Re: First stage of Quesa changes now complete

[James W. W. <os...@jw...>]

On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Roger Holmes wrote:

> Sorry to be so stupid, but do you mean use the default operator new or 
> provide
> one myself or provide one with an extra parameter or use 
> new(std::nothrow) ?
>
>> I agree.  If you provide a constructor, I think it's OK to use plain 
>> old operator new.

Unless you have a strategy for dealing with exceptions, and catching 
them before they try to escape from the library, then use 
new(std::nothrow), which is one of the standard versions of operator 
new.  I did already in e3fformat_3dmf_textreader_new.
--
<http://www.jwwalker.com/>