|
From: James W. <ja...@fr...> - 2007-02-15 21:44:43
|
Roger Holmes wrote: > I see. Would a Q3Shared_DecrementEditIndex be very slightly less > dangerous? Perhaps... but I can imagine having a situation where you're going to be doing several operations that you don't want to affect caches, and it would be easier to get the edit index, do the operations, and set the edit index, rather then figure out exactly how much you need to decrement the edit index. By the way, Q3Shared_Edited isn't actually documented to increment the edit index, though that's what it does. The docs just say "change the edit index". -- James W. Walker, Innoventive Software LLC <http://www.frameforge3d.com/> |