|
From: <lo...@ma...> - 2006-02-21 02:04:54
|
On 21 f=E9vr. 06, at 02:42, James W. Walker wrote: > > There are two ways to approach this, the easy way and the hard =20 > way. The easy way would be to find a way to make the compiler stop =20= > complaining. Actually, I am surprised that it is an error rather =20 > than a warning. What happens if you use reinterpret_cast instead =20 > of a C-style cast? I've tried with reinterpret_cast method but it's the same thing here. =20= doing an error with GCC 4.0.1 I'll keep you inform if I find a solution thanks, -- lo=EFc |