00:3034=70498=0108=18010=128 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:02:5434=70510=046 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58049=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:32.85656=OTHRCOMPID10=152 8=FIX.4.29=006035=249=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:3034=7067=57916=010=020 8=FIX.4.29=14735=D34=57943=Y49=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:32.97056=OTHRCOMPID122=20060223-20:00:32128=APP11=10020321=138=2040=154=155=LU60=20060223-20:00:3110=147 8=FIX.4.29=9335=434=58043=Y49=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:32.97456=OTHRCOMPID122=20060223-20:03:3236=581123=Y10=062 8=FIX.4.29=020435=8115=APP143=TargetHostIP49=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:3034=70737=302253311=10020320=0150=039=038=2014=0151=2055=LU54=16=0.000000001=MYCOMPID40=159=0109=MYCOMPID17=032=031=0.0000000010=227 8=FIX.4.29=023035=8115=APP143=TargetHostIP49=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:03:3334=70837=302253311=10020320=0150=239=25034=F38=2014=20151=055=LU54=16=3.2730=NYSE17=302056832=2031=3.2760=20060223-20:03:33113=N5037=N19=110810=223 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:05:5434=70910=053 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58149=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:06:33.86156=OTHRCOMPID10=153 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:08:1834=71010=048 8=FIX.4.29=5335=034=58249=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:09:34.85456=OTHRCOMPID10=160 8=FIX.4.29=004935=049=OTHRCOMPID56=MYCOMPID52=20060223-20:10:4234=71110=039 Oren Miller wrote: > Do you have any logs? > > --oren > > Matthew Stone wrote: > >> QuickFIX Documentation: >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >> After startup the first order is not sent until a second order is >> submitted. How can I get the first order to be sent normally? >> This is basically what I'm doing: >> >> initiator = new SocketInitiator (this, messageStoreFactory, settings, >> logFactory, messageFactory); >> initiator.start(); >> ... >> public void onCreate (SessionID sessionId) { >> this.sessionID = sessionId >> } >> ... >> Session.sendToTarget (buildSingleOrder (order), sessionID); >> >> version: quickfixj-1.0.0b3 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >> language >> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live >> webcast >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >> territory! >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Quickfix-users mailing list >> Qui...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >> >> |
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-02-23 19:53:04
|
Do you have any logs? --oren Matthew Stone wrote: > QuickFIX Documentation: > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > > After startup the first order is not sent until a second order is > submitted. How can I get the first order to be sent normally? > This is basically what I'm doing: > > initiator = new SocketInitiator (this, messageStoreFactory, settings, > logFactory, messageFactory); > initiator.start(); > ... > public void onCreate (SessionID sessionId) { > this.sessionID = sessionId > } > ... > Session.sendToTarget (buildSingleOrder (order), sessionID); > > version: quickfixj-1.0.0b3 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > |
From: Matthew S. <ms...@bi...> - 2006-02-23 19:34:18
|
After startup the first order is not sent until a second order is submitted. How can I get the first order to be sent normally? This is basically what I'm doing: initiator = new SocketInitiator (this, messageStoreFactory, settings, logFactory, messageFactory); initiator.start(); ... public void onCreate (SessionID sessionId) { this.sessionID = sessionId } ... Session.sendToTarget (buildSingleOrder (order), sessionID); version: quickfixj-1.0.0b3 |
From: Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...> - 2006-02-23 08:15:50
|
Hi, Here is the log from the jni run: <20060215-21:54:53, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D0=0134=3D5128=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :54:53.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 228=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, outgoing> =20 (8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D83=0135=3D5=0134=3D5129=0149=3Drabo=0152=3D20060215-21= :55:00.839=0156=3DFIX=0110=3D 227=01) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Disconnecting) <20060215-21:55:00, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Socket Error) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Connecting to localhost on port 542) <20060216-00:01:01, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> =20 (Connecting to localhost on port 543)=20 I didn't notice the log times being different from GMT but I have always ducked the question of what is UTC... Note this was running on the same Windows (?) PC as I ran the QFJ version - so I guess UTC should have been in sync. With the QFJ version, I get this message at startup: <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Session FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX schedule is daily, 23:01:00 UTC - 20:50:00 UTC (00:01:00 GMT - 21:50:00 GMT)) <20060223-06:44:47, FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX, event> (Created session: FIX.4.2:rabo->FIX) I did not test the QFJ version prior to Beta3 on this matter. Thanks, Chris -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Oren Miller Sent: 22 February 2006 17:03 To: Steve Bate Cc: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html Not just default, it currently only support UTC. --oren Steve Bate wrote: >QuickFIX Documentation:=20 >http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > >Hi John, > >I have the same question. I thought the C++/JNI code used UTC as a=20 >default. Oren, can you clarify which is used? > >Steve Bate >Smart Trade Technologies >Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97 >http://www.smart-trade.net/ > > > =20 > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: qui...