Re: C++ changes

[Jose' C. <cru...@ce...>]

Il giorno 06/gen/05, alle 17:15, Roger Holmes ha scritto:

> I have changed the plan slightly as I am using '~' rather than '-'
> to modify the sizeof the new records as some classes have no
> instance data and 0 == -0 whereas 0 != ~0.
>

But why you just doesn't declares a new routine that takes the class 
size instead of the instance size, and add a flag to note what kind of 
class is it?


> 1) Should every E3ClassTree routine be a friend or a method?
> 2) If a method, then should ones with a TQ3Object take it as their 
> 'this' ?

I second the James proposal of a class for tree methods


> 3) If so, should the method names be as in option A, B or C ?

IMHO Always whatever makes sense (in your case option C)


Pax et Bonum

# dott. Jose' Cruanyes Aguilar  -  C.E. Soft srl
#  Pzza. Firenze,4 MILANO  -  XX Settembre 10, CREMONA
#   02,33603122                0372,460602