From: Stefan J. <st...@gr...> - 2006-09-18 06:13:28
|
Am So, 17.09.2006, 20:59, schrieb roucaries bastien: > Hi, Hello Bastien, > Folowing a private discution with Michael.Margraf, I proposed the > creation of something like qucs-lib that is a set of shared library > used by qucs. > > The goal is to decrease code duplication This is a goal I do understand. > and in the second time allow > to create qucs wizard in python or octave for instance. I don't get yet the point. Please explain what you would like to achieve in detail. > Personnally I have a lot of octave script about filter conception, and > i will like to call them from qucs. A lot of script use an original > method develloped in my uni called "equivalent schematic", that are in > fact a graphical but nethertheless exact method to solve modal > equation in guided structure. That is for filter synthesis right? And you coded it in Octave? Now you want it have run from within the Qucs filter synthesis program. Did I understand that correctly? BTW: Vincent already made some more efforts regarding filter code. He added odd Cauer, zig-zag, and chebychev 2 (inverse) filters to his code and we are right now figuring out how to use his code... Right, Vincent? So what will your code be about? > I join a first attempt to create a base lib. Do you think it is worth > the effort. > > If yes, that do you think about gsl (gnu scientific library). > Personnally I believe that we could use a lot of gsl functions > (particularly some integral functions) in qucs because: > o this lib is well tested (used daily in cern) > o I do not like to badly reinvent some numerical method. The only thing I saw in this proposed lib was some numerial functions, so actually there seems no reason to use these if you intend to use GSL anyway? I do not yet see the purpose of this library yet. Please explain. Cheers, Stefan. |