quickfix-developers — QuickFIX developers forum

Re: [Quickfix-developers] JNI

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

They are done manually, except for the headers which are generated.   
Only the public objects our wrapped, and even then the least used  
methods often won't be wrapped until someone requests it.  We would  
be interested in having something like SWIG generate the API in the  
future as is done with ruby and python.

--oren

On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Alvin Wang wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone tell me how QuickFIX creates it JNI wrapper? QF has a  
> lot of
> classes, so I think it would be a huge amount of work to create JNI
> manfully.
>
> Thank you!
> Alvin
>
>
>
>                                                                  
> ********************************************************************** 
> *********
> This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
> The message may contain information that is privileged and
> confidential.
> Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
> distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise.  
> Instead,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
> message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
> message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of   
> transmitting
> software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
> virus checks on any attachment to this message.  We accept
> no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
> ********************************************************************** 
> *********
>
>
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] JNI

[Alvin W. <AW...@FF...>]

Sorry, I mean "manually". The spelling check messed up. :)




                                                                           
             Alvin Wang/FFTW                                               
                                                                           
             06/25/2007 10:58                                           To 
             AM                        qui...@li... 
                                       ge.net                              
                                                                        cc 
                                       Oren Miller                         
                                       <or...@qu...>           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       JNI                                 
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           


Hi,

Could anyone tell me how QuickFIX creates it JNI wrapper? QF has a lot of
classes, so I think it would be a huge amount of work to create JNI
manfully.

Thank you!
Alvin



                                                                *******************************************************************************
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and 
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of  transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message.  We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
*******************************************************************************

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

The current release requires that the FileLogPath be defined in the  
SESSION section, which is a bug.  But if you put it there it should  
work.

--oren

On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Naveed Ali wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> When I used FileLog instead of ScreenLog the application throws error
> that  "FileLogPath not defined"
> Search at Nabble (QuickFix Forum) that it is a bug in current  
> release..
> is it the case or not..
>
> Kindly help..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:35 PM
> To: Naveed Ali
> Cc: qui...@li...; quickfix-
> Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console
>
> Don't use the ScreenLog.
>
> --oren
>
> On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Naveed Ali wrote:
>
>> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/
>> html/index.html
>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>
>> Hello All FIXians,
>>
>> Though I have not received the reply on my previous message but I am
>> confident of receiving the reply on this one...
>>
>> I want to hide/remove the messages that appear on the Console of
>> Application when it is opened.
>>
>> I don't want to show the messages to my client what are outgoing /
>> incoming message in the application.
>>
>> Is there any way to do this...?
>>
>> With regards
>> -Naveed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> -
>
>> ---
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfix-developers mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

[Quickfix-developers] JNI

[Alvin W. <AW...@FF...>]

Hi,

Could anyone tell me how QuickFIX creates it JNI wrapper? QF has a lot of
classes, so I think it would be a huge amount of work to create JNI
manfully.

Thank you!
Alvin



                                                                *******************************************************************************
This e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.
The message may contain information that is privileged and 
confidential.
Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate,
distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail(including the original
message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the
message. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of  transmitting
software viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own
virus checks on any attachment to this message.  We accept
no liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
*******************************************************************************

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console

[Naveed A. <na...@nc...>]

When I used FileLog instead of ScreenLog the application throws error
that  "FileLogPath not defined"
Search at Nabble (QuickFix Forum) that it is a bug in current release..
is it the case or not..

Kindly help..

-----Original Message-----
From: Oren Miller [mailto:or...@qu...]=20
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:35 PM
To: Naveed Ali
Cc: qui...@li...; quickfix-=20
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console

Don't use the ScreenLog.

--oren

On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Naveed Ali wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/=20
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hello All FIXians,
>
> Though I have not received the reply on my previous message but I am
> confident of receiving the reply on this one...
>
> I want to hide/remove the messages that appear on the Console of
> Application when it is opened.
>
> I don't want to show the messages to my client what are outgoing /
> incoming message in the application.
>
> Is there any way to do this...?
>
> With regards
> -Naveed
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] [Quickfix-users] DLL defendancy issue..................

