Re: Memory storage growth

[Roger H. <rog...@mi...>]

Sounds good to me.


On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 07:13  pm, James W. Walker wrote:

> While trying to write a large object to a memory storage object, I 
> noticed that more than half the time was spent in 
> e3storage_memory_grow.  Memory storage objects grow linearly, but it 
> is well known that you get better performance if you grow buffers 
> exponentially (e.g., double the size each time you need to grow.) 
> Shall I make exponential growth an option, or just change the standard 
> behavior?  I can't think of any reason that existing software would be 
> hurt by the change.