|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-07-25 02:20:14
|
Feature Requests item #900675, was opened at 2004-02-19 13:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=442055&aid=900675&group_id=45158 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Dair Grant (grantd) Assigned to: James W. Walker (jwwalker) Summary: Add FSRef based storage object Initial Comment: We should add Mac OS TQ3StorageObjects based on FSRefs rather than FSSpecs, to support both types of file specifiers. The API should mirror the Q3FSSpecStorage_xxx calls, and Q3MacintoshStorage_GetType should be extended to return a kQ3MacintoshStorageTypeFSRef constant. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-07-24 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James W. Walker (jwwalker) Date: 2007-07-10 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=433183 Originator: NO I have implemented the FSRef storage APIs, however FSRef storage objects are actually the same class of object as FSSpec storage objects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=442055&aid=900675&group_id=45158 |