|
From: James W. W. <ja...@wr...> - 2004-06-01 22:31:33
|
Jose' Cruanyes <cru...@ce...> wrote: >yes, but really how it is implemented is not an issue, I see better >the other way around the custom elements can be implemented in terms >of Q3Object_GetValue/SetValue ( I prefer >Q3Object_GetProperty/SetProperty too) I don't see that we can do it the other way around. Custom elements in general can have special behavior on copying, deleting, etc. For instance a custom element may contain a reference to a Quesa object, and must do the right thing with reference counts. Q3Object_GetProperty/SetProperty is better suited to "plain old data". -- James W. Walker, ScriptPerfection Enterprises, Inc. <http://www.write-brain.com/> |