Re: Q3TriMesh_GetData

[James W. W. <os...@jw...>]

On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:13 AM, Roger Holmes wrote:

> I suggest we return kQ3Failure and also set the faulty indexes to
> zero. I know that will give strange looking data, but I think that is
> better than crashing. Anyway, an application should see the kQ3Failure
> and deal with it some other way, it is only apps which plough on
> regardless which will actually display the faulty data.
>
> In a way it is a shame there is not a third alternative to kQ3Failure
> and kQ3Success, something like a warning which we could return in the
> case of an edge which we have made safe.

The validation function could post a warning (via the error manager)  
in the case of face indices of edges, and post an error in the case of  
point indices of edges and faces.