|
From: Sauro A. <int...@in...> - 2007-09-28 16:58:06
|
Using the latest Quesa we found that it is very slow than the old 1.8
version and previous versions, especially with polygons and general
polygons.
The problems is evident with our programs, where using the latest
version of Quesa, navigating is very slow using any renderer.
We tested different versions of Quesa on different computers using
Geom Test with the following results:
Test MultiBox
Quesa Logo MultiBox Quesa Logo
Interactive
Interactive OpenGl OpenGl
FPS
FPS FPS FPS
Last Quesa on iMac Intel Core duo 1.83 GHz 12
1030 11 2500
Last Quesa on G5 Dual 1.8 GHz 9
630 11 1500
Quesa 1.8 on iMac Intel Core duo 1.83 GHz 36
970 ----- -----
Quesa 1.8 on G5 Dual 1.8 GHz 26
720 ----- -----
Old Geom Test 2003 on iMac and Rosetta 18
500 ----- -----
Old Geom Test 2003 on G5 Dual 1.8 GHz 28
730 ----- -----
Practically the latest version is faster using OpenGl and Quesa Logo,
but it is very slow with the MultiBox model, independently of the
kind of renderer, where last Quesa for Intel is slower than Quesa 1.8
emulated with Rosetta!
Also with our programs we have similar results, with the latest
version that is 3 times slower than Quesa 1.8 and previous versions
(12 FPS versus 36 FPS).
Any suggestions?
Sauro Agostini
|