Re: At last! I have finished the Quesa changes.

[Roger H. <rog...@mi...>]

On Friday, February 11, 2005, at 07:51 AM, James W.Walker wrote:

>
> I don't think we should keep using "d" version numbers.  That may have 
> a stigma of "not ready for prime time" in some people's minds.  Just 
> because Quesa is in continuous development doesn't mean it shouldn't 
> be used in production.

So 1.7b1 maybe?

>
> I also don't see the point of a final 1.6.  Anyone who would use that 
> instead of 1.7 (or whatever we call it) should have his or her head 
> examined, in my humble opinion.


Thanks.

Roger.