Re: inlining (was Re: First stage of Quesa changes now complete)

[James W. W. <os...@jw...>]

On Jan 27, 2005, at 8:11 AM, Joseph J. Strout wrote:

> At 10:07 PM +0100 1/26/05, Jose' Cruanyes wrote:
>
>>> a single line function (OpaqueTQ3Object::IsObjectValid) into
>>> an inline in the class definition. Is it OK to check this in or is
>>> there a policy against in-lines?
>>
>> nothing against if not exposed in the Quesa headers
>
> But how can you make an inline function without exposing it in the=20
> headers?

I'd guess that Jos=E9 probably meant that inline functions should not be=20=

in the *public* headers.
--
<http://www.jwwalker.com/>