Re: Last Quesa is very slow

[Sauro A. <sag...@in...>]

>
>  >
>>  Practically the latest version is faster using OpenGl and Quesa Logo,
>>  but it is very slow with the MultiBox  model, independently of the
>>  kind of renderer, where last Quesa for Intel is slower than Quesa 1.8
>>  emulated with Rosetta!
>>
>>  Also with our programs we have similar results, with the latest
>>  version that is 3 times slower than Quesa 1.8 and previous versions
>>  (12  FPS versus 36 FPS).
>>
>>  Any suggestions?
>
>Are you sure you're comparing builds made with the same compiler and
>optimization options?  I am a little skeptical, because outside the
>OpenGL renderer, I think most recent changes have been intended to
>improve performance.

I compiled the release version just with the options of the downloaded project.
Looking to the Quesa Logo FPS there is a big improvement, from 1500 
to 2500, while multibox goes down from 36 to 12, so it doesn't seem 
depend on some optimization option, the difference is too big.


>
>Besides my previous suggestion to try Shark, you could use cvs to try to
>narrow down the problem.  That is, check out the sources as of various
>dates between 1.8 and now, to try to discover when a slowdown happened.
>--


I'll try to test with Shark.

Sauro