Re: Q3TriMesh_GetData

[Roger H. <rog...@mi...>]

On 18 Sep, 2008, at 17:42, James W. Walker wrote:

>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:13 AM, Roger Holmes wrote:
>
>> I suggest we return kQ3Failure and also set the faulty indexes to
>> zero. I know that will give strange looking data, but I think that is
>> better than crashing. Anyway, an application should see the  
>> kQ3Failure
>> and deal with it some other way, it is only apps which plough on
>> regardless which will actually display the faulty data.
>>
>> In a way it is a shame there is not a third alternative to kQ3Failure
>> and kQ3Success, something like a warning which we could return in the
>> case of an edge which we have made safe.
>
> The validation function could post a warning (via the error manager)  
> in the case of face indices of edges, and post an error in the case  
> of point indices of edges and faces.
>
Good idea.

Roger.