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

Hi Eranga,

Almost sure that Visual C++ runtime DLLs are missing, as I already posted.
Along with Visual Studio, there is a package you can use to install
them or you can download it from Microsoft web site, Visual Studio
2005 has a new version of the runtime for  the SP1, you should know if
you have installed it.

Download Dependecy Walker to help you find if any other DLL is missing.

Djalma

On 6/23/07, Eranga Samararathna <pe...@ri...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to run the quickfix 1.12.4 on windows . I took a fresh machine and
> installed java 1.5 and msxml3 there. Then I ran a  my program there to test
> JNI. ( Pl look the code below ) . Then I am got the following error.
>
>
>
> C:\fix_test\test_JNI\bin>java -Djava.library.path=../lib JNITest
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> C:\fix_test\test_JNI\
>
> lib\quickfix_jni.dll: This application has failed to start because the
> applicati
>
> on configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this
> problem
>
>
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
> Method)
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown
> Source)
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown
> Source)
>
>         at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
>
>         at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
>
>         at JNITest.<clinit>(JNITest.java:8)
>
>
>
> My Djava.library.path was correct. All other classpaths were ok. I think
> quickifix depends on some other .dll on windows plat form. I can't figure
> out what are they. Because when I install the Visual Studio 2005 IDE. It
> start working. I am wonder what is this hidden dependency.
>
>
>
> I build the quickfix using VS2005 on Windows XP .
>
>
>
> public class JNITest{
>
>
>
>                 static{
>
>                                 System.loadLibrary("quickfix_jni");
>
>                 }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{
>
>
>
>                 System.out.println("Start the JNI Compatibility Test
> Program....");
>
>
>
>                 Message m = new Message();
>
>                 SessionSettings settings = new SessionSettings(new
> FileInputStream("../test.cfg"));
>
>                 MessageStoreFactory messageStoreFactory = new
> FileStoreFactory(settings);
>
>                 LogFactory logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);
>
>                 MessageFactory messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory();
>
>
>
>
>
>                 System.out.println("Successfully Loaded the JNI....");
>
>                 }
>
> }
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Eranga
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>

[Quickfix-developers] DLL defendancy issue..................

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Hi,

 

I want to run the quickfix 1.12.4 on windows . I took a fresh machine and
installed java 1.5 and msxml3 there. Then I ran a  my program there to test
JNI. ( Pl look the code below ) . Then I am got the following error.

 

C:\fix_test\test_JNI\bin>java -Djava.library.path=../lib JNITest

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
C:\fix_test\test_JNI\

lib\quickfix_jni.dll: This application has failed to start because the
applicati

on configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this
problem

 

        at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)

        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)

        at JNITest.<clinit>(JNITest.java:8)

 

My Djava.library.path was correct. All other classpaths were ok. I think
quickifix depends on some other .dll on windows plat form. I can't figure
out what are they. Because when I install the Visual Studio 2005 IDE. It
start working. I am wonder what is this hidden dependency.

 

I build the quickfix using VS2005 on Windows XP .

 

public class JNITest{

 

                static{

                                System.loadLibrary("quickfix_jni");

                }

 

 

 

public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{

 

                System.out.println("Start the JNI Compatibility Test
Program....");

 

                Message m = new Message();

                SessionSettings settings = new SessionSettings(new
FileInputStream("../test.cfg"));

                MessageStoreFactory messageStoreFactory = new
FileStoreFactory(settings);

                LogFactory logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);

                MessageFactory messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory();

 

 

                System.out.println("Successfully Loaded the JNI....");

                }

}

 

Regards,

 

Eranga

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

Don't use the ScreenLog.

--oren

On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Naveed Ali wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hello All FIXians,
>
> Though I have not received the reply on my previous message but I am
> confident of receiving the reply on this one...
>
> I want to hide/remove the messages that appear on the Console of
> Application when it is opened.
>
> I don't want to show the messages to my client what are outgoing /
> incoming message in the application.
>
> Is there any way to do this...?
>
> With regards
> -Naveed
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] [Quickfix-users] (no subject)

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

Hi Eranga,

Maybe, what you need to do is the installation of Visual C++ runtime DLLs.
If you installed Visual Studio 2005 SP1 recently, make sure you have
installed the correct package when you deploy your application, a
binary compiled with SP1 depends on a slightly different  VC runtime
version, its abasence generates this silly error - application
configuration is incorrect.

Djalma

On 6/22/07, Eranga Samararathna <pe...@ri...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to run the quickfix 1.12.4 on windows . I took a fresh machine and
> installed java 1.5 and msxml3 there. Then I ran a  my program there to test
> JNI. ( Pl look the code below ) . Then I am got the following error.
>
>
>
> C:\fix_test\test_JNI\bin>java -Djava.library.path=../lib JNITest
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
> C:\fix_test\test_JNI\
>
> lib\quickfix_jni.dll: This application has failed to start because the
> applicati
>
> on configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this
> problem
>
>
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
> Method)
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown
> Source)
>
>         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown
> Source)
>
>         at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
>
>         at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
>
>         at JNITest.<clinit>(JNITest.java:8)
>
>
>
> My Djava.library.path was correct. All other classpaths were ok. I think
> quickifix depends on some other .dll on windows plat form. I can't figure
> out what are they. Because when I install the Visual Studio 2005 IDE. It
> start working. I am wonder what is this hidden dependency.
>
>
>
> I build the quickfix using VS2005 .
>
>
>
> public class JNITest{
>
>
>
>                 static{
>
>                                 System.loadLibrary("quickfix_jni");
>
>                 }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{
>
>
>
>                 System.out.println("Start the JNI Compatibility Test
> Program....");
>
>
>
>                 Message m = new Message();
>
>                 SessionSettings settings = new SessionSettings(new
> FileInputStream("../test.cfg"));
>
>                 MessageStoreFactory messageStoreFactory = new
> FileStoreFactory(settings);
>
>                 LogFactory logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);
>
>                 MessageFactory messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory();
>
>
>
>
>
>                 System.out.println("Successfully Loaded the JNI....");
>
>                 }
>
> }
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Eranga
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-users mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users
>
>

[Quickfix-developers] Hide the Messages from Console

[Naveed A. <na...@nc...>]

Hello All FIXians,

Though I have not received the reply on my previous message but I am
confident of receiving the reply on this one...

I want to hide/remove the messages that appear on the Console of
Application when it is opened.

I don't want to show the messages to my client what are outgoing /
incoming message in the application.

Is there any way to do this...?

With regards
-Naveed

[Quickfix-developers] (no subject)

[Eranga S. <pe...@ri...>]

Hi,

 

I want to run the quickfix 1.12.4 on windows . I took a fresh machine and
installed java 1.5 and msxml3 there. Then I ran a  my program there to test
JNI. ( Pl look the code below ) . Then I am got the following error.

 

C:\fix_test\test_JNI\bin>java -Djava.library.path=../lib JNITest

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
C:\fix_test\test_JNI\

lib\quickfix_jni.dll: This application has failed to start because the
applicati

on configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this
problem

 

        at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)

        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)

        at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)

        at JNITest.<clinit>(JNITest.java:8)

 

My Djava.library.path was correct. All other classpaths were ok. I think
quickifix depends on some other .dll on windows plat form. I can't figure
out what are they. Because when I install the Visual Studio 2005 IDE. It
start working. I am wonder what is this hidden dependency.

 

I build the quickfix using VS2005 .

