Re: [Quickfix-users] Msg Seq No
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: aupadras <ani...@ya...> - 2013-06-18 14:54:02
|
Hi Mike, Thanks for your response. It seems the issue was resolved. I changed some of the settings in the config file and the data dictionary that solved the socket error and other issues. As expected I am resetting the the MsgNo to 1 every night and increment the seq no every time a new message was sent back and forth. Currently, I am working on the execution report to receive the fill back after the order is completely executed. Please address the following questions and let me know if I am not on the right track. Questions : a) Currently, I am logging the create and message log using the filefactory settings. This current setting does not distinguish the incoming and outbound messages. I only see what I am sending on my side. How can I see or view the logs of my counter party messages (in my case the acceptor messages) ? Is something already existing in quick fix to log incoming/outbound messages or do we need to write the logic using toApp, fromApp and toadmin and fromadmin event handlers? b) What is the quickest way in quick-FIX to retrieve the execution report ? writing it to csv or to the data base (SQL Server). However, we would like to have the complete execution of split fills to the database by the end of the day. c) Also, currently I designed system for new Single Order as provided in the examples initiator start and initiator stop. We trade particular set of markets at particular time of the day, my question is whether the design will be robust if I send the multiple orders at 1 PM i.e.., for "n" orders sending the "n" separate new single Order type messages (with initiator start and stop) at 1 PM. How does this work in terms of session IDs, msg seq nos and conflicts in getting the filled split fills) d) Is there any efficient way using quick fix to send multiple orders in one shot rather than sending it multiple times as new single order messages ? If so, what are the pros and cons in implementing the (c) vs (d). Any input or information or suggestion is highly appreciated. Thanks, aupadras. -- View this message in context: http://quickfix.13857.n7.nabble.com/Msg-Seq-No-tp6492p6500.html Sent from the QuickFIX - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |