Re: Time for Classic Mac to go?

[Sean M. <se...@ro...>]

On 7/8/07 2:44 PM, James W. Walker said:

>Now that I'm thinking about removing deprecated and otherwise dusty  
>code, do we still need to support Classic=3F  I'm not talking about  
>assuming OS X yet, we could still run under OS 9 with Carbon.

I encourage this. :)  Frankly, I'd drop anything before 10.3.9.  I think
if Quesa is to have any hope of working in 64 bit, some old stuff will
need to go.

-- 
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 se...@ro...
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com 
Mac Software Developer              Montr=E9al, Qu=E9bec, Canada