[Quickfix-developers] ThreadedSocketInitiator/ SynchronizedApplication vs SocketInitiator/ Synchron
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
From: Naveed A. <na...@nc...> - 2007-08-16 10:41:23
|
Hello All,=20 I am using an initiator (ThreadedSocketInitiator/Application) to connect to an Acceptor (ThreadedSocketAcceptor/Application).=20 This acceptor accepts connection from various initiators.=20 The initiator just connects to this acceptor.=20 What can be a better alternate if any in terms of the application architecture is concerned...?=20 For the Initiator=20 1. Should I use ThreadedSocketInitiator and SynchronizedApplication..?=20 2. Should I use SocketInitiator and SynchronizedApplication..?=20 3. Should I use SocketInitiator and Application..?=20 4. Should I use ThreadedSocketInitiator and Application..?=20 For the Acceptor=20 1. Should I use ThreadedSocketAcceptor and SynchronizedApplication..?=20 2. Should I use SocketAcceptor and SynchronizedApplication..?=20 3. Should I use SocketAcceptor and Application..?=20 4. Should I use ThreadedSocketAcceptor and Application..?=20 Thanks in Advance -Naveed=20 =20 |