@li... >>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of John=20 >>Hensley >>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:37 PM >>To: qui...@li... >>Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J=20 >>1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >> >>QuickFIX Documentation:=20 >>http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >>Then I broke backward compatibility with the addition of time zones -- >>you shouldn't need to change your config. My understanding was that=20 >>previously the session times were always assumed to be UTC; that was=20 >>my experience with QF/J, and the impetus for adding time zones. You=20 >>said the JNI version would log out at 21:55 local time? By chance, did >>you ever try a QuickFIX/J version prior to Beta 3 that also logged out >>then? >> >>John >> _____________________________________________________________ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri= vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t= he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple= ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing= , copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents = of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason= able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno= t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i= n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of = this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of = the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in= formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an= =20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _____________________________________________________________ |
From: Oren M. <or...@qu...> - 2006-02-22 17:03:17
|
Not just default, it currently only support UTC. --oren Steve Bate wrote: >QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html > >Hi John, > >I have the same question. I thought the C++/JNI code used UTC >as a default. Oren, can you clarify which is used? > >Steve Bate >Smart Trade Technologies >Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97 >http://www.smart-trade.net/ > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: qui...@li... >>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf >>Of John Hensley >>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:37 PM >>To: qui...@li... >>Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re >>QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >> >>QuickFIX Documentation: >>http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html >>QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >> >>Then I broke backward compatibility with the addition of time >>zones -- you shouldn't need to change your config. My >>understanding was that previously the session times were >>always assumed to be UTC; that was my experience with QF/J, >>and the impetus for adding time zones. You said the JNI >>version would log out at 21:55 local time? By chance, did you >>ever try a QuickFIX/J version prior to Beta 3 that also >>logged out then? >> >>John >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: qui...@li... >>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf >>Of Kimpton, C (Chris) >>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:30 AM >>To: qui...@li... >>Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re >>QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >> >>Thanks Toby - that was it, no time zone specified. >> >>Chris >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: qui...@li... >>[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf >>Of Shepheard, Toby (London) >>Sent: 22 February 2006 10:18 >>To: qui...@li... >>Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re >>QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >> >>It could also be a time-zone issue, as time zone can now be >>specified in the config file and, if not, QuickFIX/J will >>assume UTC. If you aren't in UTC and haven't specified the >>timezone, this could account for the problem. >> >>Regards, >>Toby >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep >>through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX >>search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as >>surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! >>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 >>_______________________________________________ >>Quickfix-users mailing list >>Qui...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >> >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files >for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes >searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 >_______________________________________________ >Quickfix-users mailing list >Qui...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > |
From: Steve B. <sb...@sm...> - 2006-02-22 16:11:43
|