 

public class JNITest{

 

                static{

                                System.loadLibrary("quickfix_jni");

                }

 

 

 

public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{

 

                System.out.println("Start the JNI Compatibility Test
Program....");

 

                Message m = new Message();

                SessionSettings settings = new SessionSettings(new
FileInputStream("../test.cfg"));

                MessageStoreFactory messageStoreFactory = new
FileStoreFactory(settings);

                LogFactory logFactory = new FileLogFactory(settings);

                MessageFactory messageFactory = new DefaultMessageFactory();

 

 

                System.out.println("Successfully Loaded the JNI....");

                }

}

 

Regards,

 

Eranga

Re: [Quickfix-developers] order Cancel/Replace

[Caleb E. <cal...@gm...>]

On 6/21/07, hanikhalife <h.k...@id...> wrote:
> when i send an order then send message order cancel/replace i get error
> message
> "Found duplicate ClOrdID on a message with PossDupFlag not sent or set to N
> "

Looks like you re-used a ClOrdID from an earlier message on your
replace request.  Here it is in (IMHO) more readable form:

BeginString[8]=FIX.4.2  BodyLength[9]=161
MsgType[35]=OrderCancelReplaceRequest[G]  MsgSeqNo[34]=572
SenderCompID[49]=ids101  SendingTime[52]=2007-06-21T07:48:41.710-0400
TargetCompID[56]=OPENFIX  ClOrdID[11]=20070621-14473710763-1
HandlInst[21]=Manual[3]  OrderQty[38]=2600  OrdType[40]=MKT[1]
OrigClOrdID[41]=20070621-14473710763-1  Side[54]=Sell[2]
Symbol[55]=MOT  TransactTime[60]=2007-06-21T10:48:41-0400  10=247


> the execution report received not contains the OrigClOrdID
> what is the different between OrigClOrdID and ClOrdID?

OrigClOrdID is used when referring to an earlier order.  ClOrdID must
be unique on every request, even cancel and replace requests.  These
should have the OrigClOrdID set to the ClOrdID of the order you wish
to cancel/replace.

Plenty of reading at:

http://fixprotocol.org/

-- 
Caleb Epstein

Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX store and log DB down

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

Hi,

My opinion is that logging is not critical, its purpose is tracking and audit.
For me, it is not a really a problem If the engine is not able to log
for a short period of time, but the application can still process the
received message and sending is working. I just would like to  have
the information somewhere saying that I lost some logging during this
period of time because the database is out (that is why I would like
to have an alert mechanism provided by the storage classes).

> 2. What will the QF engine response if the other side send message to QF
> during the period store down?

-> The store is used for retransmission purposes, thus the received
messages are not persisted in the store, only the ones that are sent.

Thanks Oren, I will check the changes in repository.

Regards,
Djalma

On 6/21/07, bennyzlm <ben...@ho...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Thanks Djalma and Oren for help! I still have some concern:
> If the store is down (not able to connect or schema change, etc), quickfix
> will return false on send.
> 1. Will the message be sent to the other side? or no guarantee?
> 2. What will the QF engine response if the other side send message to QF
> during the period store down?
>
> >From my personal opinion, I don't want quickfix becomes responseless if the
> store/log is down. For the first point, the application behind the engine
> will know if something is wrong in quickfix and can decide what is the next
> step to do. Thus would simply do not send out the message be more feasible
> for the application to "rescue" (no matter stop the engine, give out warn,
> something like "plug and play" to another store/log destination)? For the
> second point, I will further check if the other things in QF works correctly
> if the store/log down.
>
> Regards,
> Benny
>
>
> Oren Miller wrote:
> >
> > QuickFIX Documentation:
> > http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> > QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> >
> > The repository changes this.  Now quickfix return false on send if
> > the store is unavailable.
> >
> > --oren
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Djalma Rosa dos Santos Filho wrote:
> >
> >> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/
> >> html/index.html
> >> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> >>
> >> Hi Benny,
> >>
> >> Following is my opinion:
> >>
> >> I don't believe that the logging unavailability should be a reason to
> >> reject a message, although this is a problem that I would like to be
> >> able to detect and correct it at my side asap.
> >>
> >> Anyway, some weeks ago when I was debugging a specific application
> >> error, I also found that the errors in underlying database are simply
> >> hidden from the application, like for example undesired schema
> >> modifications, connection failures etc.
> >>
> >> I thought about an alert mechanism for monitoring, some kind of
> >> callback function or an external file to log errors in logging class
> >> (MySQLLog e.g.). This way, it would become easier to detect errors and
> >> have a recovery mechanism in the application for logging and store.
> >>
> >> Following was the issue I opened with a feature request.
> >> http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker/bug.php?op=show&bugid=255
> >>
> >> I figure out that the problem is worse if the Store is down,
> >> SendToTarget will return false, although the message might have been
> >> sent.  But, with no warranty at all, since retransmission won't be
> >> possible in this situation.
> >>
> >> I belive that currently QF has a very optimistic aproach for the
> >> problems we're concerned about.
> >>
> >> Djalma
> >>
> >> On 6/20/07, bennyzlm <ben...@ho...> wrote:
> >>> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/
> >>> html/index.html
> >>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Currently I am focusing on recovery if some component in the
> >>> system down.
> >>> More specificly, if I use MySQL to be the store and log
> >>> destination for
> >>> quickfix, what will the quickfix engine response to the messaged
> >>> received
> >>> during MySQL is down? I did some experiments and it seems quickfix
> >>> throws
> >>> some SQL exception but do not response any reject message. Is
> >>> there any way
> >>> in quickfix to response the other side that it is down, or reject
> >>> to any
> >>> action taken by the other side? Thanks for any help!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Benny
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store-
> >>> and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11208236
> >>> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> >>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> >>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> >>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> >>> Qui...@li...
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> >>>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> >> Qui...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> >>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quickfix-developers mailing list
> > Qui...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store-and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11226570
> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

