Re: Question on GeomTest.

[Peter M. <Pet...@mi...>]

Thanks for the answer.

The rasterized objects are coming along but now and then points are a 
little under or a little over the float value I was expecting onscreen 
in pixels. Should I assume that the float value I give to Quesa in 
Rasterize Transforms to be equal to the pixel value on screen ?

If they should I re-check my maths. Otherwise can I compensate in any 
way?
(At the moment I am adding extra 1.0f to short lines, not ideal but is 
working.)

Thanks in Advance,
Peter.



On 21 Sep 2004, at 16:50, James W. Walker wrote:

>
> On Sep 21, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Peter Michelsen wrote:
>
>> We have started to implement some of the new camera rastise transform 
>> style objects.
>> I was reading the code in GeomTest for "createTestRasterize" and 
>> would like to know why you create UV's for the object even thou you 
>> are likely never to add a texture. In other words should I be 
>> creating UVs to camera rastise objects that I know will never have 
>> textures on them? Or have I miss the point of why the SurfaceUV 
>> attribute has been added.
>
> It's probably just because of the "Toggle Texture" command in Geom 
> Test.  For your own use, I do not think you need UVs on an object that 
> will not be textured.
> --
> <http://www.jwwalker.com/>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Quesa-develop mailing list
> Que...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quesa-develop
>