Hi John, I have the same question. I thought the C++/JNI code used UTC as a default. Oren, can you clarify which is used? Steve Bate Smart Trade Technologies Phone: +33 4 42 90 03 97 http://www.smart-trade.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li...=20 > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of John Hensley > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:37 PM > To: qui...@li... > Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re=20 > QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >=20 > QuickFIX Documentation:=20 > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html >=20 > Then I broke backward compatibility with the addition of time=20 > zones -- you shouldn't need to change your config. My=20 > understanding was that previously the session times were=20 > always assumed to be UTC; that was my experience with QF/J,=20 > and the impetus for adding time zones. You said the JNI=20 > version would log out at 21:55 local time? By chance, did you=20 > ever try a QuickFIX/J version prior to Beta 3 that also=20 > logged out then? >=20 > John >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li... > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Kimpton, C (Chris) > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:30 AM > To: qui...@li... > Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re=20 > QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >=20 > Thanks Toby - that was it, no time zone specified. >=20 > Chris >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: qui...@li... > [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf=20 > Of Shepheard, Toby (London) > Sent: 22 February 2006 10:18 > To: qui...@li... > Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re=20 > QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) >=20 > It could also be a time-zone issue, as time zone can now be=20 > specified in the config file and, if not, QuickFIX/J will=20 > assume UTC. If you aren't in UTC and haven't specified the=20 > timezone, this could account for the problem. >=20 > Regards, > Toby >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep=20 > through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX=20 > search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as=20 > surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=103432&bid#0486&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users >=20 |
From: John H. <jhe...@bo...> - 2006-02-22 15:37:26
|
Then I broke backward compatibility with the addition of time zones -- you shouldn't need to change your config. My understanding was that previously the session times were always assumed to be UTC; that was my experience with QF/J, and the impetus for adding time zones. You said the JNI version would log out at 21:55 local time? By chance, did you ever try a QuickFIX/J version prior to Beta 3 that also logged out then? John -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Kimpton, C (Chris) Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:30 AM To: qui...@li... Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) Thanks Toby - that was it, no time zone specified. Chris -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Shepheard, Toby (London) Sent: 22 February 2006 10:18 To: qui...@li... Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) It could also be a time-zone issue, as time zone can now be specified in the config file and, if not, QuickFIX/J will assume UTC. If you aren't in UTC and haven't specified the timezone, this could account for the problem. Regards, Toby |
From: Dale W. <wil...@oc...> - 2006-02-22 14:25:40
|
Hi Laurent, To act as an initiator using a different protocol/communications method derive your class from the FIX::Initiator interface in Initiator.h and implement the virtual methos. To act as an acceptor ... derive from FIX::Acceptor interface in Acceptor.h. Dale Lau...@cf... wrote: > > Hi again > > Sorry for the lack of precision in my previous post : > > - I'm using C++ version of quickFIX (1.10.2) > - And my problem is : > > I want to bypass the socket classes provided in > QuickFIX by replacing them with my own client/server > classes. > > But I'm a little bit lost in the quickFix classes ocean ;) > and I dont see clearly how to make a seamless > integration of custom user socket classes inside the > quickfix framework. > > regards, > Laurent. -- ----------------------------------------------------- Dale Wilson, Senior Software Engineer Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) http://www.ociweb.com/ http://www.theaceorb.com/ ---------------------------------------------------- |
From: <Lau...@cf...> - 2006-02-22 14:07:30
|
Hi again Sorry for the lack of precision in my previous post : - I'm using C++ version of quickFIX (1.10.2) - And my problem is : I want to bypass the socket classes provided in QuickFIX by replacing them with my own client/server classes. But I'm a little bit lost in the quickFix classes ocean ;) and I dont see clearly how to make a seamless integration of custom user socket classes inside the quickfix framework. regards, Laurent. |
From: Kimpton, C \(Chris\) <Chr...@ra...> - 2006-02-22 11:29:47
|
Thanks Toby - that was it, no time zone specified. Chris -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Shepheard, Toby (London) Sent: 22 February 2006 10:18 To: qui...@li... Subject: [Quickfix-users] Re QFJ Session times (was Re QuickFIX/J 1.0.0 Beta 3 Released) QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html It could also be a time-zone issue, as time zone can now be specified in the config file and, if not, QuickFIX/J will assume UTC. If you aren't in UTC and haven't specified the timezone, this could account for the problem. Regards, Toby _____________________________________________________________ This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally pri= vileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of t= he intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, ple= ase advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing= , copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents = of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reason= able precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we canno= t accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses i= n this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of = this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of = the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that in= formation is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an= =20offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat. _____________________________________________________________ |