[Quickfix-developers] order Cancel/Replace

[hanikhalife <h.k...@id...>]

Hi=20
i am begginer in QF=20

I create an application in QF and i try to test it with openFIX=20

when i send an order then send message order cancel/replace i get error
message=20
"Found duplicate ClOrdID on a message with PossDupFlag not sent or set to N
"

the execution report received not contains the OrigClOrdID

what is the different between OrigClOrdID and ClOrdID?

Message sent :
8=3DFIX.4.2=019=3D161=0135=3DG=0134=3D572=0149=3Dids101=0152=3D20070621-11:=
48:41.710=0156=3DOPENFIX=0111=3D20070621-14473710763-1=0121=3D3=0138=3D2600=
=0140=3D1=0141=3D20070621-14473710763-1=0154=3D2=0155=3DMOT=0160=3D20070621=
-14:48:41=0110=3D247=01




--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/order-Cancel-Replace-tf=
3958320.html#a11231751
Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX store and log DB down

[bennyzlm <ben...@ho...>]

Thanks Djalma and Oren for help! I still have some concern:
If the store is down (not able to connect or schema change, etc), quickfix
will return false on send.
1. Will the message be sent to the other side? or no guarantee?
2. What will the QF engine response if the other side send message to QF
during the period store down?

>From my personal opinion, I don't want quickfix becomes responseless if the
store/log is down. For the first point, the application behind the engine
will know if something is wrong in quickfix and can decide what is the next
step to do. Thus would simply do not send out the message be more feasible
for the application to "rescue" (no matter stop the engine, give out warn,
something like "plug and play" to another store/log destination)? For the
second point, I will further check if the other things in QF works correctly
if the store/log down.

