Re: [Quickfix-developers] ThreadedSocketInitiator vs SocketInitiator

[Caleb E. <cal...@gm...>]

On 5/30/06, Ajay Kamdar <Aja...@tr...> wrote:

> Otherwise messages
> that the application thought it had sent might still be waiting to be
> processed by a worker thread in an in-memory queue and might be lost in
> case of an engine failover.

Clearly this would not be an acceptable implementation.

-- 
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com