Regards,
Benny


Oren Miller wrote:
> 
> QuickFIX Documentation:
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
> 
> The repository changes this.  Now quickfix return false on send if  
> the store is unavailable.
> 
> --oren
> 
> On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Djalma Rosa dos Santos Filho wrote:
> 
>> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
>> html/index.html
>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>
>> Hi Benny,
>>
>> Following is my opinion:
>>
>> I don't believe that the logging unavailability should be a reason to
>> reject a message, although this is a problem that I would like to be
>> able to detect and correct it at my side asap.
>>
>> Anyway, some weeks ago when I was debugging a specific application
>> error, I also found that the errors in underlying database are simply
>> hidden from the application, like for example undesired schema
>> modifications, connection failures etc.
>>
>> I thought about an alert mechanism for monitoring, some kind of
>> callback function or an external file to log errors in logging class
>> (MySQLLog e.g.). This way, it would become easier to detect errors and
>> have a recovery mechanism in the application for logging and store.
>>
>> Following was the issue I opened with a feature request.
>> http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker/bug.php?op=show&bugid=255
>>
>> I figure out that the problem is worse if the Store is down,
>> SendToTarget will return false, although the message might have been
>> sent.  But, with no warranty at all, since retransmission won't be
>> possible in this situation.
>>
>> I belive that currently QF has a very optimistic aproach for the
>> problems we're concerned about.
>>
>> Djalma
>>
>> On 6/20/07, bennyzlm <ben...@ho...> wrote:
>>> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
>>> html/index.html
>>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Currently I am focusing on recovery if some component in the  
>>> system down.
>>> More specificly, if I use MySQL to be the store and log  
>>> destination for
>>> quickfix, what will the quickfix engine response to the messaged  
>>> received
>>> during MySQL is down? I did some experiments and it seems quickfix  
>>> throws
>>> some SQL exception but do not response any reject message. Is  
>>> there any way
>>> in quickfix to response the other side that it is down, or reject  
>>> to any
>>> action taken by the other side? Thanks for any help!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Benny
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store- 
>>> and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11208236
>>> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> ----
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Quickfix-developers mailing list
>>> Qui...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfix-developers mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>>
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store-and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11226570
Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX store and log DB down

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

The repository changes this.  Now quickfix return false on send if  
the store is unavailable.

--oren

On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Djalma Rosa dos Santos Filho wrote:

> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
> html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
> Hi Benny,
>
> Following is my opinion:
>
> I don't believe that the logging unavailability should be a reason to
> reject a message, although this is a problem that I would like to be
> able to detect and correct it at my side asap.
>
> Anyway, some weeks ago when I was debugging a specific application
> error, I also found that the errors in underlying database are simply
> hidden from the application, like for example undesired schema
> modifications, connection failures etc.
>
> I thought about an alert mechanism for monitoring, some kind of
> callback function or an external file to log errors in logging class
> (MySQLLog e.g.). This way, it would become easier to detect errors and
> have a recovery mechanism in the application for logging and store.
>
> Following was the issue I opened with a feature request.
> http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker/bug.php?op=show&bugid=255
>
> I figure out that the problem is worse if the Store is down,
> SendToTarget will return false, although the message might have been
> sent.  But, with no warranty at all, since retransmission won't be
> possible in this situation.
>
> I belive that currently QF has a very optimistic aproach for the
> problems we're concerned about.
>
> Djalma
>
> On 6/20/07, bennyzlm <ben...@ho...> wrote:
>> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/ 
>> html/index.html
>> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently I am focusing on recovery if some component in the  
>> system down.
>> More specificly, if I use MySQL to be the store and log  
>> destination for
>> quickfix, what will the quickfix engine response to the messaged  
>> received
>> during MySQL is down? I did some experiments and it seems quickfix  
>> throws
>> some SQL exception but do not response any reject message. Is  
>> there any way
>> in quickfix to response the other side that it is down, or reject  
>> to any
>> action taken by the other side? Thanks for any help!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benny
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store- 
>> and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11208236
>> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quickfix-developers mailing list
>> Qui...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX store and log DB down

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

Hi Benny,

Following is my opinion:

I don't believe that the logging unavailability should be a reason to
reject a message, although this is a problem that I would like to be
able to detect and correct it at my side asap.

Anyway, some weeks ago when I was debugging a specific application
error, I also found that the errors in underlying database are simply
hidden from the application, like for example undesired schema
modifications, connection failures etc.

I thought about an alert mechanism for monitoring, some kind of
callback function or an external file to log errors in logging class
(MySQLLog e.g.). This way, it would become easier to detect errors and
have a recovery mechanism in the application for logging and store.

Following was the issue I opened with a feature request.
http://www.quickfixengine.org/bugtracker/bug.php?op=show&bugid=255

I figure out that the problem is worse if the Store is down,
SendToTarget will return false, although the message might have been
sent.  But, with no warranty at all, since retransmission won't be
possible in this situation.

I belive that currently QF has a very optimistic aproach for the
problems we're concerned about.

Djalma

On 6/20/07, bennyzlm <ben...@ho...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently I am focusing on recovery if some component in the system down.
> More specificly, if I use MySQL to be the store and log destination for
> quickfix, what will the quickfix engine response to the messaged received
> during MySQL is down? I did some experiments and it seems quickfix throws
> some SQL exception but do not response any reject message. Is there any way
> in quickfix to response the other side that it is down, or reject to any
> action taken by the other side? Thanks for any help!
>
> Regards,
> Benny
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store-and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11208236
> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

Re: [Quickfix-developers] how to get the data in field 58 in logout message

[Djalma R. d. S. F. <drs...@gm...>]

You will get this information in the Application::fromAdmin method,
optionally you can crack it too and handle the FIX42::logout message,
for example.

Application::onLogout notification may occur without a logout message,
for example in the case of a sudden loss of connection when the
counterparty won't have a chance to send a 35=5.

On 6/20/07, quickfixuser <fw...@ro...> wrote:
> QuickFIX Documentation: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/index.html
> QuickFIX Support: http://www.quickfixengine.org/services.html
>
>
> Hi,
> If the sequence number is wrong or there is connection problem, quickfix
> will logout and I can see in the log that 35=5 type message with more
> information in freetext field (58).
> However, onLogout callback does not pass message so I cannot grab the
> information in field 58 as I did for execution report in onMessage callback
> (using crack method).
> Do I miss something in the API?
> Thanks
>
> quickfixuser
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-get-the-data-in-field-58-in-logout-message-tf3952538.html#a11213915
> Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers
>

[Quickfix-developers] how to get the data in field 58 in logout message

[quickfixuser <fw...@ro...>]

Hi,
If the sequence number is wrong or there is connection problem, quickfix
will logout and I can see in the log that 35=5 type message with more
information in freetext field (58).
However, onLogout callback does not pass message so I cannot grab the
information in field 58 as I did for execution report in onMessage callback
(using crack method).
Do I miss something in the API?
Thanks

quickfixuser
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-get-the-data-in-field-58-in-logout-message-tf3952538.html#a11213915
Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Quickfix-developers] QuickFIX store and log DB down

[bennyzlm <ben...@ho...>]

Hi,

Currently I am focusing on recovery if some component in the system down.
More specificly, if I use MySQL to be the store and log destination for
quickfix, what will the quickfix engine response to the messaged received
during MySQL is down? I did some experiments and it seems quickfix throws
some SQL exception but do not response any reject message. Is there any way
in quickfix to response the other side that it is down, or reject to any
action taken by the other side? Thanks for any help!

Regards,
Benny
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/QuickFIX-store-and-log-DB-down-tf3950636.html#a11208236
Sent from the QuickFIX - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Orders never sent vs session vs startTime

[John G. <joh...@wa...>]

Hi and thanks for the answer,

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Caleb Epstein wrote:
>Have your perhaps copied this sample code from the "tradeclient" sample 
>application?  It always discards messages instead of resending them:
>
>void Application::toApp( FIX::Message& message, const FIX::SessionID& 
>sessionID )
>throw( FIX::DoNotSend )
>{
>  try
>  {
>    FIX::PossDupFlag possDupFlag;
>    message.getHeader().getField( possDupFlag );
>    if ( possDupFlag ) throw FIX::DoNotSend();
>  }

That was the first error I made when fumbling with queueing up orders on a
session that is down, quite some while ago, so it *should* not be the
cause, but I will check the version of the binary they are running vs what
is in CVS of our apps to be sure I am not throwing the DoNotSend
exception.

Thx
JG

Re: [Quickfix-developers] Orders never sent vs session vs startTime

[Caleb E. <cal...@gm...>]

On 6/19/07, John GALLET <joh...@wa...> wrote:
>
> What happened yesterday was the following (in UTC times)
>
> - startTime in config file: 04:30
> - actual launch of process: 04:00 (yes I told them it's useless)
> - immediate "Created Session" trace from the app which is just an
> std::cout from onCreate().
> - but the counterparty was down. So QF goes and tries the 4
> SocketConnectHostN it has available in config file and of course fails on
> all of them and goes on cycling.
> - at 05:44 we start sending orders to QF
> - at 07:01 the counterparty comes up and logon succeeds
> - all the previously sent orders have never been heard of again



Have your perhaps copied this sample code from the "tradeclient" sample
application?  It always discards messages instead of resending them:

void Application::toApp( FIX::Message& message, const FIX::SessionID&
sessionID )
throw( FIX::DoNotSend )
{
  try
  {
    FIX::PossDupFlag possDupFlag;
    message.getHeader().getField( possDupFlag );
    if ( possDupFlag ) throw FIX::DoNotSend();
  }
  catch ( FIX::FieldNotFound& ) {}

  std::cout << std::endl
  << "OUT: " << message << std::endl;
}



-- 
Caleb Epstein

Re: [Quickfix-developers] FileLogPath/FileStorePath in Session section

[Oren M. <or...@qu...>]

This is a bug with the current release which has been fixed in the  
repository.

On Jun 19, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Joe Asta wrote:

> When I put the FileLogPath and FileStorePath entries into the  
> respective session sections, I get an error that the FileLogPath is  
> missing.  Seeing as this creates multiple files per session anyway,  
> why can't this be configured to go to different directories?

[Quickfix-developers] Log File is not created

[Naveed A. <na...@nc...>]

=20
Hello there,

I am getting a problem...=20
When I run my Fix Engine and some messages are sent from/to it..=20
They are not logged in Log File
I have specified the FileLogPath in settings file under a session
section as

FileLogPath=3Dc:\INITIATOR_LOG

Re: [Quickfix-developers] FileStorePath And FileLogPath with Date for Multiple Sessions

[Alexey Z. <ale...@gm...>]

Hello,

I do the following before the initiator/acceptor creation:

    time_t ltime = time(0);
    struct tm *newtime = gmtime(&ltime);

    #define DTSTRSIZE    17
    char    timestr[DTSTRSIZE];
    strftime(timestr, DTSTRSIZE, "\\%Y%m%d", newtime);

    typedef std::set<FIX::SessionID>    TSessionsSet;
    TSessionsSet            TheSet = m_settings->getSessions();
    TSessionsSet::iterator    it = TheSet.begin();
    if(it != TheSet.end())
    {
        FIX::SessionID        SessionID = *it;
        FIX::Dictionary        Dictionary = m_settings->get(SessionID);

        std::string path = Dictionary.getString(FIX::FILE_LOG_PATH);
        FIX::file_mkdir(path.c_str());

        path += timestr;
        Dictionary.setString(FIX::FILE_LOG_PATH, path);

        path = Dictionary.getString(FIX::FILE_STORE_PATH);
        FIX::file_mkdir(path.c_str());

        path += timestr;
        Dictionary.setString(FIX::FILE_STORE_PATH, path);

        m_settings->set(SessionID, Dictionary);
    }

Regards,
		Alexey Zubko


>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> [Quickfix-developers] FileStorePath And FileLogPath with Date for 
> Multiple Sessions
> From:
> "Joe Asta" <JA...@ru...>
> Date:
> Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:59:42 -0400
> To:
> <qui...@li...>
>
> To:
> <qui...@li...>
>
>
> Is there a way to configure QuickFix to include a date in the path 
> where the logs and store are created?
>  
> I would like to see a new directory created for each day that contains 
> the logs and store files for each of the sessions. 
>  
> It might look something like this:
>  
> 20070601
> ->Session1
> -->logs
> --->[files for logs]
> -->store
> --->[files for store]
> ->Session2
> -->logs
> --->[files for logs]
> -->store
> --->[files for store]
> 20070602
> ->Session1
> -->logs
> --->[files for logs]
> -->store
> --->[files for store]
> ->Session2
> -->logs
> --->[files for logs]
> -->store
> --->[files for store]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>